DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tissue integration patterns of non-crosslinked and crosslinked collagen membranes: an experimental in vivo study

  • Xiang Jin (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jin-Young Park (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung-Seok Lee (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Ui-Won Jung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Seong-Ho Choi (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jae-Kook Cha (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.15
  • 심사 : 2022.10.12
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30

초록

Purpose: Non-crosslinked and crosslinked collagen membranes are known to exhibit distinct degradation characteristics, resulting in contrasting orientations of the adjacent tissues and different biological processes. The aim of this study was to conduct a histomorphometric assessment of non-crosslinked and crosslinked collagen membranes regarding neovascularization, tissue integration, tissue encapsulation, and biodegradation. Methods: Guided bone regeneration was performed using either a non-crosslinked (BG) or a crosslinked collagen membrane (CM) in 15 beagle dogs, which were euthanized at 4, 8, and 16 weeks (n=5 each) for histomorphometric analysis. The samples were assessed regarding neovascularization, tissue integration, encapsulation, the remaining membrane area, and pseudoperiosteum formation. The BG and CM groups were compared at different time periods using nonparametric statistical methods. Results: The remaining membrane area of CM was significantly greater than that of BG at 16 weeks; however, there were no significant differences at 4 and 8 weeks. Conversely, the neovascularization score for CM was significantly less than that for BG at 16 weeks. BG exhibited significantly greater tissue integration and encapsulation scores than CM at all time periods, apart from encapsulation at 16 weeks. Pseudoperiosteum formation was observed in the BG group at 16 weeks. Conclusions: Although BG membranes were more rapidly biodegraded than CM membranes, they were gradually replaced by connective tissue with complete integration and maturation of the surrounding tissues to form dense periosteum-like connective tissue. Further studies need to be performed to validate the barrier effect of the pseudoperiosteum.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korean government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: KMDF_PR_20200901_0240), and also by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI20C2114).

참고문헌

  1. Sanz-Sanchez I, Ortiz-Vigon A, Sanz-Martin I, Figuero E, Sanz M. Effectiveness of lateral bone augmentation on the alveolar crest dimension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94 Suppl:128S-42S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515594780
  2. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol 2001;72:215-29. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215
  3. Gough JE, Scotchford CA, Downes S. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde crosslinked collagen/poly(vinyl alcohol) films is by the mechanism of apoptosis. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:121-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10145
  4. Ahn JJ, Kim HJ, Bae EB, Cho WT, Choi Y, Hwang SH, et al. Evaluation of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in beagle dogs. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:E4599.
  5. Park JY, Jung IH, Kim YK, Lim HC, Lee JS, Jung UW, et al. Guided bone regeneration using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked type-I collagen membrane with biphasic calcium phosphate at rabbit calvarial defects. Biomater Res 2015;19:15.
  6. Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Barrier membranes: more than the barrier effect? J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:103-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13068
  7. Park JY, Song YW, Ko KA, Strauss FJ, Thoma DS, Lee JS. Effect of collagen membrane fixation on ridge volume stability and new bone formation following guided bone regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2022;49:684-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13665
  8. Urban IA, Montero E, Monje A, Sanz-Sanchez I. Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:319-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13061
  9. Jimenez Garcia J, Berghezan S, Carames JM, Dard MM, Marques DN. Effect of cross-linked vs non-cross-linked collagen membranes on bone: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res 2017;52:955-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12470
  10. Naenni N, Lim HC, Strauss FJ, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS. Local tissue effects of various barrier membranes in a rat subcutaneous model. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2020;50:327-39. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2000380019
  11. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:369-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x
  12. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J. Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:403-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01225.x
  13. Cha JK, Pla R, Vignoletti F, Jung UW, Sanz-Esporrin J, Sanz M. Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic peri-implant dehiscence defects: An experimental in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32:569-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13726
  14. Omar O, Dahlin A, Gasser A, Dahlin C. Tissue dynamics and regenerative outcome in two resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: a preclinical molecular and histological study in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:7-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13032
  15. Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hammerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:244-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080311.x
  16. Cucchi A, Sartori M, Aldini NN, Vignudelli E, Corinaldesi G. A proposal of pseudo-periosteum classification after GBR by means of titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membranes or titanium meshes plus cross-linked collagen membranes. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2019;39:e157-65. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3598
  17. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wustefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:402-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01486.x
  18. Thoma DS, Villar CC, Cochran DL, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Tissue integration of collagen-based matrices: an experimental study in mice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1333-9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02356.x
  19. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term bio-degradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x
  20. Lee JT, Cha JK, Kim S, Jung UW, Thoma DS, Jung RE. Lateral onlay grafting using different combinations of soft-type synthetic block grafts and resorbable collagen membranes: an experimental in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;31:303-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13566
  21. Cha JK, Sanz M, Jung UW. Human autopsy study of peri-implant dehiscence defects with guided bone regeneration: a case report. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2019;39:517-24. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3329