DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Adult Male Hand Shape for the Development of Work Gloves

작업용 장갑 개발을 위한 성인 남성 손 형태 분석

  • Sujoung Cha (Dept. of Fashion & Clothing, Mokpo National University)
  • 차수정 (국립목포대학교, 패션의류학과)
  • Received : 2023.07.11
  • Accepted : 2023.09.07
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

This study aimed to classify the hand types of adult males aged 20 to 69 years using three-dimensional measurement data from the 2020 8th Korean Anthropometric Survey, the latest measurement data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology Size Korea, and explore the characteristics of each type. Through this, I aimed to draw implications for the development of work gloves. The factors that make up an adult male's hand were categorized into hand and finger thickness factors, palm length factors, and finger length factors. Adult male hands were categorized into four types: small, thin hands and long fingers; thick, long fingers; medium, short hands and fingers; and large, thin, short fingers. The analysis showed that the younger the age, the more slender and long the hands and fingers, and as age increased, hands and fingers became shorter and thicker. Implications for the development of work gloves included the need for size segmentation based on the age of the work glove user, changes in the way glove dimensions are set based on hand length and hand circumference, and the need to segment gloves by the type of work. Hand typing in future research should be done according to occupational groups, and glove patterns should be developed for each type of work based on the results of this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbar-Khanzadeh, F., Bisesi, M. S., & Rivas, R. D. (1995). Comfort of personal protective equipment. Applied Ergonomics, 26(3), 195-198. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00017-7
  2. Aless, F. M., Nimbarte, A. D., & Sosa, E. M. (2020). Incidences and severity of wrist, hand, and finger injuries in the U.S. mining industry. Safety Science, 129, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104792
  3. Bradley, J. V. (1969). Effect of gloves on control operation time. Human Factors, 11(1), 13-20. doi: 10.1177/001872086901100104
  4. Breisch, S. B. (1989). "PPE: What is ahead?" Safety & Health, 140(6), 48-52.
  5. Choi, E. H., & Do, W. H. (2013). Analysis on hand types of elderly women. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 15(4), 574-582. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.4.574
  6. Choi, H. S., & Kim, E. K. (2004). The database development of 2-D and 3-D hands measurement for improving fitness of gloves-Focused on the classification of hand type and analysis fo 3-D hand shape. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(10), 1300-1311.
  7. Dianat, I., Haslegrave, C. M., & Stedmon, A. W. (2012a). Methodology for evaluating gloves in relation to the effects on hand performance capabilities: A literature review. Ergonomics, 55(11), 1429-1451. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.708058
  8. Dianat, I., Haslegrave, C. M., & Stedmon, A. W. (2012b). Using pliers in assembly work: Short and long task duration effects of gloves on hand performance capabilities and subjective assessments of discomfort and ease of tool manipulation. Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.016
  9. Dianat, I., Haslegrave, C. M., & Stedmon, A. W. (2014). Design options for improving protective gloves for industrial assembly work. Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 1208-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.009
  10. 5 Considerations for choosing the right safety gloves. (July 1, 2019). Grainger. Retrieved 20 July, 2023, from https://www.grainger.com/know-how/safety/ppe-in-the-workplace/ppe-management/kh-safety-glove-size-chart-qt-306
  11. Hands. (n.d.). Namu Wiki. Retrieved June 20, 2023, from https://namu.wiki/w/%EC%86%90
  12. Hand and finger shape by type. (n.d.). [Photograph]. Size Korea. Retrieved August 20, 2023, from https://sizekorea.kr/human-meas-search/3d-human-shape/intro
  13. Jeon, E. (2021). An analysis of hand measurements for designing size specification for children's gloves. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 45(6), 923-934. doi: 10.5850/JKSCT.2021.45.6.923
  14. Kim, E. K. (2004). A study on the hand characteristics required to develop a sizing system for gloves(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  15. Kim, S. H., & Kee, D. H. (2012). Classification and identification of Korean hand shapes based on anthropometric hand data analysis. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 14(1), 75-85. doi: 10.12812/ksms.2012.14.1.075
  16. Kwon, C. R., Jang, M., Jeong, D. W., & Kim, D. E. (2019). Hand sizing study for development of firefighting gloves. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 43(3), 416-426. doi: 10.5850/JKSCT.2019.43.3.416
  17. LaBar, G. (1990). OSHA plans updates of PPE rules. Occupational Hazards, 52(6), 51-53.
  18. Lee, K. Y., An, H. S., Lee, I. S., Lee, T. Y., & Syn, H. Y. (2017). A study on the development of safety gloves design for rescue workers. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 23(4), 609-618. doi: 10.18208/ksdc.2017.23.4.609
  19. Lim, J. Y. (2005). Classification of hand types for the development of glove patterns. Human Ecology Research, 43(8), 115-122.
  20. Mandahawi, N., Imrhan, S., Al-Shobak, S., & Sarder, B. (2008). Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11-12), 966-976. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.010
  21. Putter, C. E., Selles, R. W., Polnder, S., Panneman, M. J. M., Hovius, S. E. R., & Van Beeck, E. F. (2012). Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: Health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 94(9), doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00561
  22. Ryu, K. O., & Suh, M. A. (2004). A comparative study on the measurement of Korean adult hand for glove pattern-making. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 12(6), 897-907.
  23. Yao, Y., Rakheja, S., Gauvin, C., Marcotte, P., & Hamouda, K. (2018). Evaluation of effects of anti-vibration gloves on manual dexterity. Ergonomics, 61(11), 1530-1544. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1497208