DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Re-evaluation of a microbiological acceptable daily intake for tylosin based on its impact on human intestinal microflora

  • Min Ji Kim (Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Ji Young Kim (Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Jang Duck Choi (Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Guiim Moon (Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
  • Received : 2022.11.27
  • Accepted : 2023.03.29
  • Published : 2024.01.15

Abstract

As veterinary drugs available for fish is very restricted, there is growing trials for repurposing livestock drugs as aquatic animal drugs. Tylosin is one of the most effective antibiotics to treat bacterial infections approved for livestock, and would be used in fish. Hence, we investigated the toxicological and microbiological aspects of tylosin to establish health-based guidance value (HBGV) and maximum residue limit (MRL) in fishes, and reevaluated the microbiological acceptable daily intake (mADI) based on updated relevant data and international guildeline. Lastly, exposure assessment was performed to confirm the appropriateness of MRL. By investigating available microbiologcial studies on tylosin, the microbiological point of departure was determined as 0.308 ㎍/mL, which was mean 50% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50), obtained from the Food Safety Committee of Japan (FSCJ) evaluation report. Furthermore, as a factor for the derivation of mADI, the volume of colon content was recently changed to 500 mL in compliance with the International Cooperation on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products (VICH) guidelines. This was previously defined as the mass of colon content (220 g). We applied correction factor 0.224 to the mean MIC50 for tylosin in the equation of mADI, since the drug is transformed to metabolites with reduced activity prior to entering the colon and bound to fecal materials within the colon of human. The mADI was evaluated as 0.01 mg/kg bw/day. Finally, the hazard index, calculated by dividing the estimated chronic dietary exposure by mADI, did not exceed 100%, suggesting that chronic dietary exposure to tylosin residues from veterinary use was unlikely to be a public health concern. Overall, this study contributes significantly in updating HBGV by application of the concept of mADI for the frst time in Korea based on the revised microbiological risk assessment guidelines and in providing scientifc rationale for the risk management of veterinary drug residues in food.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea for 2021 (No. 21161MFDS361). Special thanks are ofered to members of the expert committees for their commitment.

References

  1. Joo MS, Hwang SD, Choi KM et al (2020) Application of tylosin antibiotics to olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) infected with Streptococcus parauberis. Fish Aquatic Sci 23:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-020-00165-8
  2. Weinroth MD, Martin JN, Doster E, Geornaras I, Parker JK, Carlson CR et al (2019) Investigation of tylosin in feed of feedlot cattle and efects on liver abscess prevalence, and fecal and soil microbiomes and resistomes. J Anim Sci 97:4567-4578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz306
  3. International Programme on Chemical Safety & Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Meeting (70th : 2008 : Geneva, Switzerland) (2009) Toxicological evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food /prepared by the seventieth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44086/9789241660617_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  4. Brisson-Noel A, Trieu-Cuot P, Courvalin P (1988) Mechanism of action of spiramycin and other macrolides. J Antimicrob Chemother 22 Suppl B:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/22.Supplement_B.13
  5. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Veterinary Medicines Evaluation Unit (1997) Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products: Tylosin. Summary Report (3). EMEA/MRL/205/97-FINAL. European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/mrl-report/tylosin-summary-report-3-committee-veterinary-medicinal-products_en.pdf
  6. OECD and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022-2031. OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/f1b0b29c-en. Accessed 29 June 2022
  7. Lee JH, Kim GW, Kwon MG, Seo JS (2021) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile, bioavailability, and withdrawal time of tylosin tartrate following a single intramuscular administration in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Animals (Basel) 11:2468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082468
  8. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (2019) VICH GL36: R2: Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: general approach to establish a microbiological ADI. European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/scientific-guideline/vich-gl36r2-studies-evaluate-safety-residues-veterinary-drugs-human-food-general-approach-establish_en.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2019
  9. Food Safety Commision of Japan (2019) Tylosin, 3rd edn. Veterinary Drugs and Feed Additives Assessment. Food Safety Commision of Japan [in Japanese]. http://www.fsc.go.jp/fsciis/attachedFile/download?retrievalId=Kya20190220029&fleId=201. Accessed 27 Feb 2019
  10. World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2008) Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Environmental Health Criteria 240, Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chemicals in Food, Chap 6. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241572408. Accessed 31 Dec 2008
  11. European Food Safety Authority (2011) Use of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database in Exposure Assessment. EFSA J 9:2097 (34 pp). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2097. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2097#abstract
  12. Baggot JD (1978) Some aspects of clinical pharmacokinetics in veterinary medicine: principles of pharmacokinetics I. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1:5-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1978.tb00300.x
  13. Prats C, El Korchi G, Francech R, Arboix M, Perez B (2002) Disposition kinetics of tylosin administered intravenously and intramuscularly to pigs. Res Vet Sci 73:141-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00036-X
  14. Ziv G, Sulman FG (1973) Serum and milk concentrations of spectinomycin and tylosin in cows and ewes. Am J Vet Res 34:329-333
  15. Ronaghinia AA, Birch JM, Frandsen HL, Toutain P-L, Damborg P, Struve T (2021) Evaluating a tylosin dosage regimen for treatment of Staphylococcus delphini infection in mink (Neovison vison): a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach. Vet Res 52:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-021-00906-0
  16. Patangia DV, Ryan CA, Dempsey E, Ross RP, Stanton C (2022) Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen. 11:e1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1260
  17. Wuethrich I, Pelzer BW, Khodamoradi Y, Vehreschild MJGT (2021) The role of the human gut microbiota in colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Gut Microbes 13:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1911279
  18. Ang QY, Alba DL, Upadhyay V, Bisanz JE, Cai J, Lee HL et al (2021) The East Asian gut microbiome is distinct from colocalized White subjects and connected to metabolic health. Elife 10:e70349. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.70349
  19. Mason MR, Nagaraja HN, Camerlengo T, Joshi V, Kumar PS (2014) Correction: deep sequencing identifes ethnicity-specific bacterial signatures in the oral microbiome. PLoS One 9:e99933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099933
  20. Lee WC, Lee MJ, Kim JS, Park SY (2001) Foodborne illness outbreaks in Korea and Japan studied retrospectively. J Food Prot 64:899-902. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-64.6.899
  21. Park JM, Lee WH, Seo H, Oh JY, Lee DY, Kim SJ, Hahm KB (2021) Fecal microbiota changes with fermented kimchi intake regulated either formation or advancement of colon adenoma. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 68:139-148. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.20-121
  22. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (2014) Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food: seventy-eighth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/127845/9789241209885_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  23. Pritchard SE, Marciani L, Garsed KC, Hoad CL, Thongborisute W, Roberts E et al (2014) Fasting and postprandial volumes of the undisturbed colon: normal values and changes in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome measured using serial MRI. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:124-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12243
  24. World Health Organization, Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2018) Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food: eighty-fifth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259895
  25. Utembe W, Kamngona AW (2021) Gut microbiota-mediated pesticide toxicity in humans: Methodological issues and challenges in the risk assessment of pesticides. Chemosphere 271:129817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129817