Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제87권4호
  • /
  • Pages.347-361
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between the Egyptian and international codes based on seismic response of mid- to high-rise moment resisting framed buildings

  • Ahmed Ibrahim (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology) ;
  • Ibrahim El-Araby (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology) ;
  • Ahmed I. Saleh (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology) ;
  • Mohammed Shaaban (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.27
  • 심사 : 2023.07.17
  • 발행 : 2023.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This research aims to assess the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) residential buildings when moment-resisting frames (MRFs) are used as the lateral resisting system. This investigation was conducted using MIDAS Gen v.19.0. Buildings with various plan footprints (Square, Rectangular, Circular, Triangular, and Plus-Shaped), and different heights (15 m, 30 m, 45 m, and 60 m) are investigated. The defined load cases, the equivalent static lateral load pattern, and the response spectrum function were defined as stated by the American Standard (ASCE 7-16), the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC97), the Egyptian Code for Loads (ECP-201), and the European Standard (EC8). Extensive comparisons of the results obtained by the different codes (including the story displacement, the story drift, and the base shear) were undertaken; to assess the response of moment-resisting multi-story framed buildings under lateral loads. The results revealed that, for all study cases under consideration, both ECP-201 and EC8 gave smaller base shear, displacement, and drift by one third to one fourth, around one fourth, around one fifth, respectively for both the ELF and RSA methods if compared to ASCE 7-16 and UBC97.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aliakbari, F., Garivani, S. and Shahmari, A. (2020), "Determination of torsional irregularity in response spectrum analysis of building structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 74(5), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.5.699.
  2. ASCE7-16 (2017), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineering.
  3. Bilgin, H., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Isik, E., Ozmen, H.B. and Harirchian, E. (2022), "A comparative study on the seismic provisions of different codes for RC buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 83(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.83.2.195.
  4. Dhanvijay, V., Telang, D. and Nair, V. (2015), "Comparative study of different codes in seismic assessment", Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 2(4), 1371-81.
  5. ECP Committee-203-2020 (2020), The Egyptian Code for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures, Housing and Building Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
  6. ECP-201 (2012), Egyptian Code for Calculating Loads and Forces in Structural Work and Masonry, Housing and Building Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
  7. El-Kholy, A.M., Sayed, H. and Shaheen, A.A. (2018), "Comparison of Egyptian Code 2012 with Eurocode 8-2013, IBC 2015 and UBC 1997 for seismic analysis of residential shear-walls RC buildings in Egypt", Ain Shams Eng. J., 9(4), 3425-3436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.07.004.
  8. Eurocode8 (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, British Standard.
  9. Hassan, W., Anwar, N., Norachan, P. and Majam, F. (2018), "The seismic performance evaluation of RC high-rise buildings designed to various building codes", IABSE Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 427-434.
  10. Huang, H., Li, M., Yuan, Y. and Bai, H. (2022), "Theoretical analysis on the lateral drift of precast concrete frame with replaceable artificial controllable plastic hinges", J. Build. Eng., 62, 105386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105386.
  11. Hussein, M.M. (2021), "Comparison of egyptian and international seismic codes for different building heights", Xi'an Univ. Arch. Technol., XIII(3), 91-107.
  12. Paz, M. and Leigh, W. (2004), Structural-Dynamics-Mario Paz5Th Edition.Pdf.
  13. Qiao, S., Liang, H., Tang, M., Wang, W. and Hu, H. (2019), "Seismic performance analysis of steel-brace RC frame using topology optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 71(4), 417-432. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.71.4.417.
  14. Rahman, M.M., Jadhav, S.M. and Shahrooz, B.M. (2018), "Seismic performance of reinforce concrete buildings designed according to codes in Bangladesh, India and U.S", Eng. Struct., 160, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.010.
  15. Resatoglu, R. and Hamed, M. (2019), "Comparative study of different seismic codes for reinforced concrete buildings in northern Cyprus using static and dynamic methods", J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 14(3), 1314-1329.
  16. Shaaban, M., Abouelsaad, M.N., El Bagalaty, S. and El Madawy, M.E. (2022), "Seismic analysis of RC high-rise buildings rested on cellular raft", Build., 12(11), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111924.
  17. Tian, L.M., Li, M.H., Li, L., Li, D.Y. and Bai, C. (2023), "Novel joint for improving the collapse resistance of steel frame structures in column-loss scenarios", Thin Wall. Struct., 182, 110219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110219.
  18. UBC97 (1997), Building Standards, 1997 Uniform Building Code.
  19. Wagh, A., Narkhede, T. and Salunke, P. (2018), "Codal comparison of seismic analysis of a high- rise structure", Int. J. Sci. Technol. Eng., 5(4), 39-45.
  20. Waris, M.B., Al-Jabri, K. and El-Hussain, I. (2022), "Comparison of oman seismic code with international counterparts based on regional seismic hazard", J. Eng. Res., 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53540/tjer.vol19iss1pp1-12.