DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparison study of vessel twisting by different microsurgical suture techniques in a chicken wing artery side to side bypass training model

  • Junho Jung (Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Donghwan Jeong (Department of Neurosurgery, Danwon Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.01.19
  • Accepted : 2023.04.18
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Objective: Microvascular anastomosis, particularly side-to-side (STS) bypass, is a complex surgical procedure. While several suture techniques exist, none of them is superior to the others. We assessed the association between various STS bypass techniques and vessel twisting using chicken wing training models. Methods: Three suture techniques were compared over an anterior wall suture procedure. The unidirectional continuous suture (UCS) group used a downward "right-to-left" continuous suture. The reverse continuous suture (RCS) group used a downward "left-to-right" continuous suture. The interrupted suture (IS) group used the standard interrupted suture. The number of samples in each of the three groups was 30 (n=90). We compared the incidence of vessel twisting and rotation angles across groups. Results: Vessel twisting occurred in 96.7%, 56.7%, and 0% of the cases in the UCS, IS, and RCS groups, respectively. The incidence of vessel twisting differed significantly in all 3 groups (p<0.001), with an apparent trend (p=0.002). The mean rotation angles were 201°±90.6°, 102°±107.6°, and 0° in the UCS, IS, and RCS groups, respectively, which were significantly different (p<0.001). On excluding cases without twisting, the rotation angles of twisted vessels in the UCS and IS groups were 207.9°±83.7° and 180°±77.9°, respectively, which yielded a significant difference between these groups (p<0.001). Conclusions: We found that the incidence and trend of vessel twisting differed significantly across suture techniques. The RCS technique may aid in preventing vessel twisting in the STS bypass procedure.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was approved by a local institutional review board (NON2021-002). We thank Youngmi Kim for drawing works.

References

  1. Abla AA, Lawton MT. Anterior cerebral artery bypass for complex aneurysms: An experience with intracranial-intracranial reconstruction and review of bypass options. J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1364-77. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.JNS132219
  2. Au YK, Mahjoub SB, Hart JC. Suture patterns and corneal graft rotation in the cadaver eye. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990 Jul;21(7):472-4. https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-19900701-05
  3. Bot GM, Zhao X, McElenney BK, Tayebi Meybodi A, Belykh E, Lawton MT, et al. Comparative analysis of continuous suturing, interrupted suturing, and cyanoacrylate-based lid techniques for end-to-end microvascular anastomosis: Laboratory investigation. World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.054
  4. Chen YX, Chen LE, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis. J Hand Surg Am. 2001 May;26(3):530-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.22933
  5. Grigore FN, Amin-Hanjani S. A3-A3 bypass surgery for aneurysm: Technical nuances. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Sep;17(3):277-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy355
  6. Hafez A, Huhtakangas J, Muhammad S, Lawton MT, Tanikawa R, Niemela M. The identification of factors that influence the quality of bypass anastomosis and an evaluation of the usefulness of an experimental practical scale in this regard. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;121:e119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.031
  7. Hino A. Training in microvascular surgery using a chicken wing artery. Neurosurgery. 2003 Jun;52(6):1495-7; discussion 1497-8.
  8. Kalani MY, Zabramski JM, Hu YC, Spetzler RF. Extracranial-intracranial bypass and vessel occlusion for the treatment of unclippable giant middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72(3):428-35; discussion 435-6. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182804381
  9. Kalani MY, Zabramski JM, Nakaji P, Spetzler RF. Bypass and flow reduction for complex basilar and vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2013 May;72(5):763-75; discussion 775-6.
  10. Kawashima M, Rhoton AL Jr, Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A, Fujii K. Microsurgical anatomy of cerebral revascularization. Part I: Anterior circulation. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan;102(1):116-31. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0116
  11. Kawashima M, Rhoton AL Jr, Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A, Fujii K. Microsurgical anatomy of cerebral revascularization. Part II: Posterior circulation. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan;102(1):132-47. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0132
  12. Klein SR, Goldberg L, Miranda RM, Bosco P, Nelson RJ, White RA. Effect of suture technique on arterial anastomotic compliance. Arch Surg. 1982 Jan;117(1):45-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380250027006
  13. Lawton MT, Abla AA, Rutledge WC, Benet A, Zador Z, Rayz VL, et al. Bypass surgery for the treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms: A work in progress. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):83-99. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001175
  14. Levi MA, Harb AA, Nicolas CF, Corvi JJ, Kozato A, Akelina Y, et al. Torsion is tolerated in arterial end to venous side anastomoses in the rat model. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Sep;36(7):501-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709478
  15. Olabe J, Olabe J. Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model. Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec;72(6):695-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.12.008
  16. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Lawton MT. In situ bypass in the management of complex intracranial aneurysms: Technique application in 13 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1442-9. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000333808.64530.DD
  17. Ramanathan D, Hegazy A, Mukherjee SK, Sekhar LN. Intracranial in situ side-to-side microvascular anastomosis: Principles, operative technique, and applications. World Neurosurg. 2010 Apr;73(4):317-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.01.025
  18. Rennert RC, Strickland BA, Radwanski RE, Ravina K, Chien M, Russin JJ. Running-to-interrupted microsuture technique for vascular bypass. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 Oct;15(4):412-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx263
  19. Ryu J, Chung Y, Lee SH, Cho WS, Choi SK. In situ side-toside anastomosis: Surgical technique and complication avoidance. World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:336-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.087
  20. Sanai N, Zador Z, Lawton MT. Bypass surgery for complex brain aneurysms: An assessment of intracranial-intracranial bypass. Neurosurgery. 2009 Oct;65(4):670-83; discussion 683. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000348557.11968.F1
  21. Tayebi Meybodi A, Huang W, Benet A, Kola O, Lawton MT. Bypass surgery for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: An algorithmic approach to revascularization. J Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;127(3):463-79. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.JNS16772
  22. Terry MA, Li J, Goshe J, Davis-Boozer D. Endothelial keratoplasty: The relationship between donor tissue size and donor endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):1944-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.023
  23. Tiwari A, Cheng KS, Salacinski H, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Improving the patency of vascular bypass grafts: The role of suture materials and surgical techniques on reducing anastomotic compliance mismatch. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;25(4):287-95. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1810
  24. Topalan M, Bilgin SS, Ip WY, Chow SP. Effect of torsion on microarterial anastomosis patency. Microsurgery. 2003;23(1):56-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.10092
  25. Vajpayee RB, Sharma V, Sharma N, Panda A, Taylor HR. Evaluation of techniques of single continuous suturing in penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb;85(2):134-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.2.134
  26. Wang L, Cai L, Qian H, Lawton MT, Shi X. The in situ side-to-side bypass technique: A comprehensive review of the technical characteristics, current anastomosis approaches, and surgical experience. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:357-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.173