산업융합연구 (Journal of Industrial Convergence)

  • 제21권8호
  • /
  • Pages.1-12
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2635-8875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2672-0124(eISSN)
대한산업경영학회 (DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

블렌디드러닝의 외적 수업형태 및 내적 수업전략이 학업성취도와 학습자 인식에 미치는 영향 탐색

Exploration of the Impact of Blended Learning's External Classroom Formats and Internal Teaching Strategies on Academic Achievement and Learners' Perception

  • 홍예윤 (이화여자대학교) ;
  • 임연욱 (한양사이버대학교 플랫폼교육공학과)
  • Ye-Yoon Hong (Dept. of Mathematics Education, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yeon-Wook Im (Dept. of Platform Educational Technology, Hanyang Cyber University)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.12
  • 심사 : 2023.08.20
  • 발행 : 2023.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 COVID-19 팬데믹으로 인해 대학 수업에서 시행하게 된 블렌디드러닝의 외적 수업형태가 학생들의 학업 성취도에 미친 영향, 그리고 블렌디드러닝의 내적 수업전략이 학습자의 인식에 미친 영향은 어떠한지를 분석하여 온라인수업의 바람직한 방향성을 제시하는 것이다. 본 연구는 2022년 1학기 G대학에서 미적분학I 수업을 수강하는 학생들을 대상으로 하여 실험반 117명과 비교반 707명에 대한 대면수업 및 온라인수업 그리고 교수 방법의 혼합을 통한 블렌디드러닝을 실시하고 학업성취도와 학습자 인식을 조사하였다. 연구결과로는 온라인수업만으로 한 학기를 진행했을 때보다 중간고사 이전에는 온라인수업을 진행하고, 이후에는 대면수업으로 운영하는 블랜디드 수업방식을 수행하였을 때 학업성취도가 하향되는 결과를 얻게 되었다. 미리 준비되지 않은 단순한 외적 수업형태의 블렌디드러닝은 비효과적이었으나 온라인수업으로만 이루어진 수업형태에서 동영상 및 실시간 수업의 혼합 모형은 긍정적인 학습자 인식을 보여주었다. 테크놀로지를 혼합하여 실시한 교수전략 또한 긍정적인 결과로 나타났다.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of blended learning's external classroom formats and internal teaching strategies, which has been implemented in university classes due to COVID-19, on students' academic achievement and learners' perceptions, as well as to provide insights into the desirable direction of online education. The study was conducted during the 1st semester of 2022 at G University, targeting students taking Calculus I. The experimental group consisted of 117 students, while the control group consisted of 707 students. Blended learning, involving a combination of face-to-face classes, online classes, and mixed teaching methods, was implemented, and academic achievement and learner perceptions were assessed. The research findings indicate that compared to solely online classes, adopting a blended learning approach with online classes before the midterm and face-to-face classes afterwards resulted in a decline in academic achievement. The unprepared and simplistic external format of blended learning was found to be ineffective, however, a blended learning model consisting solely of online classes, incorporating a mix of asynchronous and synchronous instruction, demonstrated positive learner perceptions. Additionally, utilizing technology in the teaching strategies yielded positive outcome.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Y. Y. Hong & Y. W. Im. (2019). A study on the educational methodology for improving preservice teachers' competence of designing STEAM classes. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.071
  3. J. J. Woo, B. N. Kim & O. H. Lee. (2009). A Study on the blended learning as an alternative of face-to-face learning in university. The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 7(2), 219-225.
  4. J. Y. Kim. (2018). Learning effect analysis of blended learning in SW coding education. The Society of Convergence Knowledge Transactions, 6(1), 1-7.
  5. Y. W. Kee & H. J. Roh. (2005). A comparison study on the effects of blended learning course and on-line course in a university class. The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD, 1(1), 63-79.
  6. K. H. Kim. (2020). Study on the effects and limitations of blended learning-based college lectures in online courses. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(5), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2020.14.5.239
  7. M. Y. Kim, K. S. Ahn & W. S. Choi. (2005). The comparison of the learning achievement and learning satisfaction between in the blended class and online class and offline class. Journal of the Korean Institute of industrial educators, 30(1), 106-119.
  8. J. K. Lee. (2015). Blended learning preuniversity program performance report. Ansan: Center for Teaching & Learning, Hanyang University.
  9. H. D. Kang. (2021). University students' perceptions of the effects of online lecture types and its media types. English Teaching, 76(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.76.s1.202109.59
  10. W. K. Kang & I. S. Kim. (2020). A comparison of blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning for some dental technology students in practice teaching. Journal of Technologic Dentistry, 42(3), 248-253.
  11. W. S. Kim. (2015). Analysis of student satisfaction survey on Computer Practice subject by applying blended learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(3), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.373
  12. H. K. Park. (2023). Educational effect and operation of blended learning for engineering education. Journal of practical engineering education), 15(1), 39-44.
  13. H. J. Park & H. J. Shin. (2022). Effects of blended learning on learner's satisfaction, self-directed learning ability and self-efficacy. Journal of speech & hearing disorders, 31(3), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2022.31.3.083
  14. M. K. Lee. (2015). The effects of TOEIC classes using blended learning for university students. English Language & Literature Teaching, 21(4), 257-281.
  15. I. Y. Shin. (2021). Performance and perceptions of Korean university students on blended e-learning and asynchronous learning. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 12(6), 3067-3080. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.6.216
  16. M. O. Suh. (2021). The study of graduate students perceptions in the graduate school of education that related the case of online class in the corona 19 pandemic. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(2), 561-582.
  17. Y. Cha & H. Kim. (2011). Implementation of instructional methods and learners' views in online/offline Business English classes. Journal of Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning. 14(3), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2011.14.3.11
  18. S. H. Cheong. (2020). Learner-centered blended learning types in a finance major-affiliated English class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(21), 1337-1363. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.21.1337
  19. P. Sharma & B. Barrett. (2007). Blended Learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2008). The role of technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Retrieved 10/4/2012, from http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=14233.
  21. K. W. Kim. (2023). Suggestions for convergence and complex teaching and learning methods and curriculum reorganization through historical development of the limit concept of Calculus in field education. Journal of Field-based Lesson Studies, 4(1), 173-196. https://doi.org/10.22768/JFLS.2023.4.1.173
  22. Y. Y. Hong. (2017). A study visual understanding by using smartphones in university Calculus classes, Journal of the society of e-learning, Vol(2).
  23. H. Freudenthal. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305618
  24. A. J. Wayne & P. Youngs. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073001089
  25. K. S. Lee. (2022). Development and effectiveness analysis of differential and integral teaching-learning programs in high school Mathematics II subjects using GeoGebra. Master's dissertation. Kyungbuk University.
  26. B. H. Kim, M. A. Jeong & E. J. Kim. (2021). Satisfaction and effectiveness of online classes of college students in COVID-19. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(5), 767-780.
  27. L. Trouche & P. Drijvers(2010) "Handheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future", ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0269-2
  28. K. M. Kim. (2013). Application of technology in mathematics education. The Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Studies, 6(2), 25-54.
  29. I. Y. Choi, H. K. Kim, M. H. Song & I. W. Chung. (2021). Time and subject of technology usage in mathematics classes: focusing on PISA 2018. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(7), 483-497.
  30. Y. Y. Hong & Y. W. Im(2021). A study on the efficiency of online classes-focused on various teaching methods in college-. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(10), 63-73.
  31. R. R. Skemp, (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding, Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
  32. Y. J. Park, K. H. Lee & H. S. Lee. (2022). A comparative study on academic achievement and class satisfaction of College General Mathematics according to face-to-face classes and remote classes. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 22(1), 324-336.
  33. H. D. Kang. (2021). University students' perceptions of the effects of online lecture types and its media types. English Teaching, 76(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.76.s1.202109.59
  34. Chee Kyong Seong. (2011). Effect of the students' e-learning participation and access frequency and access times on learning achievement in blended-learning environment. Journal of Communication Design, 35, 90-98.
  35. S. A. Song. (2017). Strategic flipped learning in-class design. Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(3), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.03.51