DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Christian Liberal Arts to Cultivate Religious Literacy

종교 리터러시를 함양하는 기독교 교양교육 연구

  • Received : 2023.11.26
  • Accepted : 2023.12.29
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

Purpose of study: The purpose of this study is to explore the direction of the role of Christian liberal arts education in university liberal arts education in the 21st century. Research content and method: It examines how liberal arts education has changed with the times, and examines the modern significance of the role of liberal arts education that is requested today. In the rapidly changing reality of the 21st century, the role of liberal arts education, which was neglected by focusing on major-centered professional education, has become important. The need for creative and integrated thinking skills to create and apply new knowledge on their own has been highlighted. Liberal arts education and Christianity have a common denominator, and they can produce richer fruits through mutual communication. Religious literacy is the ability to identify and analyze the fundamental intersection between religion and social, political, and cultural life through various lenses. It can be said that it is the culture that must be equipped as a democratic citizen living in the 21st century. Understanding religion is the most important humanities and culture. Through the cultivation of religious literacy, it will be possible to develop thinking skills and insights to view the relationship between Christianity and various fields of life as a whole. Conclusions and Suggestions: Through this study, the need for religious literacy was expressed, and the direction of Christian liberal arts education requested in this era was sought. Christian liberal arts education that fosters religious literacy is proposed as a way to handle the role of a holistic leader of public society by aiming for convergent thinking and promoting public responsibility.

연구 목적 : 본 연구는 21세기의 대학 교양교육에 있어, 기독교 교양교육의 역할에 대한 방향을 모색하는 데에 그 목적이 있다. 종교 리터러시를 함양하는 기독교 교양교육을 통해 융복합적 사고를 지향하고 민주시민으로서 공적 책임감을 고취시킬 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 연구 내용 및 방법 : 교양교육의 역사와 현황을 살펴보면서 교양교육이 시대에 따라 어떻게 변화되어왔는지 고찰하고, 오늘날 요청되는 교양교육의 역할에 대한 현대적 의의를 되짚어보았다. 21세기의 급변하는 현실 속에서 전공 중심의 전문교육에 치중하여 소홀히 여겨졌던 교양교육의 역할이 중요해졌다. 새로운 지식을 스스로 창출하고 응용할 수 있는 창의적이고 통합적인 사고능력의 필요성이 부각된 것이다. 교양교육과 기독교는 공통분모를 가지고 있으며, 상호 간 소통을 통해 더욱 풍성한 열매를 맺을 수 있다. 다양한 렌즈를 통해 종교와 사회, 정치, 문화적 생활 사이의 근본적 교차점을 식별하고 분석할 수 있는 종교 리터러시는 21세기를 살아가는 민주시민으로서 갖추어야 할 교양이라고 할 수 있다. 오랜 역사 가운데 다양한 영향을 끼쳐 왔으며 지금도 사회와 밀접한 관계에 있는 종교에 대한 이해는 가장 중요한 인문 교양으로, 종교 리터러시의 함양을 통해 기독교와 삶의 다양한 분야의 관계를 전체적으로 조망할 수 있는 사고능력과 통찰력을 기를 수 있게 될 것이다. 결론 및 제언 : 본 연구를 통해 종교 리터러시의 필요성을 피력하고, 이 시대에 요청되는 기독교 교양교육의 방향을 모색하였다. 융복합적 사고를 지향하며 공적 책임감을 고취시킴으로써 공적 사회의 전인적인 지도자 역할을 감당할 수 있는 하나의 방안으로 종교 리터러시를 함양하는 기독교 교양교육을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon, S. Y. et al. 13 (ed). (2019). Christianity, question & response. Seoul: cheongsong media.
  2. Kim, K. S. (2008). A Study on the Direction of Liberal Arts Education in the Christian University. Korea society for christian education & information technology, 21, 135-163.
  3. Kim, D. I. (2018). A Study on the Utilization of Christian culture Classes through PBL(Project Based Learning). The ology and the Gospel, 5, 135-163.
  4. Kim, J. H. & Lee, I. K. (2019). Suggestions for the Development of Christian Culture Education. Korea Academy of Christianity and Liberal Arts Conference, 1, 28-45.
  5. No, K. B. (2010). Policy suggestions for the promotion of university liberal arts education. Seoul: National Research council for economics humanities and social sciences.
  6. Park, M. S. (2009). A New Paradigm of Christian Liberal Arts Education for Cultivation of Humanity-Focused on the Theory of J. A. Comenius. University and Christian Mission, 30, 113-142.
  7. Park, S. I. (2014). The Reestablishment of the Meaning of the Christian Liberal Education. University and Christian Mission, 27, 143-169.
  8. Park, I. W. (2014). Enhancing the interaction between instructor and students in the e-Learning class: a case study. Korean Journal of General Education, 5(2), 321-354.
  9. Park, J. H. & Ryu, K. U. (2014). The Analyses of the Concepts, Contents, Satisfaction and Future Needs for College General Educaiton. Korean Journal of General Education, 8, 43-82.
  10. Park, H. J. (2011). A Suggestion for General Education Curriculum of Christian Colleges. Korea society for christian education & information technology, 28, 55-82.
  11. Park, I. W. (2017). Search for Direction of Liberal Arts Education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(2), 13-51.
  12. Shon, D. H. (2019). The theory of university liberal arts education. Seoul: Philosophy and Real History.
  13. Shon, S. K. (2015). Reconceptualization of Integrated Curriculum for Christian Liberal Art Education in University. Korea society for christian education & information technology, 45, 135-163.
  14. Shon, S. N. (2011). The form and transformation of humanities and liberal arts education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  15. Shin, H. J. (2013). A Study on Undergraduate Liberal Education Curriculum for an Achievement of Significant Learning Outcomes. Korean Journal of General Education, 7, 467-493.
  16. Oh, I. T. (1992). History of Christian education. Seoul: handl.
  17. Yoon, S. M. (2023). A Study on Christian Liberal Arts Course to Overcome Climate Crisis. Theology and Praxis, 83, 377-400. https://doi.org/10.14387/jkspth.2023.83.377
  18. Lee, D. S. (2021). A Plan to Promote Christian Liberal Arts through PBL Classes. Theology and the Gospel, 10, 61-94.
  19. Lee, M. Y. (1992). Korean Christianity and ethnic consciousness. Seoul: Jisiksanup pub.
  20. Lee, S. M. (2018). The Direction of College Liberal Arts Education Demanded by Future Society. Human research, 37, 113-133. https://doi.org/10.21738/JHS.2018.11.37.113
  21. Lee, J. G. (2014). Practical Approach to Integrated Curriculum for Liberal Arts Education in Christian University. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 37, 53-81.
  22. Cho, S. H. (2022). The Features of MZ Generation and the Formation of its Future-Oriented Christian Spirituality. Theology and Praxis, 79, 229-258. https://doi.org/10.14387/jkspth.2022.79.229
  23. Jo, Y. H. (2004). A Study on Liberal Arts Education in the Christian Universities. Korea society for christian education & information technology, 9, 337-359.
  24. Cho, J. C. (2020). The Uncomfortable and Inevitable Conversion of Christianity and Liberal Education. University and Christian Mission, 46, 7-36.
  25. Choi, M. L. (2001). Comparison of liberal arts education in American and Korean universities. Seoul: Yangseowon.
  26. Choi, S. H. (2001). The Curriculum Strategy of Liberal Arts by Christian Universities for Responding to the Challenge of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korea society for christian education & information technology, 67, 199-225.
  27. Gangel, K. O., & Benson, W. S. (1992). Christian education. Translator: Park, J. K. Seoul: CLC. (Original article published in 1983)
  28. Larmer, J. M., John, R. B., & Boss, S. (2017). Setting the standard for project based learning. Translator: Choi, S. K., Jang, B. E. and Kim, B. s. Seoul: Jisikframe. (Original article published in 2015)
  29. Palmer, P. J., & Zajonc, A. (2017). The heart of higher education. Translator: Lee, J. S. Anyang: friendsbook. (Original article published in 2010)
  30. Whitehead, A. N. (2004). The aims of education. Translator: Oh, Y. H. Paju: Kungree. (Original article published in 1929)
  31. Harvard Committee. (1945). General education in a free society: Report of the Harvard committee. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University.
  32. Homes, A. F. (2001). Building the Christian academy. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmands Publishing.
  33. Hutchins, R. M. (1976). The conflict in education in a democratic society. Connecticut: Greenwood Press Inc.
  34. Moore, D. L. (2014). Overcoming Religious Literacy: Expanding the Boundaries of Religious Education. Religious Education, 109(4), 379-389.
  35. Weaver, F. S. (1991). Liberal education: Critical essays on profession, pedagogy, and structure. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.