DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

노인 가구의 돌봄 실태 및 지역사회 계속 거주 영향 요인 분석 - 2020년도 노인실태조사 자료 분석을 중심으로 -

An Analysis of Status of Elderly Care on the Elderly Household and Factors of Aging in Place - In Case of the survey of Elderly in 2020 -

  • 김수이아 (국립제주대학교 대학원 건축공학과 ) ;
  • 김태일 (국립제주대학교 건축학과)
  • Kim, Suia (Dept. of Architecture Enginnering, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Taeil (Faculty of Architecture, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.08
  • 심사 : 2023.06.22
  • 발행 : 2023.10.30

초록

This study focuses on the survey of the elderly care for older persons restricted ADL/IADL and characteristics analysis of decision making factor for AIP as health status from 「The 2020 National Survey of the Living Conditions and Welfare Needs of Older Koreans」. The purpose of this study is to seeking for direction of care services based improvements of settlement environment for AIP. As a result of this study, there were the differences in the characteristics of households types of demographic & sociology, economic position, residential condition, health condition and support. Also, the elderly in need of help as require of ADL/IADL was most often helped by family living together, but there is a tendency for elderly who is in a delicate state of health to receive care from professional services. Last, there is deduction of statistically significant affecting 16 factors in the categories include demographic & sociology, residential characteristics, local living environment and social activity as physical health status. For AIP, this study suggest that the government should provide personalized public welfare to reflect characteristics of the elderly persons, operate service centers in different regions for adjusting housing supply and housing management and improve welfare policy in the way of local community revitalization.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2023학년도 제주대학교 교원성과지원사업에 의하여 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Chung, K. (2002). A Study on the factors influencing living arrangements of older parents, Health and Social Welfare Review, 22(1), 101-127.
  2. Granbom, M., Nkimbeng, M., Roberts, L., Gitlin, L., Taylor J., & Szanton, S. (2020). So I am stuck, but it's OK: residential reasoning and housing decision-making of low-income older adults with disabilities in Baltimore, mryland, Housing and Society, 41(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1816782
  3. Hwang, D., Park, J., & Yoon, J. (2014). Employment improvement programs for service of caregivers, Korea Labor Institute, 61-93.
  4. Jang, S., & Kawachi, I. (2019). Care inequality: care received according to gender, marital status, and socioeconomic status among korean older adults with disability, International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 105.
  5. Kang, H. (2018). The attempts and limits of "Defamilization" in social care for the elderly: based on the policy of long-term care insurance, Ewha Womans University.
  6. Kjaer, A., & Siren, A. (2019). Formal and informal care: trajectories of home care use among danish older adults, Ageing & Society, 1-24.
  7. Kim, J. (2017). Living arrangements and the distribution of multiple resources among korean older adul, Korea Journal of Population Studies, 40(1), 1-28.
  8. Kim, W., & Hong, S. (2020). A study on the concentration of power couples in large cities, The Seoul Institute, 21(2), 75-91.
  9. Kim, Y., Wook, J., & Song, K. (2021). A study on the important factors of physical aging friendly city environment for AIP(aging in place) in rural areas 50+, The Journal of Long Term Care, 9(2), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.32928/TJLTC.9.2.5
  10. Kwon, O., & Kim, J. (2019). Intention in aging in place of middle aged and elderly and differences in characteristics of related variables, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 30(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2019.30.3.077
  11. Lee, G., & Dwyer, J. (1996). Aging parent-adult child coresidence: further evidence on the role of parental characteristics, Journal of Family Issues, 17(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017001004
  12. Lee, S. (2019). Determinants of the elderly's economic level: focused on sex, age, education level, IPAID, 28(3), 27-58
  13. Lee, M. (2022). The effects of older persons' inclination to choose aging in place(AIP): focusing on Living arrangements, Korea Institute of Industry Convergence, 20(9), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.22678/JIC.2022.20.9.131
  14. Lee, Y., Kang, E., Kim, S., Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2017). Suggestion of long-term care system reform in view of aging in place(AIP), Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 170-174.
  15. MOHW, (2018). Community care, https://www.korea.kr/special/policyCurationView.do?newsId=148866645#L1.
  16. Park, D., & Kim, J. (2019). Housing type for elderly households: will elderly people continue to live in an apartment, Korea Real Estate Analysis Association, 27(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.19172/KREAA.27.2.6
  17. Park, J., & Ma, K. (2020). A study on aging in place and social relational factors, Korea Real Estate Society, 38(4), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.37407/kres.2020.38.4.5
  18. Seong, S. (2020). Analysis of the socio-spatial characteristics and factors of aging in place of the elderly in seoul, University of Seoul.
  19. Statistics Korea, (2022). Survey results on the elderly condition.
  20. Sun, T., & Kim, Y. (2021). The effect of elderly's housing environment on life satisfaction: focusing on the mediating effect of housing satisfaction. The Korean Academy of Long-Term Care, 9(1), 52-86.
  21. Sun, W., Kang, E., Lee, Y., Kim, J., Choi, I., & Yang, C. (2015). Role establishment and construction of continuum system between formal and informal providers in elderly care services, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 2016, 146-148.
  22. Yoon, H., Yoon, J., & Gim, Y. (2012). Factors affecting transitions in living arrangements among elders in korea, Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 64(1), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.20970/KASW.2012.64.1.011