Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effects of Digital Co-Teaching on Reading Literacy

디지털 협력수업이 독서 리터러시에 미치는 효과 연구

  • 박주현 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 강봉숙 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.07.20
  • Accepted : 2023.07.31
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to confirm the effect of digital co-teaching between teachers online on improving students' reading literacy. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, a pre-test was conducted on first-year high school students, and a post-test was conducted after conducting the co-teaching over two sessions. For statistical analysis, the data of 101 students with no missing values in pre- and post-tests were used. Through the OECD's PISA reading literacy evaluation framework and factor analysis, a reading literacy test tool consisting of expression, comprehension, and information literacy was developed and the degree of change in reading literacy was measured through a self-report with the tool. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the digital co-teaching had a statistically significant positive effect on the expression, comprehension and information literacy of high school students. This study is meaningful in that it shows that digital co-teaching can be applied as a way to improve reading literacy in PISA organized by the OECD.

본 연구의 목적은 온라인으로 진행된 교사 간 디지털 협력수업이 학생들의 독서 리터러시 향상에 어떠한 효과가 있었는지를 확인하는 데 있다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 고등학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로 사전검사를 하였고, 2차시에 걸쳐 교사 간 디지털 협력수업을 실시한 후 사후검사를 하였다. 통계분석을 위해 사전과 사후 검사에서 결측값이 없는 101명의 데이터를 활용하였다. OECD의 PISA 독서 리터러시 평가틀과 요인분석을 통해 표현능력과 이해능력 및 정보활용능력으로 구성된 독서 리터러시 검사 도구를 개발하였으며 자기보고 식으로 독서 리터러시 역량의 변화도를 측정하였다. 분석결과, 디지털 협력수업은 고등학생의 표현능력과 이해능력 및 정보활용능력에 통계적으로 유의미하게 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있음을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 OECD가 주관하는 PISA의 독서 리터러시를 향상시키는 방법으로 디지털 협력수업이 적용될 수 있음을 보여주고 있다는 데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, Mi-ah (2014). A case study of collaborative classes between a teacher librarian and a Chinese language teacher applying problem-based learning. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(2), 65-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.065 
  2. Kang, Bong-suk & Park, Juhyeon (2023). A study on the effects of teacher librarians' media and information literacy classes: focused on the high school credit system. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 179-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.2.179 
  3. Kang, Bong-Suk (2013). A qualitative study on benefits of library assisted instruction recognized by middle and high school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(4), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.169 
  4. Kang, Bong-Suk (2018). A case study on school library educational services to reduce the information literacy gap due to the education gap. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 307-329. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.3.201809.307 
  5. Ki, Minjin & Song, Gi-Ho (2013). A study on the effect of collaborative instruction between a teacher librarian and a Korean language teacher on a middle school student's learning interest and academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(2), 123-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.123 
  6. Korean Publishing Research Institute (2012). 2011 Research Report on Reading Status. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. 
  7. Korean Publishing Research Institute (2020). 2019 Research Report on Reading Status. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. 
  8. Lee, ByeongKi (2010). Study on the restructure of information literacy process based on taxonomy educational objectives. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 107-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.107 
  9. Lee, Duckjoo & Cho, miah (2012). A case study on the high school library-assisted instruction. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(3), 231-251.  https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.3.231
  10. Lee, Eun jeok (2021). Cooperative classes between school teachers and culture and arts professionals: operational situations and implications. Journal of Art Education, 66, 193-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.35657/jae.2021.66..007 
  11. Lee, Eunsang & Kim, Hyeonjin (2020). Development research on teachers' collaborative instructional design model(T-CID) for student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 1057-1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.4.1057 
  12. Lee, Hyoung Bin & Kang, Esther (2015). A study on the effectivity of co-teaching for basic academy achievement in elementary school. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 23(4), 181-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2015.23.4.181 
  13. Lee, Ji-Yeon, Sung, Eunmo, Lee, Jieun, Lim, Kyu-Yon, & Han, Seungyeon (2020). Challenges and tasks facing online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 671-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.671 
  14. Lee, Young-Tae, Lee, Gyeongnam, & Oh, Taek-Keun (2021). Developing models for co-teaching instructional design and basic education guidance. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 593-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET.37.3.593 
  15. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised National Curriculum(#2015-74). Available: https://ncic.re.kr
  16. Ministry of Education (2019). Briefing on measures to improve basic academic support. Available: https://youtu.be/3MnY2ltsqvo 
  17. Park, Daekwon & Kim, Youngsik (2014). Co-teaching of homeroom teacher and sports instructor in elementary school. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(7), 149-165. 
  18. Park, Juhyeon & Ranasinghe, W. M. T. D. (2021). A study on exploring digital information service method through analysis of PISA 2018 reading literacy assessment framework. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 135-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.135 
  19. Park, Juhyeon (2018). A study on the direction of reading and information service through analysis of digital reading and information literacy competencies evaluation items: focusing on PIAAC and PISA. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(3), 61-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.3.061 
  20. Park, Yongnam & Jeong, Do-Sang (2023). Exploring co-teaching aspects of classroom teacher and sport instructor in elementary school. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education, 28(4), 173-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.26844/ksepe.2023.28.4.173 
  21. Yun, Jieun & Kim, Eunhye (2023). Exploration the effective direction of arts and culture education in schools through teacher-artist collaborative classes. Interdisciplinary Research in Arts and Culture, 4(2), 67-80.
  22. Buckley, F. J. (2000). Team Teaching: What, Why and How? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 
  23. Cook, L. & Friedn, M. (1995). Co-Teaching: guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exeptional Children, 28(3), 1-16. 
  24. Eisenberg, M. & Berkowitz, R. (1988). Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 
  25. Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. 
  26. Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-Teaching: an illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380 
  27. IFLA & UNESCO (1999). IFLA/UNESCO School Library Manifesto: The School Library in Teaching and Learning for All. Available: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s11/pubs/manifest.htm 
  28. IFLA (2021). IFLA School Library Manifesto. Available: https://cdn.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/files/assets/school-libraries-resource-centers/pub lications/ifla_school_manifesto_2021.pdf 
  29. OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en 
  30. OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
  31. OECD (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en 
  32. UNESCO (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness and Competencies. Paris: UNESCO.