DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 소비재 기업의 지속 가능한 플라스틱 경영 전략 평가를 위한 지표 개발

Evaluation of Sustainable Plastic Management Strategy of Korean Consumer Goods Companies

  • 한수호 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 권성구 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 박준희 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스 연구원) ;
  • 이정기 (고려대학교 경영대학) ;
  • 이재혁 (고려대학교 경영대학) ;
  • 성용준 (고려대학교 심리학부) ;
  • 황성연 (경희대학교 식물환경신소재공학과) ;
  • 옥용식 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Suho Han (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Seongku Kwon (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Junhee Park (OJEong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Jeongki Lee (Korea University Business School) ;
  • Jay Hyuk Rhee (Korea University Business School) ;
  • Yongjun Sung (School of Psychology, Korea University) ;
  • Sung Yeon Hwang (Department of Plant and Environmental New Resources, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yong Sik Ok (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.06
  • 심사 : 2023.11.02
  • 발행 : 2023.11.30

초록

Growing stringent global regulations in Korea poses a threat to corporate sustainability. Companies must respond strategically to navigate these regulations and avoid greenwashing. Objective of this research was to analyze how Korean companies are responding to the global trend of reducing plastic use and propose improved management strategies. Seven indicators were developed to assess companies' post-plastic strategies and applied to analyze the sustainability reports of Amore Pacific and LG Household & HealthCare. These indicators included, 1) disclosure of plastic raw materials used by weight or volume, 2) disclosure of recycled plastic raw materials used by weight or volume, 3) disclosure of waste recycling, reuse amounts, and disposal using waste treatment method 4) strategies to reduce environmental impact of plastics, 5) plastic packaging, reduce, recycle, reuse, and composting (in the real environment), 6) plastic management roadmap for the circular economy, and 7) education for sustainable plastic management. Based on the review of considered companies, we propose in-listed sustainable plastics management strategies: disclosing the ratio of plastic raw materials and recycled raw materials for all products, considering recycling rate throughout the product value chain, and not only for the production phase, reviewing carbon dioxide emissions based on life cycle assessment rather than reducing plastic consumption, studying the biodegradability of biodegradable plastics in natural environment such as soil, considering the consumer's perspective.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 전 세계적으로 증가하는 국내외(유럽연합, UN)의 탈 플라스틱 정책, 규제, 협약이 강화됨에 따라 국내 기업이 나가야 할 방향에 대해 논의하였다. 본 연구의 기업 선정이나 세부 평가 내용은 기업의 지원 없이 국제ESG협회가 주관하여 전국 대학생을 대상으로 실시한 ESG 아카데미 제1기 교육 과정을 통해 학생들이 자발적으로 결정하고 중립적으로 수행한 결과물이다. 또한 이 논문은 2023년도 고려대학교의 교내 학술 연구 활동 "지속가능한 플라스틱의 생산과 소비를 위한 ESG 경영: 환경(E) 부문 전략 수립"의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구이다(과제번호: K2300161).

참고문헌

  1. AmorePacific, 2021, Sutainability Report, Seoul, Korea.
  2. CE100, 2023, https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/plastics-vision.
  3. CEFLEX, 2023 ,https://ceflex.eu/.
  4. Chandra, S., Verma, S., 2023, Big data and sustainable consumption: A Review and research agenda. Vision, 27(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211022520
  5. De Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. D. L., 2015, Sustainability or profitability? How communicated motives for environmental policy affect public perceptions of corporate greenwashing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1327
  6. Frame, J., Aylwin, J., Estripeau, R., Cleary, O., 2022, Winning the Consumer with Sustainability-Short-Term Imperative, Long-Term Opportunity-. Boston Consulting Group.
  7. GRI, 2016, GRI 301: Materials 2016, Efflunents and Waste 2016 GRI.
  8. GRI, 2020, GRI 306: Waste 2020.
  9. Joint Ministry concerned, 2021, K-ESG Guideline v1.0, Sejong, Korea.
  10. Kim, H, W., 2019, An Analysis of consumer reaction to the Attributes of Green Product : Focused on Natural Cosmetics, Ms. D. Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  11. Kim, J, S., Jun, Y, S., Cho, J, Y., 2021, Transition from linear economy to circular economy, Resources Recycling, 30(3), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.7844/kirr.2021.30.3.3
  12. Kim, J, W., Park, S, Y., Sung, Y, J., 2022, Constraints of sustainable consumption, Korean Consumption Culture Association, 105-131.
  13. Kim, L, J., Ryu, H, J., 2021, A Study of ESG disclosure and rating framework: Focusing on the environmental factor, Working Paper 2021-03, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong, Korea.
  14. LG H&H., 2021, ESG Report, Seoul, Korea.
  15. Lee, J, H., 2017, Effects of personal values and consumer consciousness regarding IT industry sustainability on consumer value and purchase intention, Korea Society of Information Technology Policy & Management, 9(4), 469-478.
  16. Lewis, H., Verghese, K., Fitzpatrick, L., 2010, Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: The plastic carry bag dilemma. Packaging Technology and Science, 23(3), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.886
  17. Lim, H, C., Jung, M, S., 2021, Strategies to expand SMEs ESG management through domestic and foreign ESG cases, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 12(4), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.12.4.202112.179
  18. Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., De Silva, K. M., 2022, ESG risk disclosure and the risk of green washing, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i1.10
  19. MOFADS., 2022, Cosmetic Production, Import, and Export Statistics in 2021, Sejong, Korea.
  20. MSCI, 2022, MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology: Packaging Materials & Waste Key Issue.
  21. Medical Newspaper, 2022, http://www.bosa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2180826.
  22. Nature Research Custom, 2022, Making up for lost time, 869-1068.
  23. Newstree, 2021, https://www.newstree.kr/newsView/ntr202104210005.
  24. Plastic Action, 2023, https://plastic-action.asia/.
  25. SASB, 2018, CONTAINERS & PACKAGING Sustainability Accounting Standard Containers & Packaging.
  26. Senadheera, S. S., Gregory, R., Rinklebe, J., Farrukh, M., Rhee, J. H., Ok, Y. S., 2022, The development of research on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Environment, 8(1).
  27. Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. D. L., 2009, How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.004
  28. Unilever, 2021, https://assets.unilever.com/files/92ui5egz/production/287881e6e4572af1bc2a1d3c97e3b4abd4e57ea1.pdf/USLP-summary-of-10-years-progress.pdf.
  29. Unilever, 2023, https://www.unilever.com/planet-and-society/sustainability-reporting-centre/sustainability-performance-data/.
  30. Yang, M, R., Jo, A, N., Woo, S, Y., Bae, C, H., 2022, The understanding of ESG management: Focused on celltrion, Korea Journal of Business Ethics, 22(1), 1-25.
  31. You, K, T., Seo Y, W., 2022, A Study on the effect of trust on sustainable management activities by CSV consumer awareness, Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review, 25(6), 47-60.
  32. Yuan, X., Wang, X., Sarkar, B., Ok, Y. S., 2021, The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates a shift to a plastic circular economy, Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2(10), 659-660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00223-2
  33. Zhu, J., Wang, C., 2020, Biodegradable plastics: Green hope or greenwashing? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161.