구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제39권3호
  • /
  • Pages.105-118
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치과 보철물 거래 플랫폼 서비스의 중요성과 요구사항: 치과 전문가 설문조사

Importance and requirements for dental prosthesis order platform services: a survey of dental professionals

  • 김규리 (경북대학교 일반대학원 치의과학과) ;
  • 손큰바다 (경북대학교 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과병원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김소연 (경북대학교 치과병원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 진명욱 (경북대학교 치과병원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소)
  • Gyu-Ri Kim (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Keunbada Son (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Du-Hyeong Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • So-Yeun Kim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Myoung-Uk Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kyu-Bok Lee (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.11
  • 심사 : 2023.07.20
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구는 치과 보철물 거래 플랫폼 서비스의 중요성을 이해하고, 보다 넓은 적용을 위해 필수 요소를 파악하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 치과 의사, 치과 기공사, 치과 위생사, 그리고 치과 산업 종사자들을 대상으로 치과 보철물 주문 및 관련 플랫폼 서비스에 대한 견해를 평가하기 위해 설문 조사를 실시하였다(총 53명). 이를 위해 설문지는 치과 전문가의 검토를 거쳐 작성되었고, Cronbach's alpha coefficient를 사용하여 설문지의 신뢰도를 평가하였다. 요인 분석을 통해 총 변동의 88.417%를 설명하는 5개 범주의 57개 요인을 도출했다. 설문 조사는 온라인 설문지 플랫폼을 통해 실시되었으며, 데이터 분석은 통계 소프트웨어를 사용하여 one-way analysis of variance과 Tukey's honestly significant difference test을 사용하여 수행되었다(α = 0.05). 결과: 주문 시에 정확한 정보 입력, 효과적인 의사소통, 변형 없는 치과 인상체 전달, 데이터 전송 및 저장의 편리성, 안정적이고 합리적인 가격의 플랫폼 서비스 제공이 필수 요소로 확인되었다(P < 0.05). 또한, 이러한 항목의 중요성에는 연령, 치과 직업, 경력 경험에 따른 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다(P < 0.05). 결론: 치과 보철물 주문 플랫폼 서비스에 대한 치과 종사자들의 요구사항은 안정성과 경제성, 그리고 치과 보철물 데이터 전송 및 저장의 용이성이었다. 이러한 결과는 앞으로 치과 보철물 주문 및 관련 플랫폼 서비스의 개발 및 개선을 위한 중요한 지표가 될 수 있다.

Purpose: This study aimed to gain better understanding of the importance of dental prosthesis order platform services and to identify the essential elements for their enhancement and wider adoption among dental professionals. Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted to assess the perspectives of dentists, dental technicians, dental hygienists, and dental industry professionals toward dental prosthesis ordering and associated platform services (a total of 53 respondents). The questionnaire was devised after an expert review and assessed for reliability using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Factor analysis revealed that 57 factors across five categories accounted for 88.417% of the total variance. The survey was administered through an online questionnaire platform, and data analysis was conducted using a statistical software, employing one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). Results: The essential elements identified were accurate information input, effective communication, delivery of distortion-free impressions, convenience in data transmission and storage, development of stable and affordable platform services (P < 0.05). Furthermore, significant differences were observed in the importance of these items based on age, dental profession, and career experience (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The dental prosthesis ordering platform services, the requirements of dental personnel were stability, economic efficiency, and ease of transmitting and storing prosthesis data. The findings can serve as important indicators for the development and improvement of dental prosthesis order platform services.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank the researchers at the Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University, for their time and contribution to the study. This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT, No.2022R1C1C2007040). This research was supported by the Bio Industry Technology Development Program of the Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (20018114)

참고문헌

  1. Bae JS, Chung MK. A surver of the actual conditions on the production of dental prosthesis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1995;33:358-94. 
  2. Kim JS, Lee HS. A study on remake of dental prosthesis according to dental laboratory characteristics (Focusing on Daegu and Gyeong-buk of dental lab). J Korean Acad Dent Tech 2011;33:227-36. 
  3. Kim RW, Jang GW, Heo YR, Son MK. Understanding and application of digital impression in dentistry. Korean J Dent Mater 2014;41:253-61.  https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2014.41.4.253
  4. Snel R, Van De Maele E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018;47:20180045. 
  5. Jahangiri L, Akiva G, Lakhia S, Turkyilmaz I. Understanding the complexities of digital dentistry integration in high-volume dental institutions. Br Dent J 2020;229:166-8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1928-5
  6. Valizadeh S, Valilai OF, Houshmand M, Vasegh Z. A novel digital dentistry platform based on cloud manufacturing paradigm. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2019;32:1024-42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1686170
  7. Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist: work authorization for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2006;15:123-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00086.x
  8. Berry J, Nesbit M, Saberi S, Petridis H. Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 1: communication methods. Br Dent J 2014;217:E12. 
  9. Afzal H, Ahmed N, Lal A, Al-Aali KA, Alrabiah M, Alhamdan MM, Albahaqi A, Sharaf A, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T. Assessment of communication quality through work authorization between dentists and dental technicians in fixed and removable prosthodontics. Appl Sci 2022;12:6263. 
  10. Lee BK. Operational situation If dental laboratories in Korea. J Tech Dent 1988;10:25-41. 
  11. Oh SG, Hwang GS, Lee CJ. A survey on the perception of the cause of failure of dental prosthesis manufacture by dental technicians. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2021;17:12-20.  https://doi.org/10.15236/ijcpd.2021.17.1.12
  12. Lee HG, Jo MH. A study on the dental field of present health insurance for custom-made prosthetic implant by dental technicians. J Tech Dent 2016;38:9-22.  https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.1.9
  13. Valizadeh S, Fatahi Valilai O, Houshmand M. Flexible flow line scheduling considering machine eligibility in a digital dental laboratory. Int J Prod Res 2020;58:6513-31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1683247
  14. Russo LL, Zhurakivska K, Guida L, Chochlidakis K, Troiano G, Ercoli C. Comparative cost-analysis for removable complete dentures fabricated with conventional, partial, and complete digital workflows. J Prosthet Dent 2022 May 31;S0022-3913(22)00204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.023. Online ahead of print. 
  15. Yang CJ, Chen MH, Lin KP, Cheng YJ, Cheng FC. Importing automated management system to improve the process efficiency of dental laboratories. Sensors 2020;20:5791. 
  16. O'Connell E, Fieldhouse S, Bryce GE, McColl E, Claridge D. Top tips in digital dentistry for primary care. Br Dent J 2022;233:446-8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-5050-8
  17. Fung L, Brisebois P. Implementing digital dentistry into your esthetic dental practice. Dent Clin North Am 2020;64:645-57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2020.07.003
  18. Na JS. Development of measurement scale for dental laboratories service quality. J Tech Dent 2018;40:151-62. 
  19. Chua HN, Wong SF, Low YC, Chang Y. Impact of employees' demographic characteristics on the awareness and compliance of information security policy in organizations. Telemat Inform 2018;35:1770-80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.05.005
  20. van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J 2013;215:E21. 
  21. Mendelson DS, Erickson BJ, Choy G. Image sharing: evolving solutions in the age of interoperability. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:1260-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.013
  22. Mokhamed T, Talib MA, Moufti MA, Abbas S, Khan F. The potential of blockchain technology in dental healthcare: a literature review. Sensors 2023;23:3277. 
  23. Stein CD, Eisenberg ES, O'Donnell JA, Spallek H. What dental educators need to understand about emerging technologies to incorporate them effectively into the educational process. J Dent Educ 2014;78:520-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.4.tb05702.x