Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Quality and Color Properties according to the Gas Composition (Modified Atmosphere Packaging) of Pork Sous-Vide Ham Preserved in Natural Brine

  • Sol-Hee Lee (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Hack-Youn Kim (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2023.03.09
  • Accepted : 2023.05.08
  • Published : 2023.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether seawater has positive effects on appearance characteristics, such as CIE a*, and to determine the gas composition concentration that is suitable for maintaining it. Pork hind meat was cured with four types of curing agent for 5 d at 4℃. The different curing agents comprised the control salt, control nitrite pickling salt (CN), treatment brine, and treatment bittern (BT). The cured hams were cooked at 65℃ for 4 h and packaged at O2:N2 gas ratios of 7:3, 8:2, and 9:1 for 3 wk. The physicochemical properties were assessed immediately after heating the sample, and the color properties were measured after a 3 wk storage period. Based on the correlation results of the physicochemical properties, BT had a higher curing and cooking yield than the other treatments, owing to its high salinity. Results of color properties for BT (7:3) and CN (8:2) showed similar color CIE L*, CIE a* chroma, and hue angle values. Therefore, BT can be said to be a sous-vide curing agent suitable for preserving the color of ham, and a high nitrogen concentration of 30% helps to maintain the appearance of seawater sous-vide ham.

Keywords

Introduction

Sous-vide is a method of heating vacuum-packed meat at a low temperature for a long time. Under sous-vide heating conditions (60℃–65℃), protein-protein interactions and gelatin are minimally transformed in meat; therefore, water retention is improved, enhancing meat tenderness (Tornberg, 2005). In addition, because the meat is heated for a long time, the quality of the outer and inner parts remains constant (García-Linares et al., 2004). Pork sous-vide ham was prepared by curing trimmed pork via immersion in a curing solution and applying low-temperature heat for a long time. As the curing solution penetrates the meat, the trace components in the solution interact with the meat and change its physicochemical state (Yim et al., 2020).

Visual appearances (i.e., color, fat content, shape) are the most important factor that affects consumer food choices. Banović et al. (2009) reported that the intrinsic construct indicates to be reflected better by the color of the meat than by cut and fat. Meat product manufactured with sodium nitrite has a red color, usually a higher consumer preference (Fenger et al., 2015). Myoglobin in meat is converted to metmyoglobin when it comes in contact with oxygen, in this phenomenon, the meat turns brown and loses its original color (red color). Because color is a key deciding factor for consumers when choosing food, preserving the product color throughout its shelf life is important (Kausar et al., 2019; Tomasevic et al., 2021).

In meat products, it has little effect on the pigment denaturation of myoglabin, but low-temperature cooking like a sousvide can incompletely denature myoglobin and cause a color change (Seyfert et al., 2004). Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is used to maintain the appearance, texture, and flavor of meat products by controlling the microflora through a gas composition (James, 2000; McMillin, 2008). Oxygen (O2) combines with myoglobin to form oxymyoglobin to express bright red color (Brody, 2002), or carbon dioxide (CO2) inhibits the growth of microorganisms to prevent color change due to the rancidity of proteins and fats (Farber et al., 2003) in MAP. According to Arvanitoyannis and Stratakos (2012) report, the CIE a* decreased when the oxygen concentration was low, and the TVBN value increased when the CO2 concentration increased to 60% or more. Therefore, it is important to find an appropriate concentration ratio that can increase and maintain CIE a*.

After the bay salt is extracted, most of the remaining seawater is discarded (Voutchkov, 2011). Seawater has a high mineral content and a high potential for use as a food additive (Cipollina et al., 2012). In Korea, processed seawater is sometimes used instead of brine when making tofu and pickled vegetables and is also used to kill unwanted weeds (using microalgae). In addition, in a previous study, when seawater was added to sausages, it could increase CIE a*, similar to nitrite pickling salt (NPS; Lee and Kim, 2020). Therefore, in this study, when MAP with different O2:N2 contents was grafted onto seawater (brine and bitter) as curing agents, 1) whether seawater could fix the meat color even after 3 wk, and 2) the most appropriate concentration to maintain the meat color was analyzed.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of sous-vide ham using various curing agents

To prepare sous-vide ham, 24 h post-mortem pork hind legs were purchased from a local market (Yesan, Korea). Gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and gluteus minimus were used for the hind limbs, and excess fat and connective tissue were removed. For the cheeks, six lumps were used for each treatment group, for a total of 24 lumps. The four curing agents were classified as follows: control with NaCl (CS), control with NPS (CN), treatment with brine (BR), and treatment with bittern (BT). NPS were prepared by adding 0.006% nitrite to Hanju Salt (Ulsan, Korea). Brine (composition: 5.89% sodium, 2.79% magnesium, 0.80% potassium, 0.03% calcium, etc.) and bittern (composition: 2.80% sodium, 17.90% magnesium chloride, 1.40% potassium, zinc, etc.) were purchased from Yeorumul (Incheon, Korea). The curing agents were prepared by adding 5% salt, 2% sugar, 1% pepper, and 1% spices (fennel 20%, mustard seed 20%, mustard 15%, coriander 15%, black pepper 15%, cloves 10%, bay leaves 4%, red pepper 1%). The 1,000±200 g and the same amount of curing agent were packed in a polyethylene bag to remove as much as possible of the O2. Curing was performed in a refrigerator at 4℃ for 5 d. On day 5, the samples were removed from the curing and rinsed. The rinsed samples were vacuum-packed and heated in a water bath at 65℃ for 4 h. After heating, the samples were incubated at room temperature for approximately 30 min to remove moisture from the surface.

The cooled sous-vide ham was sliced thinly to aid complete gas absorption and used as the sample. The ham was sliced to a thickness of 2 mm using a food slicer (TI220, Maica, Orlando, FL, USA), and the samples were placed on a plastic tray (QB series, Hypervac, Suwon, Korea) without overlapping. Subsequently, MAP (MAP-H1, Hypervac) was applied using three gas compositions with different O2:N2 ratios of 9:1, 8:2, and 7:3. Samples placed in each gas composition were stored at 4℃ for 3 wk and used for the experiments. The 3 wk storage period was determined according to a previous study (DeWitt and Oliveira, 2016).

Physicochemical properties (curing yield, cooking yield, pH, and salinity) were investigated on the same day after heating and cooling to determine whether the curing agent affected the final product. The appearance properties (CIE L*, CIE a*, CIE b*, chroma, hue angle, moisture content, nitrosoheme content, and nitrite residue) of sous-vide ham after 3 wk were analyzed by varying the gas composition ratio.

Curing yield

The curing yield was measured to compare the weight of the cured meat with that of raw meat. The curing agent was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to raw meat for 5 d. The sample was weighed, and the curing yield was calculated using the following formula:

Curing yield (%) = (Meat weight after curing – Raw meat weight) / Raw meat weight × 100       (1)

Cooking yield

The cooking yield was measured to determine the degree of loss when the cured meat was sous-vide heated, and calculated by measuring the meat weight before and after sous-vide heating at 65℃ for 4 h and cooling for 30 min to remove excess moisture. The formula is as follows:

Cooking yield (%) = (Meat weight after cooking – Meat weight after curing) / Meat weight after curing × 100       (2)

pH and salinity

The sous-vide ham was grounded to have the same balance of fat and protein and subsequently used in the pH and salinity tests. After mixing the samples in distilled water at a 1:4 ratio, homogenization was performed using a homogenizer (HMZ-20DN, Poonglim Tech, Seongnam, Korea; 5,654×g). The pH and salinity of the homogenized samples were measured using a pH meter (Model S220, Mettler-Toledo, Schwarzenbach, Switzerland) and a Scionix ssm-1000 (Sxionix SSM, Deagu, Korea).

Color

Color was measured using a colorimeter (CR-10, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) placed at the center of the ham immediately after removing the wrapping paper from the samples stored for 3 wk in three different gas compositions. After CIE L*, CIE a*, CIE b*, and chroma were measured, the hue angle was calculated using the following formula:

Hue angle = tan–1 (b* / a*)       (3)

Moisture content

Moisture content was measured using a food scanner (DA 6200, PerkinElmer, Daejeon, Korea) after placing a sample of approximately 150 g on a scanner plate.

Nitrosoheme content

The nitrosoheme content was measured using the method described by Kim et al. (2015). Nitrosoheme was extracted by mixing sous-vide ham stored for 3 wk with an acetone/water solution (40:6, v/v) at a ratio of 1:4. The amount of nitrosoheme produced (ppm) was measured at an absorbance of 540 nm using hematin as a standard.

Nitrite residue content

Nitrite residue content was determined according to the method described by Lee and Kim (2020). After homogenizing 10 g of sous-vide ham in 50 mL of distilled water (Ultra Turex, HMZ-20DN), 10 mL of 0.5 M NaOH and 10 mL of 12% zinc sulfate were added, and the mixture was shaken at 80℃. After cooling the sample sufficiently, 20 mL of ammonium acetate was added and the total volume was increased to 200 mL. Next, 1 mL each of sulfanilamide and 1 mL of naphthylethylenediamine were added to 20 mL of the filtered solution, and the final volume was increased to 25 mL using distilled water. A standard curve was measured using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax iD3, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) at 540 nm using nitrite powder (purity: 100%), and the residual amount of nitrite was calculated.

Statistical analysis

The physicochemical properties were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and correlation analysis. Traits were evaluated based on treatment types (CS, CN, BR, and BT) as fixed effects. The relationships between the treatment type, gas composition (O2:N2 at ratios of 7:3, 8:2, and 9:1), and color properties were analyzed using two general linear models and correlation analysis. The color traits included the treatment type and gas composition as fixed effects, including their interaction effects. Values are expressed as means±SD, and significant differences between mean values were determined by Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05).

Results and Discussion

Physicochemical properties and correlation

The quality characteristics of CS, CN, BR, and BT sous-vide pork ham are shown in Table 1. The pH values of BR and BT which used seawater as the curing agent were significantly lower than in the CN and CS which used salt as the curing agent (p<0.05). The pH of the brine and bittern were high for at 8.4 and 8.6, respectively; however, this study result showed contradictory results. Numerous mineral salts and components (e.g., Na+, Mg2+, K+, Ca2+ etc.) exist in seawater; therefore, it is expected that the minerals penetrate into the meat and have a chemical action while going through the curing and heating process. These results indicate that further research is needed on the effect of seawater minerals on meat protein and fat.

Table 1. Physicochemical properties of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents​​​​​​​

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_t0001.png 이미지

All values are mean±SD.

a–c Means in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

CN, control nitrite-pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern.

BT showed significantly higher salinity than CN (p<0.05). BR had higher salinity than CN, although the difference was not significant. Seawater, which is a balanced mixture that dissolves readily, penetrates meat better than an unbalanced mixture of salt and water. In addition, Majou and Christieans (2018) reported that the lower the pH, the easier the molecules dissociate into protons and anions. Therefore, it is expected that BR and BT, which have a lower pH and are cured with a balanced mixture agent, have a higher salinity. This was consistent with the results of Ruusunen and Puolanne (2005), who concluded that the lower the pH of the meat, the higher the diffusion rate of water molecules and the exchange between the liquid clogged in the pores of the meat and the external liquid. The curing yield was the weight measured after drying the surface moisture by hanging after curing and was used to check the curing performance.

Regarding the curing yield, BT showed a significantly higher value than those of CS and BR (p<0.05), which is possibly due to the high salinity of BT, leading to more even salting of the inside of the meat compared to the other treatments. In addition, curing improves the water retention capacity of muscle tissues because muscle fibers are expanded and salt-soluble proteins are extracted from the meat (Jiang et al., 2019). Accordingly, the cooking yield was also significantly higher in BT than those in the other treatments (p<0.05), which may be because moisture leads to the formation of salt-soluble proteins in meat and salting agents, thereby increasing binding strength. Because a high cooking yield is known to have a positive effect on overall acceptability, it is considered a potential curing agent (Mwove et al., 2018).

The results of the correlation analysis of the physicochemical properties are presented in Table 2. pH showed a significant correlation with salinity, curing and cooking yield (p<0.05). At this same time, salinity and curing yield showed a significantly high correlation (p<0.001). It can be seen that the lower the pH, the higher the salinity. In this study, it was hypothesized that an increase in sodium (Na+) would affect the pH value. Salinity seems to have a significant correlation with curing yield (p<0.001) and curing yield with cooking yield (p<0.001). The addition of salts (N+ and Cl– ) to meat increases the ionic strength of meat protein ions, creating space for water binding (Feiner, 2006). The result of the correlation analysis indicated that salinity may be the main variable for sous-vide physicochemical properties. Therefore, it is important that high salinity equalizes the salt content balance of internal and external to enhance processing characteristics (Pinna et al., 2020).

Table 2. Correlation of physicochemical properties of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents​​​​​​​

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_t0002.png 이미지

Values are correlation coefficients for n=20.

* p<0.05; *** p<0.001.

SA, salinity; CU, curing yield; CO, cooking yield.

We believe that the natural curing agent used in this study can have a more positive effect on the processing characteristics of meat than that of salt and brine because it can improve the cooking yield.

Color properties

Regarding color CIE L*, the CN (8:2), CN (9:1), BR (9:1), and BT (9:1) treatments showed higher values than those of the other treatments (Fig. 1). In addition, the CN (8:2) treatment showed significantly higher values than those of the CN (7:3), CS (7:3), CS (8:2), BR (8:2), and BT (8:2) treatments (p<0.05). Moreover, the gas composition at a 9:1 ratio, which contained the lowest amount of nitrogen, showed a significantly higher value than the gas compositions at 8:2 and 7:3 ratios (p<0.05). Overall, CN treatment with a 9:1 gas composition exhibited high CIE L*. This result indicates that the iron atom (Fe2+) in myoglobin was converted to oxy-myoglobin in the presence of O2 in the packaging. Lu et al. (2020) reported that relatively low oxygen levels can enhance the formation of metmyoglobin because it causes partial conversion in meat. Orkusz et al. (2013) also reported that higher concentrations of O2 were correlated with higher CIE L*, which is similar to the results of the present study.

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Color properties (CIE L*) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–d Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

CN (7:3) showed a significantly higher CIE a* than that of the other treatments (p<0.05), followed by BT (7:3). BT (7:3), CN (8:2), CN (9:1), and BT (8:2) showed similar levels, suggesting the possibility of a gas composition in which the BTcuring agent may have a CIE a* similar to that of the treatment group in which NPS was added (Fig. 2). Efforts are being made to replace synthetic color preservatives and preserve the natural CIE a* of meat (Flores and Toldrá, 2021). Between the gas composition treatment groups, more nitrogen (gas composition at a 7:3 ratio) resulted in significantly higher CIE a* than those in more oxygen (gas composition at 8:2 and 9:1 ratios; p<0.05). According to Narasimha Rao and Sachindra (2002), the formation of nitroso-myoglobin in cured meat products increases when the amount of oxygen is limited, this is because high oxygen can brown the product and reduce its CIE L*, reducing CIE a*. Therefore, a lower oxygen content (not too high) helps maintain the pink color.

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Color properties (CIE a*) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–e Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

CN (8:2) had the highest CIE b* and CN (7:3) had the lowest value. The 7:3 gas composition, which contained a large amount of nitrogen, showed a significantly lower CIE b* than the other treatment groups, which seemed to decrease as the CIE a* increased (Fig. 3). Wang et al. (2021) reported that meat CIE b* increased, and CIE a* and CIE L* decreased due to microbial spoilage, myoglobin autoxidation, and lipid oxidation during the retail period. In the present study, CIE a* decreased and CIE b* increased with an increase in the storage period (data not shown). The color was brighter in the gas composition 8:2 group than in the gas composition 7:3 group (p<0.05). CN (8:2), BT (7:3 and 8:2), and BR (8:2 and 9:1) showed similar chroma values (Fig. 4). According to Tapp et al. (2011), chroma is expressed as color saturation or vividness; the higher the value, the clearer the color. Because CIE b* and chroma showed similar tendencies, saturation seemed to be more affected by CIE b* than by CIE a*.

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Color properties (CIE b*) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–c Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Color properties (chroma) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–c Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).

The hue angle of the gas composition 7:3 group was significantly lower than that of the 8:2 and 9:1 gas composition groups (p<0.05). The CS and BR groups showed significantly higher values than the other treatment groups for all gas compositions [p<0.05, excluding BT (9:1)]. BT (7:3) showed a value similar to that of CN (8:2), implying that sous-vide ham packed at 7:3 and 8:2 gas compositions with bittern and NPS as curing agents, respectively, had the same color (Fig. 5). This result indicates that for a hue angle, a certain color in the range of 0°–360° is designated as 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°, representing red, yellow, green, and blue hues, respectively (Pathare et al., 2013). Therefore, CS (8:2), BR (8:2), and BR (9:1) had high CIE b* and similar values compared to the other treatments, whereas BT (7:3) and CN (8:2) had relatively red colors and similar values. The high hue angle can be interpreted in two ways: oxidation of oxymyoglobin and reduction of nitrosyl hemochrome (da Conceição Jorge et al., 2015; Haile et al., 2013). Therefore, we expected that BT (7:3) and CN (8:2) would have a higher nitrosyl hemochrome content or lower oxidation of meat than CS (8:2) and BR (8:2 and 9:1).

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Color properties (hue angle) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–d Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

The moisture content was highest for BR (9:1) and lowest for BT (9:1) (Fig. 6). Qiao et al. (2001) showed that the moisture content was negatively correlated with CIE a* and positively correlated with CIE b*. Compared to the hue angle in this study, the moisture content of BR with high CIE b* was high, and the fact that BT had high CIE a* owing to low moisture was similar. In contrast, the gas compositions at 7:3 and 9:1 ratios showed significantly higher values than those at an 8:2 ratio (p<0.05); however, the cause was not identified. We believe that moisture content did not affect the gas composition ratio in this study.

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Moisture content of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A,B Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–e Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

The nitrosoheme content was significantly higher in the nitrogen-rich packaging (p<0.05). In addition, sous-vide ham (CN) with NPS showed high values at gas compositions of 7:3 and 8:2, and the CS treatment showed the highest value after CN treatment (Fig. 7). The residual amount of nitrite also showed that CN had a significantly higher value than the other treatments for all gas compositions (p<0.05). In the case of the CN treatment, the residual amount of nitrite was lowered when the nitrogento-oxygen ratio was 3:7 (Fig. 8). The nitrogen-rich gas composition helps maintain the adhesion of nitric oxide (NO) to heme iron in meat. Skibsted (2011) reported that NO affects the color stability of processed meat products and food storage safety.

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Nitrosoheme content of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A–C Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–g Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Nitrate residual (%) of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents. 1) Treatments=treatment type+gas concentration ratio. Treatment type: CN, control nitrite pickling salt; CS, control salt; BR, treatment brine; BT, treatment bittern. Gas concentration ratio: 73, gas (O2:N2) at concentration ratios of 7:3; 82, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 8:2; 91, gas (O2:N2) at a ratio of 9:1. A–C Mean values on the bars with different gas concentrations are significantly different (p<0.05). a–f Mean values on the bars with different treatments are significantly different (p<0.05).​​​​​​​

When the curing agent was analyzed, the NPS-treated CN and bittern seawater-treated BT were similar. BT had a significantly lower residual nitrite value than CN; however, both samples had a similar color appearance in terms of CIE a* and hue angle. Therefore, BT has a high potential as a natural curing agent. When analyzed together with the gas composition, CN (7:3) and BT (8:2) showed similar results.

Color correlation

CIE L* was positively correlated with hue value and moisture content (p<0.001) and negatively correlated with CIE b* (p<0.01), chroma, and nitrosoheme content (p<0.05). CIE a* was positively correlated with moisture and nitrosoheme levels (p<0.001), and negatively correlated with hue value, residual nitrite level (p<0.01), and chroma (p<0.05). CIE b* was positively correlated with nitrosoheme and residual nitrite levels (p<0.001), and negatively correlated with moisture (p<0.01) and hue value (p<0.05). Chroma positively correlated with residual nitrite levels (p<0.001) and negatively correlated with nitrosoheme (p<0.01) and moisture levels (p<0.05). The hue value negatively correlated with the residual nitrite level (p<0.01) and nitrosoheme content (p<0.05; Table 3).

Table 3. Correlation of the color properties of sous-vide pork ham with various curing agents​​​​​​​

CSSPBQ_2023_v43n4_580_t0003.png 이미지

Values are correlation coefficients for n=40.

* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

C*, chroma; H*, hue angle; MC, moisture content; NH, nitrosoheme; NR, residual nitrite.​​​​​​​

The higher the oxygen concentration in the packaging gas, the higher the CIE L* and hue angle; the higher the nitrogen concentration, the higher the CIE a*, thereby appealing to consumer preferences (Pereira and Malfeito-Ferreira, 2015). In contrast, because the hue angle increased as the value changed from CIE a* to CIE b*, the lower the value of the hue angle, the higher the CIE a*. Highly energetic NO gas represents nitrosomyoglobin, which exhibits strong stability by reacting with the Fe2+ of myoglobin (Wang et al., 2018). However, when nitrite/nitrate, a synthetic color preservative, is added and a high nitrogen gas composition is maintained, a high residual amount of nitrite is displayed, which can cause nitrosamine when consuming food (Jannat et al., 2014). Therefore, manufacturing meat products using seawater as a curing agent is possible, similar to those treated with NPS, by adjusting the moisture content and hue angle by altering the nitrogen concentration after reducing or removing the synthetic color preservative.

Conclusion

This study aimed to analyze whether seawater, as a natural curing agent, can have a positive effect on the appearance of sous-vide ham without affecting its quality characteristics. In addition, it is to analyze the gas composition that can maintain the meat color during the storage period. In terms of physicochemical properties, BT showed superior processing properties compared with the control group (CS). The seawater-treated group exhibited improved curing and cooking yields. Consequently, BT is considered to have better quality characteristics than CN and CS under equal conditions.

In terms of color properties, the CIE a* of CN (8:2), CN (9:1), BT (7:3), and BT (8:2) showed similar values. In the same gas composition, BT is judged to have a possibility to replace the synthetic compound (NPS) because it shows a lower amount of nitrite residue and nitrosoheme than CN. Moreover, the hue angles of the BT (7:3) and CN (8:2) groups were similar. Thus, sous-vide ham cured with BT and NPS and packed with gas compositions at 7:3 and 8:2 ratios showed similar colors.

Therefore, our results indicated that seawater can replace synthetic color preservatives by improving the physicochemical properties and preserving CIE a*. In addition, our study confirmed that the best possibility was to set the O2:N2 gas composition to 7:3 for bittered seawater sous-vide ham.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ0155902022)” of the Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Lee SH. Data curation: Lee SH, Kim HY. Formal analysis: Lee SH, Kim HY. Methodology: Lee SH, Kim HY. Software: Lee SH. Validation: Lee SH, Kim HY. Investigation: Lee SH, Kim HY. Writing - original draft: Lee SH. Writing - review & editing: Lee SH, Kim HY.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

  1. Arvanitoyannis IS, Stratakos AC. 2012. Application of modified atmosphere packaging and active/smart technologies to red meat and poultry: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1423-1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0803-z
  2. Banovic M, Grunert KG, Barreira MM, Fontes MA. 2009. Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: A study from Portugal. Food Qual Prefer 20:335-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.009
  3. Brody AL. 2002. Meat packaging: Past, present and future. 55th Reciprocal Meat Conference, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  4. Cipollina A, Misseri A, Staiti GDA, Galia A, Micale G, Scialdone O. 2012. Integrated production of fresh water, sea salt and magnesium from sea water. Desalination Water Treat 49:390-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.699340
  5. da Conceicao Jorge E, Mendes ACG, Auriema BE, Cazedey HP, Fontes PR, Ramos ALS, Ramos EM. 2015. Application of a check-all-that-apply question for evaluating and characterizing meat products. Meat Sci 100:124-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.10.002
  6. DeWitt CAM, Oliveira ACM. 2016. Modified atmosphere systems and shelf life extension of fish and fishery products. Foods 5:48.
  7. Farber JN, Harris LJ, Parish ME, Beuchat LR, Suslow TV, Gorney JR, Garrett EH, Busta FF. 2003. Microbiological safety of controlled and modified atmosphere packaging of fresh-cut produce. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2:142-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00032.x
  8. Feiner G. 2006. Meat products handbook: Practical science and technology. Woodhead, Sawston, UK.
  9. Fenger MHJ, Aschemann-Witzel J, Hansen F, Grunert KG. 2015. Delicious words: Assessing the impact of short storytelling messages on consumer preferences for variations of a new processed meat product. Food Qual Prefer 41:237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.016
  10. Flores M, Toldra F. 2021. Chemistry, safety, and regulatory considerations in the use of nitrite and nitrate from natural origin in meat products: Invited review. Meat Sci 171:108272.
  11. Garcia-Linares MC, Gonzalez-Fandos E, Garcia-Fernandez MC, Garcia-Arias MT. 2004. Microbiological and nutritional quality of sous vide or traditionally processed fish: Influence of fat content. J Food Qual 27:371-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2004.00676.x
  12. Haile DM, De Smet S, Claeys E, Vossen E. 2013. Effect of light, packaging condition and dark storage durations on colour and lipid oxidative stability of cooked ham. J Food Sci Technol 50:239-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0352-x
  13. James SJ. 2000. Raw material selection: Meat and poultry. In Chilled foods: A comprehensive guide. 2nd ed. Stringer M, Dennis C (ed). Woodhead, Sawston, UK. pp 63-78.
  14. Jannat M, Fatimah R, Kishida M. 2014. Nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-) are endocrine disruptors to downregulate expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and motor behavior through conversion to nitric oxide in early development of zebrafish. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 452:608-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.114
  15. Jiang Q, Nakazawa N, Hu Y, Osako K, Okazaki E. 2019. Changes in quality properties and tissue histology of lightly salted tuna meat subjected to multiple freeze-thaw cycles. Food Chem 293:178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.091
  16. Kausar T, Hanan E, Ayob O, Praween B, Azad ZRAA. 2019. A review on functional ingredients in red meat products. Bioinformation 15:358-363. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630015358
  17. Kim HW, Hwang KE, Song DH, Kim YJ, Ham YK, Lim YB, Jeong TJ, Choi YS, Kim CJ. 2015. Wheat fiber colored with a safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) red pigment as a natural colorant and antioxidant in cooked sausages. LWT-Food Sci Technol 64:350-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.064
  18. Lee SH, Kim HY. 2020. Effect of sodium nitrite, sodium chloride and concentrated seawater on physicochemical properties of meat emulsion system. Food Sci Anim Resour 40:980-989. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e68
  19. Lu X, Cornforth DP, Carpenter CE, Zhu L, Luo X. 2020. Effect of oxygen concentration in modified atmosphere packaging on color changes of the M. longissimus thoraces et lumborum from dark cutting beef carcasses. Meat Sci 161:107999.
  20. Majou D, Christieans S. 2018. Mechanisms of the bactericidal effects of nitrate and nitrite in cured meats. Meat Sci 145:273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.013
  21. McMillin KW. 2008. Where is MAP going? A review and future potential of modified atmosphere packaging for meat. Meat Sci 80:43-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.028
  22. Mwove JK, Gogo LA, Chikamai BN, Omwamba M, Mahungu SM. 2018. Principal component analysis of physicochemical and sensory characteristics of beef rounds extended with gum arabic from Acacia senegal var. kerensis. Food Sci Nutr 6:474-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.576
  23. Narasimha Rao D, Sachindra NM. 2002. Modified atmosphere and vacuum packaging of meat and poultry products. Food Rev Int 18:263-293.
  24. Orkusz A, Woloszyn J, Haraf G, Okruszek A. 2013. Effect of protective atmosphere on color of goose meat. Poult Sci 92:2188-2194. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02913
  25. Pathare PB, Opara UL, Al-Said FAJ. 2013. Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol 6:36-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0867-9
  26. Pereira M, Malfeito-Ferreira M. 2015. A simple method to evaluate the shelf life of refrigerated rabbit meat. Food Control 49:70-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.021
  27. Pinna A, Saccani G, Schivazappa C, Simoncini N, Virgili R. 2020. Revision of the cold processing phases to obtain a targeted salt reduction in typical Italian dry-cured ham. Meat Sci 161:107994.
  28. Qiao M, Fletcher DL, Smith DP, Northcutt JK. 2001. The effect of broiler breast meat color on pH, moisture, water-holding capacity, and emulsification capacity. Poult Sci 80:676-680. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.5.676
  29. Ruusunen M, Puolanne E. 2005. Reducing sodium intake from meat products. Meat Sci 70:531-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.016
  30. Seyfert M, Mancini RA, Hunt MC. 2004. Internal premature browning in cooked ground beef patties from high-oxygen modified-atmosphere packaging. J Food Sci 69:C721-C725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09923.x
  31. Skibsted LH. 2011. Nitric oxide and quality and safety of muscle based foods. Nitric Oxide 24:176-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2011.03.307
  32. Tapp WN III, Yancey JWS, Apple JK. 2011. How is the instrumental color of meat measured? Meat Sci 89:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.021
  33. Tomasevic I, Djekic I, Font-i-Furnols M, Terjung N, Lorenzo JM. 2021. Recent advances in meat color research. Curr Opin Food Sci 41:81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.02.012
  34. Tornberg E. 2005. Effects of heat on meat proteins: Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci 70:493-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.021
  35. Voutchkov N. 2011. Overview of seawater concentrate disposal alternatives. Desalination 273:205-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.018
  36. Wang Z, Tu J, Zhou H, Lu A, Xu B. 2021. A comprehensive insight into the effects of microbial spoilage, myoglobin autoxidation, lipid oxidation, and protein oxidation on the discoloration of rabbit meat during retail display. Meat Sci 172:108359.
  37. Wang ZC, Yan Y, Nisar T, Sun L, Su P, Chen DW, Guo Y. 2018. Influence of postmortem treatment with nitric oxide on the muscle color and color stability of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets. Nitrix Oxide 76:122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2017.09.009
  38. Yim DG, Shin DJ, Jo C, Nam KC. 2020. Effect of sodium-alternative curing salts on physicochemical properties during salami manufacture. Food Sci Anim Resour 40:946-956. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e65