Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

  • Volume 35
  • /
  • Pages.46.1-46.12
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-3618(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2052-4374(eISSN)
The Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (대한직업환경의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association between unpredictable work schedule and work-family conflict in Korea

  • Sang Moon Choi (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chan Woo Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hyoung Ouk Park (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yong Tae Park (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.06.24
  • Accepted : 2023.10.26
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: As unpredictable work schedule (UWS) has increased worldwide, various studies have been conducted on the resulting health effects on workers. However, research on the effect of UWS on workers' well-being in Korea is still insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between UWS and work-family conflict (WFC) using 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). Methods: Both UWS and WFC were measured using self-reported questionnaires, using data from the 6th KWCS conducted between 2020 and 2021, including 31,859 participants. UWS was measured by questions regarding the frequency of changes in work schedules and limited advanced notice. WFC was measured by questions regarding work to family and family to work conflicts. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between UWS and WFC. Results: The prevalence of UWS was higher among men, those under 40 years old, service and sales workers and blue-collar workers, and those with higher salaries. Workplace size also influenced UWS prevalence, with smaller workplaces (less than 50 employees) showing a higher prevalence. The odds ratio (OR) for WFC was significantly higher in workers with UWS compared to workers without UWS after adjusting for gender, age, marital status, occupation, salary, education, weekly working hours, shift work, company size, and having a child under the age of 18 years, employment status (OR: 3.71; 95% confidence interval: 3.23-4.25). Conclusions: The analysis of nationwide data revealed that UWS interferes with workers' performance of family roles, which can lead to WFC. Our findings suggest that it is crucial to implement policies to address unfair work schedule management, promoting a healthier work-life balance and fostering a conducive environment for family responsibilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Caldbick S, Labonte R, Mohindra KS, Ruckert A. Globalization and the rise of precarious employment: the new frontier for workplace health promotion. Glob Health Promot 2014;21(2):23-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975913514781
  2. Vosko LF. Precarious Employment: Towards an Improved Understanding of Labour Market Insecurity. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press; 2006, 3-39. 
  3. Fudge J, Owens R. Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: the Challenge to Legal Norms. London, UK: Hart Publishing; 2006, 3-28. 
  4. Kalleberg AL. Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. Am Sociol Rev 2009;74(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
  5. Henly JR, Lambert SJ. Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: implications for employee work-life conflict. Ind Labor Relat Rev 2014;67(3):986-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793914537458
  6. Lee HE, Kawachi I. Association between unpredictable work schedules and depressive symptoms in Korea. Saf Health Work 2021;12(3):351-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.01.008
  7. Howard J. Nonstandard work arrangements and worker health and safety. Am J Ind Med 2017;60(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22669
  8. Maestas N, Mullen KJ, Powell D, Von Wachter T, Wenger JB. Working Conditions in the United States. Results of the 2015 American Working Conditions Survey. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2017.
  9. Maestas N, Mullen KJ, Powell D, von Wachter T, Wenger JB. The American Working Conditions Survey Data: Codebook and Data Description. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2017.
  10. Parent-Thirion A, Biletta I, Cabrita J, Llave Vargas O, Vermeylen G, Wilczynska A, et al. 6th European Working Conditions Survey: Overview Report, 2017 Update. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
  11. Shin Y. Study on working-time arrangements types of Korean worker and its determinants. Q J Labor Policy 2018;18(1):135-67. 
  12. Schneider D, Harknett K. Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and wellbeing. Am Sociol Rev 2019;84(1):82-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418823184
  13. Kossek EE, Lee KH. Work-family conflict and work-life conflict. Oxf Res Encycl Bus Manag. Forthcoming 2017.
  14. Michel JS, Kotrba LM, Mitchelson JK, Clark MA, Baltes BB. Antecedents of work-family conflict: a meta-analytic review. J Organ Behav 2011;32(5):689-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695
  15. Glavin P, Schieman S. Work-family role blurring and work-family conflict: the moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work Occup 2012;39(1):71-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406295
  16. Greenhaus JH, Collins KM, Shaw JD. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. J Vocat Behav 2003;63(3):510-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
  17. Obrenovic B, Jianguo D, Khudaykulov A, Khan MAS. Work-family conflict impact on psychological safety and psychological well-being: a job performance model. Front Psychol 2020;11:475.
  18. Lunau T, Bambra C, Eikemo TA, van der Wel KA, Dragano N. A balancing act? Work-life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states. Eur J Public Health 2014;24(3):422-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku010
  19. Borgmann LS, Rattay P, Lampert T. Health-related consequences of work-family conflict from a European perspective: results of a scoping review. Front Public Health 2019;7:189.
  20. Yun J, Kim CY, Son SH, Bae CW, Choi YS, Chung SH. Birth rate transition in the Republic of Korea: trends and prospects. J Korean Med Sci 2022;37(42):e304.
  21. Kwon TH. Trends and implications of delayed and non-marriage in Korea. Asian Popul Stud 2007;3(3):223-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730701746367
  22. Borgmann LS, Kroll LE, Muters S, Rattay P, Lampert T. Work-family conflict, self-reported general health and work-family reconciliation policies in Europe: results from the European Working Conditions Survey 2015. SSM Popul Health 2019;9:100465.
  23. Choi BY, Min JY, Ryoo SW, Min KB. Use of work-related communication technology outside regular working hours and work-family conflict (work interference with family and family interference with work): results from the 6th Korean working conditions survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022;34:e44.
  24. Anderson SE, Coffey BS, Byerly RT. Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. J Manag 2002;28(6):787-810.
  25. Moen P, Kelly EL, Tranby E, Huang Q. Changing work, changing health: can real work-time flexibility promote health behaviors and well-being? J Health Soc Behav 2011;52(4):404-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146511418979
  26. Kelly EL, Moen P, Tranby E. Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. Am Sociol Rev 2011;76(2):265-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400056
  27. McElwain AK, Korabik K, Rosin HM. An examination of gender differences in work-family conflict. Can J Behav Sci 2005;37(4):283-98.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087263
  28. Bianchi SM, Sayer LC, Milkie MA, Robinson JP. Housework: who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Soc Forces 2012;91(1):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120
  29. KOSIS. Population trend survey. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B83A05&checkFlag=N. Updated 2023. Accessed September 13, 2023. 
  30. Rubenstein AL, Morrison HM, Whiting SW, Bosco FA. More money, more problems? An examination of the dynamic relationship between income and work-family conflict. J Occup Organ Psychol 2022;95(2):305-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12387
  31. Statistics Korea. Household financial welfare survey. https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301040300&bid=215. Updated 2022. Accessed May 9, 2023. 
  32. Ko K, Hwang W. Association between job demands and fathers' involvement between single-income and dual-income families: the mediating role of work to family conflict. J Soc Serv Res 2021;47(4):553-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2020.1850605
  33. Adkins CL, Premeaux SF. Spending time: the impact of hours worked on work-family conflict. J Vocat Behav 2012;80(2):380-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.003
  34. Alam MS, Biswas K, Hassan K. A test of association between working hour and work family conflict: a glimpse on Dhaka's female white collar professionals. Int J Bus Manag 2009;4(5):27-35.
  35. Lee Y, Lee S, Kim YJ, Kim Y, Kim SY, Kang D. Relationship between of working hours, weekend work, and shift work and work-family conflicts among Korean manufacturers. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022;34(1):e20.
  36. Johnson JV, Lipscomb J. Long working hours, occupational health and the changing nature of work organization. Am J Ind Med 2006;49(11):921-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20383
  37. Campbell I. Extended working hours in Australia. Labour Ind 2002;13(1):91-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2002.10669258
  38. Schieman S, Badawy PJ, Milkie M, Bierman A. Work-life conflict during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius 2021;7:2378023120982856.
  39. Chai L, Schieman S. Work-to-family conflict and children's problems with school, friends, and health: household economic conditions and couple relationship quality as contingencies. J Fam Issues 2022;43(6):1555-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211026953