DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of the Legal System for the Promotion of Opening and Utilization of Open Government Data - Focusing on cases of refusal to provide -

공공데이터의 개방·활용 촉진을 위한 법제도 개선방안 연구 - 공공데이터 제공거부 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2023.04.04
  • Accepted : 2023.06.05
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

There are criticisms that, despite the proactive government policy on open government data (hereinafter "open data"), certain highly demanded data remains restricted due to legal constraints. In this study, we aim to analyze the factors that limit the opening and utilization of open data, focusing on cases wherein requests for open data provision have been denied. We will explore possible approaches that are in harmony with the Open Data Law while examining the constitutional value of open data, considering the foundational Open Data Charter that underpins the government's data policy. We will also examine cases wherein requests for data provision have been denied for institutional reasons, with nearly half of these cases involving open data that includes personal information. It is necessary to explore the potential for improvement in these cases. Furthermore, considering the recent amendment to the Personal Information Protection Act, which allows for the processing of pseudonymous information without the consent of the data subject for limited purposes, it is an opportune time to consider the need for amending the Open Data Law to facilitate broader access and utilization of open data for the nation. Lastly, we will propose institutional improvement directions aligned with the opening and utilization of open data by examining the constraints of and need for improvement in the selected target laws.

정부의 적극적인 공공데이터 정책에도 일부 수요가 많은 데이터가 법률을 근거로 여전히 개방되지 못한다는 지적이 있다. 본고에서는 국민의 공공데이터 제공신청이 제공거부된 사례를 중심으로 개별분야 법률이 공공데이터 개방·활용에 제약으로 작용하는 요인을 분석하고 공공데이터법과 상호 조화되는 방안을 모색해보고자 한다. 이를 위해 공공데이터 정책의 근간이 된 오픈데이터 헌장과 함께 공공데이터의 헌법적 가치를 살펴보고, 헌법적 가치를 토대로 제도적 사유로 제공거부된 사례들을 검토한다. 개인정보가 포함된 공공데이터가 대표적인데, 제도적 사유로 제공거부 된 사례의 절반 가까이 차지하고 있어 그 개선 가능성을 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 특히 개인정보 보호법이 개정되어 제한적 목적으로 정보주체의 동의 없이 가명정보 처리가 가능해졌으므로, 국민의 공공데이터에 대한 접근과 이용 확대를 위한 공공데이터법의 개정 필요성을 검토할 시점이다. 또한 선별한 개선 대상 법률들에 대하여 제약요인과 개선 필요성을 검토하여 공공데이터 개방·활용과 조화를 이루기 위한 제도적 개선방향을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bang, E. (2022). "Unveiled Digital Platform Government... Special Law to be Established Within 2 Year." ZDNet Korea, May 18. https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20220518160539, (Retrieved on March 6)
  2. Chief Legislation and Judiciary Committee (2020). "[2105488] a partial amendment of the Civil Procedure Act." http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/billDetail.do?billId=PRC_Z2P0P1B1J1O7N2D3E0L8X4Z5R2X1J8 (Retrieved on March 6) 
  3. HIRA(Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service) (2021). "Explanation on the Press Release of the Korean Medical Association and National Health Insurance Service's Open Data Provision." https://www.hira.or.kr/bbsDummy.do?brdBltNo=10383&brdScnBltNo=4&pgmid=HIRAA020041000100#none, (Retrieved on March 6).
  4. Jeon, E. (2019). "A study on the use of open government data and data processing for statistical and scientific research purposes." Journal of Information Law, 23(1), 106-152. 
  5. Jeong, P. (2018). "Trends and Orientations of Establishment of Fundamental Rights on Information to Adaptto the New Media Environment." Journal of Media and Defamation Law, 4(1), 1-51. 
  6. Kim, B. (2016). "The Character and Contents of the Right to Know." Constitutional Law Review, 27, 183-243. 
  7. Kim, E. (2019). "The Open Data Charter and Korea's Open Data Policy." Global Open Data Now, 13, 3-17, Daegu: National Information Society Agency. 
  8. Kim, J. (2022). "Improvement of Legislation for the Proper use of health and medical data." Korea University Law Review, 106, 437-481.  https://doi.org/10.36532/kulri.2022.106.437
  9. KLIC(Korean Law Information Center) "Official Information Disclosure Act Reasons for amendment." [Enforcement Date 30. July, 2004.] [Act No.7127 29. Jan, 2004., Whole Amendment] https://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=58991&ancYd=20040129&ancNo=07127&efYd=20040730&nwJoYnInfo=N&efGubun=Y&chrClsCd=010202&ancYnChk=0#0000 (Retrieved on March  6).
  10. Kwon, H. (2013). "Expansion of Right to Information and Reuse of Public Sector Information." Law and Legislation, 2013(4), 24-45. 
  11. Kwon, H. Kim, D. Jeong, J. Song, S. & Oh, J. (2019). Development Process of Open Data Policy. Ministry of the Interior and Safety & National Information Society Agency Global-Center Global-Academy. 
  12. Lee, C. (2021), "A Study on Legal Issues of Data Portability and the Direction of Legislative Policy." Informatization Policy, 28(4), 54-75.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2021.28.4.054
  13. Lee, D. (2012). "The Protection of Personal Information in Tax Matters." Kyungpook Natl. Univ. Law Journal, 39, 279-316. 
  14. Lee, G. & Baek, S. (2020). "A Study on Requirements of Objects of Trade Secret and Maintenance of Its Secrecy." Chung-ang Law Review, 22(1), 7-47. 
  15. MOIS(Ministry of the Interior and Safety Agency) & NIA(National Information Society Agency) (2021). Practical Manual for Public Data Provision and Management, October 26. 
  16. MOIS(Ministry of the Interior and Safety Agency), PIPC(Personal Information Protection Commission) & NIA(National Information Society Agency) (2021). Guidelines for Providing Pseudonymized Information in Public Sectors. January. 
  17. Oh, J. Lim, H. Lee, H. & Shin, S. (2021). "A Study of open government data policies as risk management tools to address COVID-19 pandemic : Focusing on comparative analysis of cases in major overseas countries." STEPI, 4(1), 46-69. 
  18. Open Data Charter. "Open Data Charter Government adopters." https://opendatacharter.net/government-adopters/ (Retrieved on March 6).
  19. ODSC(Open Data Strategy Counsil) (2022). 2022 Implementation Plans for Promoting and use of Public Data, February 10. 
  20. OPM(Office for Government Policy Coordination Prime Monister's Secretariat) press release (2014). "The government will completely revise laws that restrict the disclosure and sharing of public information." https://www.opm.go.kr/flexer/view.do?ftype=hwp&attachNo=75266 (Retrieved on March 6). 
  21. Rep. Kang Min-jung 10 people including (2021) "[2110095] a Partial amendment of the Public Service Ethics Act." http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/billDetail.do?billId=PRC_C2Y1T0Z4T0Q7Q1U3N3Q7H1M2Y3M0D4 (Retrieved on March 6) 
  22. Seo, H. (2017). "A Critical Review on Open, Useful, Reusable Government Data Index by OECD with Level of Domestic Open Government Data : Focusing on Comparison with Open Data Barometer." Informatization Policy, 24(1), 43-67.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.2.043
  23. Yoon, S. & Kwon, H. (2021). "Analysis of the Global Data Law & Policy and its Implications: Focusing on the cases of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union." Informatization Policy, 28(2), 98-113.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2021.28.2.098