서비스연구 (Journal of Service Research and Studies)

  • 제13권3호
  • /
  • Pages.20-38
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2234-2850(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1813(eISSN)
서비스사이언스학회 (The Society of service Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보품질과 자기효능감이 카셰어링 재이용의도에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Information Quality and Self-efficacy on Car-sharing Usage Intention

  • 투고 : 2023.08.13
  • 심사 : 2023.09.11
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 공유경제 서비스 중 가장 주목할 만한 성장을 보이고 있는 카셰어링 서비스의 재이용의도를 분석하는 과정에서 차량의 예약, 결재, 인계, 검수, 반납 등 모든 과정이 비대면 셀프서비스로 이루어지는 서비스의 독특한 특성을 반영하고자 하였다. 이에, 서비스에 대해 지각하는 혜택과 위험 요인과 더불어, '정보품질'이라는 플랫폼의 특성과 '자기효능감'이라는 개인 특성 변수의 역할을 함께 고려하였다. 자료 수집을 위하여 카셰어링 이용경험이 있는 성인을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였고, 총 320명의 응답이 분석에 사용되었다. 구조방정식모형 분석 결과, 정보품질 및 자기효능감은 서비스의 지각된 혜택을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났으며, 정보품질이 우수할수록 자기효능감 또한 높이 지각하는 것으로 분석되었다. 반면, 정보품질 및 자기효능감이 지각된 위험을 낮추는 역할은 미미하였으며 서비스 재이용의도는 지각된 위험 보다는 지각된 혜택에 의한 영향을 더 크게 받는 것으로 나타나, 소비자들이 카셰어링 이용 시 위험을 크게 인식하지 않는 것으로 이해되었다. Process Macro를 이용하여 매개효과를 추가 분석한 결과, 자기효능감이 재이용의도에 미치는 영향은 지각된 혜택에 의해 매개되는 것으로 나타났다. 정보품질이 지각된 혜택 또는 자기효능감을 매개로 재이용의도에 미치는 간접 효과는 모두 유의한 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 결과는 플랫폼에서 이용자가 필요로 하는 정보를 적시에, 충분히, 이해하기 쉽게 제공해주는 것은 자기효능감을 향상시켜 서비스 재이용의도를 증가시키는 것을 시사한다. 카셰어링 서비스 기업은 고객이 차량을 더욱 쉽게 이용하고 커뮤니케이션 문제로 인한 분쟁이 발생하지 않도록 우수한 품질의 정보를 평소 잘 제공하는 것이 중요하다고 하겠다.

Recently, car sharing has shown the most remarkable growth among sharing economy services. In the process of analyzing the intention to reuse the car sharing service, this study tried to reflect the unique characteristics of the service, which consists of non-face-to-face self-service, such as reservation, approval, handover, inspection, and return of the vehicle. Specifically, in addition to the perceived benefits and the perceived risks, we considered 'information quality' as a platform characteristic and 'self-efficacy' as a personal characteristic. To collect data, an online survey was conducted on adults with experience in car sharing, and a total of 320 responses were used for analysis. As a result of analyzing the structural equation model, it was found that information quality and self-efficacy increased the perceived benefits of services, and the higher the information quality, the higher the self-efficacy. On the other hand, the role of information quality and self-efficacy in lowering perceived risks was insignificant, and the intention to reuse services was more affected by perceived benefits than perceived risks. As a result of further analysis using Process Macro, it was found that the effect of self-efficacy on reuse intention was mediated by perceived benefits. It was analyzed that the indirect effects of information quality on reuse intention through perceived benefits or self-efficacy were all significant. These results suggest that providing timely, sufficient, and easy-to-understand information required by users on the platform improves self-efficacy and increases service reuse intention. In order to increase the number of service users, it is important for service providers not only to provide promotional activities such as offering attractive prices, but also to provide high-quality information so that users can use it more easily.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, pp. 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  2. An, K., and Joo, J. (2017). Factors Influencing Intention to Use Kakao Taxi as a O2O Service. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), pp. 87-105.
  3. Bagozzi, R.P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), pp. 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), pp. 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.
  6. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), pp. 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
  7. Bauer, R.A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. IL American Marketing.
  8. Byun, S., and Byun, S-E. (2013). Exploring perceptions toward biometric technology in service encounters, Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(3), pp. 217-230.
  9. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
  10. Dash, S., and Saji, K. (2008). The role of consumer self-efficacy and website social-presence in customers' adoption of B2C online shopping: An empirical study in the Indian context. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 20(2), pp. 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v20n02_04
  11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Dowling, G.R., and Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), pp. 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
  13. Eom, H (2000). A Study on the measurement of service quality in information systems. Korean Corporation Management Review, 7(1), pp. 155-180.
  14. Featherman, M.S., and Hajli, N. (2016). Self-service technologies and e-services risks in social commerce era. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(2), pp. 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2614-4
  15. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  16. Ghasemaghaei, M., and Hassanein, Khaled (2016). A macro model of online information quality perceptions: A review and synthesis of the literature, Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), pp. 972-991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.027
  17. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  18. Hellier, P.K., Geursen, G.M., Carr, R.A., and Rickard, J.A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11), pp. 1762-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456
  19. Hong, S., and Han, S. (2023). The effect of Untact shopping customer experience on continuous use intention through Expectation-Confirmation Model. Journal of Service Research and Studies. 13(2), pp. 227-245.
  20. Joo, J. (2017). Motives for participating in sharing economy: Intentions to use car sharing services. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(2), pp. 21-26.
  21. Jun, J., Lee, T., Chung, S., and Park, C. (2017). A study on determinants of intention to use car sharing: Moderating effect of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing Management Research. 22(2), pp. 49-66.
  22. Keith, M.J., Babb, J.S., Lowry, P.B., Furner, C.P., and Abdullat, A. (2015). The role of mobile-computing self-efficacy in consumer information disclosure. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), pp. 637-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12082
  23. Kim, M. and Rhee, H. (2019). Factors affecting overall satisfaction on car sharing service: Satisfaction on service quality, satisfaction on service product, satisfaction on service experience. Journal of Service Research and Studies, 9(3), pp. 17-38.
  24. Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., and Rao, H.R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), pp. 544-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
  25. Kim, H.-W., Chan, H.C., and Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), pp. 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  26. Kim, J. and Han, I. (2020). The case study on the success factors of Korean car sharing business. Knowledge Management Research, 21(3), pp. 1-25.
  27. Lee, A.E. (2021). Investigating factors affecting intention to continue using car-sharing services: Focusing on user attitudes, platform quality, concerns for information privacy, and innovativeness. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 21(6), pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2021.12.21.6.75
  28. Lee, S.S. (2017). A Study on consumer sharing economy service usage attitudes and usage intentions. Family and Environment Research, 55(2), pp. 105-124. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2017.009
  29. Lee, H. (2020). Analyzing Moderated Mediation Effect with Process Macro, ShinYoungSa.
  30. Lim, N. (2003). Consumers' perceived risk: Sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(3), pp. 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00025-5
  31. Lin, H.-F. (2007). The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in the B2C e-commerce context. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(4), pp. 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701231302
  32. Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y., and Johnson, R.D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), pp. 126-163. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.126
  33. McDonald, T. and Siegall, M. (1992). The effects of technological self-efficacy and job focus on job performance, attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 126(5), pp. 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543380
  34. Nicolaou, A.I., and Mcknight, D.H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17, pp. 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0103
  35. Moon, H.J. and Hwang, W.J. (2020). Role of the platform in car-sharing and ride-sharing services and consumer remedies. Journal of Consumer Law, 6(1), 163-189. pp. 163-189.
  36. Park, S. and Lee, J. (2022). The effect of customers' perceived value on continuance intention in the sharing economy: A mediation of attachment and perceived usefulness. Korean Management Review, 51(3), 729~759.
  37. Park, K., and Song, I. (2019). A Study of perceived value and intention to use for car sharing service: Based on user experiences serviced by Seoul Car Sharing. Journal of Internet Computing and Services. 20(2), pp. 109-118.
  38. Park, Y., and Han, M. (2001). The Effects of perceived risk and perceived quality on the consumer's online buying behavior. Korean Journal of Marketing, 16(1), pp. 59-84.
  39. Preacher, K.J., and Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), pp. 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  40. Peter, J.P., and Tarpey, L.X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1). pp. 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1086/208613
  41. Ryu, H.-S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), pp. 541-569.
  42. Sanchez, R.A., and Hueros, A.D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), pp. 1632-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011
  43. Song, S. (2015). The study on sharing economy services and consumer's rights promotion plan. Korea Consumer Agency, Policy Analysis, pp. 15-08.
  44. Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., and Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), pp. 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
  45. Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., and Wang, J. (2019). Understanding consumers' willingness to use ride-sharing services: The roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, pp. 504-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.044
  46. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., and Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), pp. 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203
  47. Zhao, S., Fang, Y., Zhang, W., and Jiang, H. (2020). Trust, perceived benefit, and purchase intention in C2C E-Commerce: an empirical examination in China. Journal of Global Information Management, 28(1), pp. 121-141. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.2020010107
  48. Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., and Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users' continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 56, pp. 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008
  49. Zhu, G., Zheng, J., and Chen, Y. (2021). Acceptance of free-floating car sharing: A decomposed self-efficacy-based value adoption model. Transportation Letters, 14(5), pp. 524-534.