DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Wind Characteristics around Nuclear Power Plants Based on the Joint Distribution of the Wind Direction and Wind Speed

  • Yunjong Lee (Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2023.08.21
  • Accepted : 2023.09.21
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Given that toxic substances are diffused by the various movements of the atmosphere, it is very important to evaluate the risks associated with this phenomenon. When analyzing the behavioral characteristics of these atmospheric diffusion models, the main input data are the wind speed and wind direction among the meteorological data. In particular, it is known that a certain wind direction occurs in summer and winter in Korea under the influence of westerlies and monsoons. In this study, synoptic meteorological observation data provided by the Korea Meteorological Administration were analyzed from January 1, 2012 to the end of August of 2022 to understand the regional wind characteristics of nuclear power plants and surrounding areas. The selected target areas consisted of 16 weather stations around the Hanbit, Kori, Wolsong, Hanul, and Saeul nuclear power plants that are currently in operation. The analysis was based on the temperature, wind direction, and wind speed data at those locations. Average, maximum, minimum, median, and mode values were analyzed using long-term annual temperature, wind speed, and wind direction data. Correlation coefficient values were also analyzed to determine the linear relationships among the temperature, wind direction, and wind speed. Among the 16 districts, Uljin had the highest wind speed. The median wind speed values for each region were lower than the average wind speed values. For regions where the average wind speed exceeds the median wind speed, Yeongju, Gochang, Gyeongju, Yeonggwang, and Gimhae were calculated as 0.69 m s-1, 0.54m s-1, 0.45m s-1, 0.4m s-1, and 0.36m s-1, respectively. The average temperature in the 16 regions was 13.52 degrees Celsius; the median temperature was 14.31 degrees and the mode temperature was 20.69 degrees. The average regional temperature standard deviation was calculated and found to be 9.83 degrees. The maximum summer temperatures were 39.7, 39.5, and 39.3 in Yeongdeok, Pohang, and Yeongcheon, respectively. The wind directions and speeds in the 16 regions were plotted as a wind rose graph, and the characteristics of the wind direction and speed of each region were investigated. It was found that there is a dominant wind direction correlated with the topographical characteristics in each region. However, the linear relationship between the wind speed and direction by region varied from 0.53 to 0.07. Through this study, by evaluating meteorological observation data on a long-term synoptic scale of ten years, regional characteristics were found.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper is research conducted with the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) with funding from the government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (NRF2020M2D2A2062571).

References

  1. Disaster Recovery, Busan City Hall Homepage, 2022. 9. 10. https://www.busan.go.kr/depart/disasterhistory0102
  2. Jeong JH and Cho LN. 2010, Trend of the Westerlies over the Korean Peninsula. J. Clim. Res. 5(1):68-77.
  3. Kang B, Jung C, Park Y-S and Kong G-Y. 2021. Minimum Wind Speed of Dragging Anchor for Ships in Jinhae Bay Typhoon Refuge. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 27(4):474-482. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2021.27.4.474
  4. Seol D. 2013. Seasonal wind changes on the west coast of Korea. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Navigation and Maritime Affairs 2013 Fall Conference Proceedings 2013.09. pp. 19-20.
  5. Government e-learning platforms. 2022. 8. 12. Korea Meteorological Administration. http://kma.nhi.go.kr/
  6. Hongwei H, Dan F, Rentai Y and Xignajun X. 2011. Comparison of atmospheric dispersion factor in complex terrain. Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1:452-455. https://doi.org/10.15669/pnst.1.452
  7. Moon JH. 2020. Suggestions to Improve the Effectiveness of National Radiological Emergency Response System. JNFCWT 18(2):195-206. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2020.18.2.195
  8. EPRI_1015105: Risk-Informed Evaluation of Protective Action Strategies for Nuclear Plant Off-Site Emergency Planning. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA and NEI, Washingon, D.C.: 2007. 1015105
  9. Collins HE and Grimes BK. 1978. Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Task Force on Emergency Planning.
  10. Open Nuclear Operations Information, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Homepage, July 12, 2022. https://npp.khnp.co.kr/index.khnp
  11. Data of Automated Synoptic Observing System, Sep. 3, 2022. https://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/selectAsosRltmList.do?pgmNo=36
  12. Scale of atmospheric circulation, Korea Meteorological Administration, Sep. 1, 2022 18:34. https://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?isHttpsRedirect=true&blogId=kma_131&logNo=221276236381
  13. Wind, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2022.8. 12. 14:57, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind