DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary study for the development of radiation safety evaluation methodology for industrial kV-rated radiation generator facilities

  • Hye Sung Park (Department of Physics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Na Hye Kwon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sang Rok Kim (Radiation Safety & Section, KIRAMS) ;
  • Hwidong Yoo (Department of Physics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jin Sung Kim (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sang Hyoun Choi (Research Team of Radiological Physics and Engineering, KIRAMS) ;
  • Dong Wook Kim (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.03.31
  • Accepted : 2023.06.29
  • Published : 2023.10.25

Abstract

Background: This study aims to develop an evaluator that can quickly and accurately evaluate the shielding of low-energy industrial radiation generators. Methods: We used PyQt to develop a graphical user interface (GUI)-based program and employed the calculation methodology reported in the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)-49 for shielding calculations. We gathered the necessary factors for shielding evaluation using two libraries designed for Python, pandas and NumPy, and processed them into a database. We verified the effectiveness of the proposed program by comparing the results with those from safety reports of six domestic facilities. Results: After verifying the effectiveness of the program using the NCRP-49 example, we obtained an average error rate of 1.73%. When comparing the facility safety report and results obtained using the program, we found that the error rate was between 1.09% and 6.51%. However, facilities that did not use a defined shielding methodology were underestimated by 31.82% compared with the program (the final barrier thickness satisfied the shielding standard). Conclusion: The developed program provides a fast and accurate shielding evaluation that can assist personnel that work in radiation generator facilities and government officials in reviewing safety.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was presented at the International Conference on Nuclear Analytical Techniques in 2022 (NAT2022), which was held in Daejeon, from Dec. 7 to 9, 2022. This work was supported in part by Future Innovation-based Technology Radiation Research (RS-2022-00144201) and the Nuclear Safety Research Program (No. 2205013-0122-CG100) through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS), using financial resources granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea.

References

  1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Structural shielding design and evaluation for megavoltage x-and gamma-ray radiotherapy facilities, NCRP 151 (2006). 
  2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical Use of X Rays and Gamma Rays of Energies up to 10 MeV, vol. 49, NCRP, Bethesda, 1976. 
  3. American National Standards Institute (ANSI), ANSI/HPS N43.3. Installations Using Non-medical X-Ray and Sealed Gamma-Ray Sources, Energies up to 10 MeV, ANSI, 2008. 
  4. Na Hye Kwon, Hye Sung Park, Dong Wook Kim, Progress in Medical Physics 33 (4) (2022) 53-62.  https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2022.33.4.53
  5. E.D. Trout, J.P. Kelly, AC Lucas, Radiology 72 (1) (1959 Jan) 62-67.  https://doi.org/10.1148/72.1.62
  6. W. Miller, R.J. Kennedy, Radiology 65 (6) (1955 Dec) 920-925.  https://doi.org/10.1148/65.6.920
  7. Radiation Safety Management Integrated Information Network, Industry/regional Licensing Information on Radioisotopes. Daejeon Radiation Safety Management Integrated Information Network, 2023. Available from: https://rasis.kins.re.kr/. 
  8. Internatioanl Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities, IAEA safety report series No. 47, Vienna, 2006. 
  9. J.E. Martin, Physics for Radiation Protection, Wiley, WeinHeim, 2013. 
  10. Sang-Tae Kim, Simple calculation method as a supplementary radiation safety assessment for facility with radiation generator, International JOURNAL OF CONTENTS 14 (4) (2018) 65-69.  https://doi.org/10.5392/IJOC.2018.14.4.065
  11. C.R. Rhodes III, Development of an Automated Program for Calculating Radiation Shielding in a Radiotherapy Vault, Master's thesis, University of Toledo, OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, 2012, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=mco1331557547. 
  12. Z.E. Hassan, N.M. Farag, W.M. Elshemey, A versatile program for the calculation of linear accelerator room shielding, J. Radiol. Prot. 38 (2018) 666-677.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aab8aa
  13. Dong Hyeok Choi, Dong Wook Kim, Jin Sung Kim, Radiat. Phys. Chem., ISSN: 0969-806X, Vol: 201, Page: 110410. 
  14. Francis Newman, Masoud Asadi-Zeydabadi, Med. Phys. 35 (1) (2008, Jan) 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2818955