Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception on System of Information Ethics for AI Ethics Teacher Education

인공지능윤리 교사교육을 위한 정보윤리체계에 대한 인식

  • 한정혜 (청주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2023.05.24
  • Accepted : 2023.07.19
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Various studies on artificial intelligence ethics are being actively conducted, but considerations on terms and concepts of information ethics, computer ethics, Internet ethics, cyber ethics, and robot ethics are relatively insufficient. In this paper, we reviewed the concept of an information ethics framework that encompasses the ethics mentioned based on the platforms. Computer ethics and Internet ethics, recognized as the same concept, are the user's norms for Internet-connected software, cyber ethics are the norms between users in virtual space, and robot ethics are the norms of humans and robots in physical space. Additionally, teachers' perceptions of conceptual differences in related ethical terms were investigated based on the information ethics framework, and teacher training needs were investigated. In addition, teachers' perception of the importance of eight ethical standards (addiction, prevention, security, privacy, net ticket, public good, happiness, data fairness, human dignity, transparency, and safety) was investigated for cases based on human computer interaction in three information technology environments (communication platform, softbot, and robot).

인공지능윤리에 대한 다양한 연구가 활발하게 진행되고 있지만, 정보윤리, 컴퓨터윤리, 인터넷윤리, 사이버윤리, 로봇윤리에 대한 용어와 개념에 대한 고찰은 상대적으로 미흡하다. 이 논문에서는 이 윤리들을 아우르는 플랫폼기반 정보윤리체계를 정리하였다. 동일한 개념으로 인식되는 컴퓨터윤리와 인터넷윤리는 인터넷에 연결된 소프트웨어에 대한 사용자의 규범으로, 사이버윤리는 가상공간에서 사용자간의 규범으로, 로봇윤리는 물리적 공간에서 인간과 로봇의 규범으로 보았다. 또한 교사들의 관련 윤리 용어의 개념적 차이에 대한 인식을 조사하고, 이에 대한 교사연수 요구를 알아보았다. 그리고 정보윤리체제 안에서 인간컴퓨터상호작용에 기반한 세 가지 정보기술환경(커뮤니케이션 플랫폼, 소프트봇, 로봇)에 대하여 8가지 윤리기준(중독·예방, 보안·프라이버시, 넷티켓·공공선, 행복, 데이터공정성, 인간존엄성, 투명성, 안전성) 사례에 대한 교사들의 중요도 인식을 조사하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung, H. Y. (2023.3.17), Microsoft's all work tools are equipped with super-large AI 'Co-pilot, AI Times, https://www.aitimes.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=27588 (2023.3.17.)
  2. Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society., Massachusetts, Da Capo Press
  3. Maner, W. (1980). Starter kit in computer ethics. Helvetia Press and the National Information and Resource Center for Teaching Philosophy.
  4. Bynum, T. (2015). Computer and information ethics, Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/ethics-computer/ (accessed on 7 Aug 2022).
  5. Han, J. (2022). An information ethics framework based on ICT platforms. Information, 13(9), 440.
  6. Park, E. M.(2004), Sociality of Ethics and Existence of Morality, Philosophy and Reality, Autumn (62), 194-202.
  7. Onyancha, O. B. (2015). An informetrics view of the relationship between internet ethics, computer ethics and cyberethics. Library Hi Tech.
  8. Nam M.. J., Kim, J. H.,Hwang E. K. & Jin, C.(2021). .An Analysis on Changes of Information Ethics Education in Moral Education Curricular and Textbooks in Elementary Education Level. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction,21(3),661-690.
  9. Hauptman, R (1988). Ethical challenges in librarianship. Oryx Press,
  10. Tavani, H. T (1996). Cyberethics and the Future of Computing, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 26(2), 22-29 https://doi.org/10.1145/236394.236396
  11. Spinello, R. A. & Tavani, H. T (2004). Readings in cyberethics, Jones & Bartlett Learning,
  12. Floridi, L. (2005). Information ethics, its nature and scope. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society, 35(2), 3-3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1111646.1111649
  13. Froehlich (2005), T. A brief history of information ethics. Computer Society of India Communications Retrieved from https://bid.ub.edu/13froel2.htm
  14. Akbulut, Y., Sendag, S., Birinci, G., Kilicer, K., Sahin, M. C., & Odabasi, H. F. (2008). Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS). Computers & education, 51(1), 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003
  15. Brey, P., Soraker, J. H. (2009). Philosophy of computing and information technology. In Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. 1341-1407. North-Holland.
  16. Kuzu, (2009) A. Problems related to computer ethics: Origins of the problems and suggested solutions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505944.pdf
  17. Kavuk, M., Keser, H.,, Teker, N. (2011). Reviewing unethical behaviors of primary education students' internet usage. Proceeding of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.190
  18. Lau, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2014). Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences. Computers & Education, 72, 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.006
  19. Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K., & Wolf, M. J. (2010). Toward a model of trust and e-trust processes using object-oriented methodologies. The-backwards, forwards and sideways 265.
  20. Park, J. H.., & Han, J. H. (2018). Development of Educational Contents in Robot Ethics for Elementary Students. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.32823/JCIC.4.2.201808.143
  21. Tzafestas, S. G. (2018). Roboethics: Fundamental concepts and future prospects. Information, 9(6), 148.
  22. Smakman, M., Vogt, P., & Konijn, E. A. (2021). Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Computers & Education, 174, 104317.
  23. Han, J. H., & Kim, J. W. (2021). Ethical dilemma on educational usage of AI speaker. Journal of Creativity, Information, Culture, 7, 11-19.
  24. Berkman Klein Center. (2020). Ethics and Governance of AI. /https://cyber.harvard.edu/topics/ethics-andgovernance-ai
  25. Ministry of Education (August 11, 2022). Artificial intelligence, use it safely in the educational field!, https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/fileDown.do?m=020402&s=moe&fileSeq=18286f549dc44d87033c49e306be0f23
  26. Park, B. K. & Han, J. H. (2023). A Comparative analysis on training status enhancing digital and AI capacity for elementary school teachers, Journal of Information Education, 27(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.3.303
  27. Choi, Y. J. (2023.4.29.), Why AI is incredibly smart and shockingly stupid, TED, https://youtu.be/SvBR0OGT5VI