인지과학 (Korean Journal of Cognitive Science)

한국인지과학회 (The Korean Society for Cognitive Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

얼굴 표정 정서가 전환 과제 수행에 미치는 영향: 동서양 문화차

How facial emotion affects switching cost: Eastern and Western cultural differences

  • 태진이 (광주과학기술원 기초교육학부) ;
  • 남예은 (영남대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 이윤형 (영남대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 손명호 (조지워싱턴대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 김태훈 (경남대학교 심리학과)
  • Jini Tae (Division of Liberal Arts and Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Yeeun Nam (Department of Psychology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Yoonhyoung Lee (Department of Psychology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Myeong-ho Sohn (Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, George Washington University) ;
  • Tae-hoon Kim (Department of Psychology, Kyungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.14
  • 심사 : 2023.09.05
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 전환 과제 수행 시 정서 정보의 영향을 비교 문화적 관점에서 살펴보는 것이다. 보다 구체적으로 본 연구에서는 긍정 정서와 부정 정서를 표현하고 있는 사진을 사용하여 전환 과제 수행 시 정소 정보의 영향이 한국인들과 미국인들에게서 다르게 나타나는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 한국대학생들과 미국 대학생들에게 긍정 혹은 부정 얼굴을 제시하고 제시된 사진의 테두리 색깔에 맞춰 정서판단 과제 혹은 성별 판단 과제를 수행하도록 요구하였다. 실험 결과, 한국인과 미국인 모두 성별 과제에서 정서 과제로의 전환 비용이 성별 과제에서 정서 과제로의 전환 비용에 비해 유의미하게 크게 나타났고, 사진에서 표현하는 정서가 반복되는 조건이 정서가 전환되는 조건에 비해 더 큰 전환 비용을 보였다. 또한, 참가자의 문화적 배경과 무관하게 과제와 정서가 직접적으로 관련된 정서 과제가 성별 과제에 비해 정서 전환 여부에 따른 전환 비용이 더 크게 나타났다. 하지만, 정서 전환이 전환 과제 수행에 미치는 영향을 개인이 속한 문화에 따라 달랐는데, 한국인이 미국인에 비해 사진에서 표현되는 정서의 전환 여부에 덜 민감하게 반응하였다. 이러한 결과는 정서 정보가 인지과제 수행에 영향을 준다는 것을 보여주며 정서의 영향이 개인이 속하고 자라온 문화적 배경에 따라 다를 수 있음을 시사한다.

This study aimed to examine the influence of emotional information on task switching performance from a cross-cultural perspective. Specifically we investigated whether the impact of affective information differs between Koreans and Caucasian when they perform a switching task using pictures that express positive and negative emotions. In this study, Korean and Caucasian college students were presented with either positive or negative faces and asked to perform either an emotion or a gender judgment task based on the color of the picture frame. The results showed that the switching cost from the gender judgment task to the emotion task was significantly larger than the switching cost from the gender task to the emotion task for both Koreans and Caucasians. This asymmetric switching cost was maintained when the previous and current pictures showed the same emotion but disappeared when two images presented different emotions. Regardless of the participant's cultural background, switching costs were greater for emotional tasks where the emotion was directly related to the task than for gender tasks. However, the effect of emotional switching on switching costs varied by the individual's background. Koreans were less sensitive to whether poser's emotion was changed than Americans. These results demonstrate that emotional information affects cognitive task performance and suggest that the effects of emotion may differ depending on the individual's cultural background.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 대한민국 교육부(NRF-2020S1A3A2A02103899) 지원에 의해 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. 김민우, 최준식, & 조양석 (2011). 고려대학교얼굴표정모음집(KUFEC)과 의미미분법을 통한 정서차원평정. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(4), 1189-1211.
  2. Aboulafia-Brakha, T., Manuel, A. L., & Ptak, R. (2016). Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates affective flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 86, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.030
  3. Arbuthnott, K. D. (2008). Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 62(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.62.2.91
  4. Berger, N., Richards, A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2019). Delayed reconfiguration of a non-emotional task set through reactivation of an emotional task set in task switching: an ageing study. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1567462
  5. Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7(1), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30
  6. Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(8), 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1724
  7. Cheung, R. Y. M., & Park, I. J. K. (2010). Anger suppression, interdependent self-construal, and depression among Asian American and European American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020655
  8. De Vries, M., & Geurts, H. M. (2012). Cognitive flexibility in ASD; task switching with emotional faces. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 42(12), 2558-2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1512-1
  9. Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2011). Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching study. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 336.
  10. Gul, A., & Khan, K. (2014). Emotion regulation strategies can predict task-switching abilities in euthymic bipolar patients. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 847.
  11. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(6), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
  12. Hess, U., Adams, R. B., Grammer, K., & Kleck, R. E. (2009). Face gender and emotion expression: Are angry women more like men?. Journal of Vision, 9(12), 19, 1-8.
  13. Hsieh, S., & Lin, S. J. (2019). The Dissociable Effects of Induced Positive and Negative Moods on Cognitive Flexibility. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2
  14. Johnson, D. R. (2009). Emotional attention set-shifting and its relationship to anxiety and emotion regulation. Emotion, 9(5), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017095
  15. Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(4), 785-800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
  16. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Ohman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neutoscience, Psychology Section.
  17. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 39(1), 55-74.
  18. Mauss, I. B., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Emotion suppression and cardiovascular disease: Is hiding your feeling bad for your heart? In I. Nyklicek, L. R. Temoshok, & A. Vingerhoets (Eds.), Emotional expressions and health: Advances in theory, assessment, and clinical application (pp. 62-81). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
  19. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
  20. Murata, A., Moser, J. S., & Kitayama, S. (2013). Culture shapes electrocortical responses during emotion suppression. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 8(5), 595-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss036
  21. Nusbaum, A. T., Wilson, C. G., Stenson, A., Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., Zwaan, R., & Madan, C. (2018). Induced positive mood and cognitive flexibility: Evidence from task switching and reversal learning. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 25.
  22. Paulitzki, J. R., Risko, E. F., Oakman, J. M., & Stolz, J. A. (2008). Doing the unpleasant: How the emotional nature of a threat-relevant task affects task-switching. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.003
  23. Philipp, A. M., Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440600758812
  24. Posamentier, M. T., & Abdi, H. (2003). Processing faces and facial expressions. Neuropsychology review, 13(3), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025519712569
  25. Reeck, C., & Egner, T. (2015). Emotional task management: neural correlates of switching between affective and non-affective task-sets. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 10(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu153
  26. Schuch, S., Werheid, K., & Koch, I. (2012). Flexible and inflexible task sets: Asymmetric interference when switching between emotional expression, sex, and age classification of perceived faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 994-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.638721
  27. Varnum, M. E., & Hampton, R. S. (2017). Cultures differ in the ability to enhance affective neural responses. Social Neuroscience, 12(5), 594-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1209239
  28. Wang, Y., Chen, J., & Yue, Z. (2017). Positive emotion facilitates cognitive flexibility: An fMRI study. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1832.
  29. Yang, H., & Yang, S. (2014). Positive affect facilitates task switching in the dimensional change card sort task: Implications for the shifting aspect of executive function. Cognition and Emotion, 28(7), 1242-1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.879053
  30. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 29(2), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.455