DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Priority in the Robotaxi Design Elements : Focusing on Application of AHP Methodology

로보택시 설계 요소 간 우선순위 분석 : AHP 방법론 적용을 중심으로

  • Juhye Ha (Dept. of Information UX Track., Univ. of Yonsei) ;
  • Yeonbi Jeung (Dept. of Information UX Track., Univ. of Yonsei) ;
  • Junho Choi (Dept. of Information UX Track., Univ. of Yonsei)
  • 하주혜 (연세대학교 정보대학원 UX트랙 ) ;
  • 정연비 (연세대학교 정보대학원 UX트랙 ) ;
  • 최준호 (연세대학교 정보대학원 UX트랙 )
  • Received : 2023.06.30
  • Accepted : 2023.08.07
  • Published : 2023.08.31

Abstract

research on user-friendly experience design is crucial to reduce resistance and enhance acceptance of robotaxis. This study analyzes the prioritization of design factors in robotaxi systems and provides design guidelines based on user experience. Using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, users' perceived importance of four primary design factors and sixteen 16 sub-design elements were assessed, and comfort and safety were top priorities. The results showed that the artificial intelligence agent was the most critical design factor, followed by driving guidance information, interior design, and exterior design. These findings offer valuable insights for robotaxi professionals, and could assist in informed decision-making and creating user-centered design guidelines.

로보택시에 대한 거부감을 낮추고 수용도를 높이기 위해서는, 사용자 친화적인 경험 디자인 요소를 파악하기 위한 선행 연구가 필요하다. 이 연구의 목표는 로보택시의 다양한 설계 요인 간의 우선순위를 분석하여 사용자 경험에 기반한 설계 가이드라인을 제시하는 것이다. 로보택시의 최상위 가치를 편안함과 안전감으로 설정하고, AHP 기법을 사용하여 4개의 상위 설계 요인과 16개의 하위 디자인 요소에 대한 잠재 탑승 고객들의 중요도 인식 우선순위를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 인공지능 에이전트가 가장 중요한 설계 요인으로 평가되었다. 그다음 주행안내 정보설계, 내부 디자인, 외관 디자인 순으로 중요도가 평가되었다. 이 연구 결과는 로보택시 관련 전문가들에게 수요자들이 기대하는 설계 요인과 디자인 요소의 중요도 우선순위를 제시하여, 합리적 의사 결정을 지원하는 사용자 경험 기반 가이드라인으로 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arazy, O., Nov, O. and Kumar, N.(2015), "Personalityzation: UI personalization, theoretical grounding in HCI and design research", AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 2, pp.43-69. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00065
  2. Chen, H. K. and Yan, D. W.(2019), "Interrelationships between influential factors and behavioral intention with regard to autonomous vehicles", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 13, no. 7, pp.511-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1488021
  3. Culley, K. E. and Madhavan, P.(2013), "A note of caution regarding anthropomorphism in HCI agents", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.577-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.023
  4. Da Silva, M. G.(2002), "Measurements of comfort in vehicles", Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 6, R41.
  5. Dai, J., Li, R., Liu, Z. and Lin, S.(2021), "Impacts of the introduction of autonomous taxi on travel behaviors of the experienced user: Evidence from a one-year paid taxi service in Guangzhou, China", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 130, 103311.
  6. De Visser, E. J., Krueger, F., McKnight, P., Scheid, S., Smith, M., Chalk, S. and Parasuraman, R.(2012), "The world is not enough: Trust in cognitive agents", Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 56, no. 1, pp.263-267.
  7. Eden, G., Nanchen, B., Ramseyer, R. and Evequoz, F.(2017), "Expectation and experience: Passenger acceptance of autonomous public transportation vehicles", Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2017: 16th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, pp.25-29.
  8. Faas, S. M., Mathis, L. A. and Baumann, M.(2020), "External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed?", Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 68, pp.171-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009
  9. Green, B. D.(2010), Applying human characteristics of trust to animated anthropomorphic software agents, State University of New York at Buffalo.
  10. Griesche, S., Nicolay, E., Assmann, D., Dotzauer, M. and Kathner, D.(2016), "Should my car drive as I do? What kind of driving style do drivers prefer for the design of automated driving functions", Braunschweiger Symposium, vol. 10, no. 11, pp.185-204.
  11. Hoff, K. A. and Bashir, M.(2015), "Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust", Human Factors, vol. 57, no. 3, pp.407-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
  12. Hua, T.(2022), How to Establish Robotaxi Trustworthiness Through In-Vehicle Interaction Design, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
  13. Hulse, L. M., Xie, H. and Galea, E. R.(2018), "Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age", Safety Science, vol. 102, pp.1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
  14. Jang, C. H., Song, J. M. and Jang, J. Y.(2018), "Analysis of Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles and Car-sharing on Spatial Configuration in Urban Areas: Focusing on Parking Demand", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, pp.151-169. https://doi.org/10.15793/KSPR.2018.99..009
  15. Jang, H. J. and Byun, S. T.(2007), "Research on development of design concepts, especially interior design, for taxi vehicles", Journal of Basic Design & Art, vol. 8, no. 4, pp.621-630.
  16. Joo, H. H., Kang, C. Y. and Choi, J. H.(2019), "A study on the driver experience according to the information provision method of conversational AI agents in level 3 autonomous driving environment: Focusing on the explainability and visual cues", Journal of Digital Contents Society, vol. 20, no. 8, pp.1577-1584. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.8.1577
  17. Kang, H. T.(2019), A Study on Interaction Design through Lighting in Autonomous Vehicle Exterior Styling: Focused on communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians, Master's Thesis, Kookmin University.
  18. Kim, J. H., Kim, S. C. and Nam, C.(2016), "User resistance to acceptance of In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems", Telecommunications Policy, vol. 40, no. 9, pp.919-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.07.006
  19. Kim, S. W., Choi, J. H. and Kang, H. M.(2021), "A Study of User Experience According to the Information Composition and Display Placement of eHMI at the Pick-up Stage of Autonomous Mobility on Demand Service", Society of Design Convergence, vol. 20, no. 4, pp.79-92. https://doi.org/10.31678/SDC89.6
  20. Kim, S., Chang, J. J. E., Park, H. H., Song, S. U., Cha, C. B., Kim, J. W. and Kang, N.(2020), "Autonomous taxi service design and user experience", International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 36, no. 5, pp.429-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1653556
  21. Kim, Y. J. and Shim, J. S.(2007), "A Comparison of Weight Elicitation Techniques: Focusing on AHP, JA, and SW", Public Policy Review, vol. 21, pp.5-33. https://doi.org/10.17327/ippa.2007.21.1.001
  22. Kobel, S. and Groeppel-Klein, A.(2021), "No laughing matter, or a secret weapon? Exploring the effect of humor in service failure situations", Journal of Business Research, vol. 132, pp.260-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.034
  23. Kwon, J. Y. and Ju, D. Y.(2018), "Interior Design of Fully Autonomous Vehicle for Emotional Experience: Focused on Consumer's Consciousness toward In-Vehicle Activity", Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.17-34. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2018.21.1.17
  24. Lee, S. C.(2020), "A Systematic Review on Design Space of External Human-Machine Interface for Autonomous Vehicle", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, vol. 39, no. 6, pp.549-559. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2020.39.6.549
  25. Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H. and Pollanen, M.(2018), "Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles", Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 59, pp.24-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010
  26. Liu, M., Wu, J., Zhu, C. and Hu, K.(2022), "Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Robo-Taxi Services in China: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Analysis", Journal of Advanced Transportation, Hindawi Limited, vol. 2022, pp.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8461212
  27. Liu, P., Yang, R. and Xu, Z.(2019), "Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions", Risk Analysis, vol. 39, no. 2, pp.326-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13143
  28. Mathies, C., Chiew, T. M. and Kleinaltenkamp, M.(2016), "The antecedents and consequences of humour for service: A review and directions for research", Journal of Service Theory and Practice, vol. 26, no. 2, pp.137-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-09-2014-0187
  29. Meurer, J., Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., Randall, D. and Wulf, V.(2020), "A wizard of oz study on passengers' experiences of a robo-taxi service in real-life settings", ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp.1365-1377.
  30. Niculescu, A., Van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., Li, H. and See, S. L.(2013), "Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy", International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, pp.171-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0171-x
  31. Noh, J. M., Ko, W. R., Kim, J. H., Oh, S. J. and Yun, L. S.(2022), "Development of Functional Scenarios for Automated Vehicle Assessment: Focused on Tollgate and Ramp Sections", The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 21, no. 6, pp.250-265. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2022.21.6.250
  32. Park, K. G. and Jung, C. C.(2017), "A Study on Driver Experience for Autonomous Vehicles in 2030", Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, pp.376-379.
  33. Ramm, S., Giacomin, J., Robertson, D. and Malizia, A.(2014), "A first approach to understanding and measuring naturalness in driver-car interaction", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp.1-10.
  34. Saaty, T. L.(1994), "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process", Interfaces, vol. 24, no. 6, pp.19-43. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.24.6.19
  35. Saeed, T. U., Burris, M. W., Labi, S. and Sinha, K. C.(2020), "An empirical discourse on forecasting the use of autonomous vehicles using consumers' preferences", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 158, p.120130.
  36. Seeger, G. and Bick, M.(2013), "Mega and Consumer Trends-Towards Car-Independent Mobile Applications", International Conference on Mobile Business, vol. 27.
  37. Seo, S. J., Kim, J. H., Lee, J. H. and Yang, B. S.(2022), "Analysis on the Importance Rank of Service Components of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Service by Potential User Groups", The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 21, no. 6, pp.177-193. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2022.21.6.177
  38. Tussyadiah, I. P., Zach, F. J. and Wang, J.(2017), "Attitudes toward autonomous on demand mobility system: The case of self-driving taxi", Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017, Springer International Publishing, pp.755-766.
  39. Woldeamanuel, M. and Nguyen, D.(2018), "Perceived benefits and concerns of autonomous vehicles: An exploratory study of millennials' sentiments of an emerging market", Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 71, pp.44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.006
  40. Yoo, C. M., Pan, Y. H. and Yoo, H. S.(2019), "A Classification of Autonomous Car's Seat Type and an Analysis of Driver's Requirements", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, vol. 38, no. 6, pp.403-418. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2019.38.6.403
  41. Yoo, S., Lee, S., Kim, S., Kim, E., Hwangbo, H. and Kang, N.(2020), A Study on Anxiety about Using Robo-taxis: HMI Design for Anxiety Factor Analysis and Anxiety Relief Based on Field Tests, arXiv preprint arXiv. 09155.
  42. Yoo, Y. J. and Jun, S. J.(2020), "Analysis on the User-Agent Interaction and Design Elements of Anthropomorphized Agent Based on Interpersonal Relationship", Journal of Integrated Design Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp.111-127. https://doi.org/10.21195/JIDR.2020.19.3.007
  43. Yun, E. G. and Park, S. Y.(2022), "A Study on the Development of the Quality of Life Using AHP Analysis", Korean Governance Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp.145-174.
  44. Zhang, J.(2014), A study on Sensitivity elements and Formative art for Automobile Design, Master's Thesis, Jeonju University.
  45. Zhang, M., Gursoy, D., Zhu, Z. and Shi, S.(2021), "Impact of anthropomorphic features of artificially intelligent service robots on consumer acceptance: Moderating role of sense of humor", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 11, pp.3883-3905. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2020-1256