Journal of Practical Engineering Education (실천공학교육논문지)

Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education (한국실천공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Undergraduate Students' Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction Factors with the Learning Media: Focusing on Tablet PCs and Digital Pens

대학생들의 학습 매체에 대한 만족 및 불만족 요인에 관한 연구: 태블릿PC와 디지털 펜을 중심으로

  • Junyeong Lee (Department of Management Information Systems, Chungbuk National University)
  • 이준영 (충북대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.05.13
  • Accepted : 2023.07.19
  • Published : 2023.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Technological advancements in the field of information and communication have led to the advent and usage of various types of smart devices, which have significantly altered people's usage behaviors and environments. This change has also been applied to the learning environment, where various smart devices are appearing and the learning behavior of learners is changing accordingly. In this study, we investigate learners' perceptions of digital note-taking behaviors focusing on the recently emerged learning media, tablet PCs and digital pens. Drawing upon the expectancy-confirmation model, we conduct a study on the factors affecting the (dis)confirmation and (dis)satisfaction of undergraduate students with tablet PCs and digital pens by comparing their expectations with their actual use experiences. An open-ended survey was conducted among students at C University in Korea, and the responses were analyzed through qualitative content analysis to derive four factors of expectation-confirmation and satisfaction and three factors of expectation-disconfirmation and dissatisfaction. Based on these findings, we provide academic and educational implications.

정보통신 분야의 기술적 진보를 통해 다양한 종류의 스마트 기기들이 등장하고 활용되면서 사람들의 사용 행태와 환경에도 많은 변화가 발생했다. 이러한 변화는 학습 환경에서도 적용되어, 다양한 스마트 기기들이 학습 환경에 등장하고 있으며 학습자의 학습 행동 양식 또한 달라지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 학습 매체 및 필기 도구로 활용되는 스마트 기기 중 최근 등장한 디지털 펜과 태블릿PC를 중심으로, 이를 활용한 디지털 필기 행동에 대한 학습자의 인식을 알아보고자 한다. 기대 일치 모형을 활용하여, 대학생들의 태블릿PC와 디지털 펜에 대한 사전 기대 및 이후 사용 경험과의 비교를 통해 기대 (불)일치 및 (불)만족 요인에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 이를 위해 국내 C 대학교의 학생들을 대상으로 개방형 설문을 진행하고, 해당 응답을 질적 내용 분석을 통해 분석하여 네 가지 기대 일치 및 만족 요인과 세 가지 기대 불일치 및 불만족 요인을 도출하였다. 이후 결과를 바탕으로 학술적 및 교육적 시사점을 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Dearman and J. S. Pierce, "It's on my other computer! computing with multiple devices," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, pp. 767-776, 2008.
  2. J. J. Pilotta, D. E. Schultz, G. Drenik, and P. Rist, "Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning," Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 285-292, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.141
  3. Y. J. Lee, "A study on continuity of user experience in multi-device environment," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 495-500, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.495
  4. J. S. Hwang, "Connected-device Use in the Multi-device Environment. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131-171, 2012.
  5. M. J. Kim, Y. Lee, S. Baek, and B. H. Chang, "Factors affecting the usage intention of electronic books via mobile media: Focusing on the differences among devices," Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 5-43, 2014.
  6. S. Sweeney and F. Crestani, "Effective search results summary size and device screen size: Is there a relationship?," Information Processing & Management, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1056-1074, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.06.007
  7. H. Baek, Y. Huang, J. Kang, and J. Kim, "Analysis of competition and displacement factors in multi-device environments : focusing on the smartphone, TabletPC and TotebookPC," Korean Journal of Business Administration, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1383-1404, 2014.
  8. M. J. Choi, "A study on the effect of motivations for using smart media on using application," Korean Journal of Communication and Information, vol. 61, pp. 52-73, 2013.
  9. J. M. Lee, E. B. Jo, H. Y. Li, and J. Y. Rha, "A study on university students' use and assesment with digital devices and services for realizing smart campus," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 27-39, 2017.
  10. S. W. Han and B. Kim, "A study on the response of learners to university online education after Corona 19," Culture and Convergence, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 155-172, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2020.10.42.10.155
  11. C. Seong, "Digital devices instead of notes... The culture of note-taking in university classrooms has changed," in Civic News, 2022.
  12. S. Jun, J. Wee, and I. Park, "Learning effect of note-taking methods in different media," Journal of Integrated Design Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 9-26, 2020.
  13. P. A. Mueller and D. M. Oppenheimer, "The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking," Psychological Science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1159-1168, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
  14. M. Ando and M. Ueno, "Analysis of the Advantages of Using Tablet PC in e-Learning," in 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE, 2010.
  15. H. Byun and Y. Song, "Reversal adoption elements of paper medium in screen medium learning process," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 73-94, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.1.073
  16. A. Bhattacherjee, "Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model," MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 351-370, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  17. J. B. Sim, "A study on differentiation strategy for Tablet PC and e-Book reader by a comparative analysis of acceptance. diffusion factors," Korean Management Science Review, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 25-42, 2011.
  18. R. C. Atkinson and R. M. Shiffrin, "The control of short-term memory," Scientific American, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 82-91, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0871-82
  19. H. Hembrooke and G. Gay, "The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments," Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 15, pp. 46-64, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940852
  20. L. Lin and C. Bigenho, "Note-taking and memory in different media environments," Computers in the Schools, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 200-216, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.594989
  21. F. Di Vesta and G. Gray, "Listening and note taking," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 8-14, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032243
  22. M. C. Wittrock, "Learning as a generative process," Educational Psychologist, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 87-95, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129
  23. R. L. Oliver, "A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 460-469, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  24. X. L. Shen, Y. J. Li, and Y. Sun, "Wearable health information systems intermittent discontinuance: A revised expectation-disconfirmation model," Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 506-523, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0222
  25. S. R. Lee and Y. O. Jung, "A study on continued use of online shopping site using a weighted expectation-confirmation model," Korean Management Science Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 135-155, 2008.
  26. A. Bhattacherjee and C. P. Lin, "A unified model of IT continuance: three complementary perspectives and crossover effects," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 364-373, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.36
  27. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models," Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 903-1028, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.903
  28. J. Lee, C. Jeong, and N. Kim, "Effect of characteristics of YouTube tourism contents on confirmation, perceived usefulness, satisfaction and loyalty : Application of the Expectation-Confirmation Model(ECM)," International Journal of Tourism Management and Science, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 47-70, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21719/IJTMS.34.8.3
  29. H. H. Jeong, "A study of factors affecting continuous behavior intention of college students on MOOC-based on TAM, ECM, and TFM," Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 315-343, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.23.2.315
  30. K. Park, M. Oh, J. H. Ahn, and D. Kim, "Expected values on the continuous intention to use IoT products from the perspective of expectation-confirmation theory," Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 19-38, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2019.44.4.019
  31. J. H. Han, S. H. Jae, B. H. Kim, and J. S. Park, "Effects of consumer trust and perceived usefulness on mobile payments and online shopping website loyalty," Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 75-87, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.75
  32. S. Son, "The effects of perceived usefulness of computerized accounting program in university education and user's characteristics on system satisfaction and integrated loyalty," Korean International Accounting Review, vol. 47, pp. 17-40, 2013. https://doi.org/10.21073/kiar.2013..47.002
  33. N. L. Sproull, "Handbook of research methods: A guide for practitioners and students in the social sciences," Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2002.
  34. U. Flick, "An introduction to qualitative research," Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
  35. C. Kwak, J. Lee, and H. Lee, "Could you ever forget me? Why people want to be forgotten online," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 179, pp. 25-42, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04747-x
  36. P. I. Erickson, and C. P. Kaplan, "Maximizing qualitative responses about smoking in structured interviews," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 829-840, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118859
  37. A. Ardichvili, V. Page, and T. Wentling, "Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice," Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 64-77, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626
  38. J. Y. Cho and E. H. Lee, "Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences," The Qualitative Report, vol. 19, no. 32, pp. 1-20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028
  39. S. B. Merriam, "Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis," San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass, 2002.
  40. S. Elo and H. Kyngas, "The qualitative content analysis process," Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107-115, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  41. P. Burnard, "A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research," Nurse Education Today, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 461-466, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-Y
  42. H. F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277-1288, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  43. E. C. Valderrama Bahamondez, T. Kubitza, N. Henze, and A. Schmidt, "Analysis of children's handwriting on touchscreen phones," in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Munich, Germany: ACM, 2013.