DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

프랑스 집합주거건축의 깊이 있는 외피에 대한 연구 - 앙리 시리아니와 로랑 살로몽의 작품을 중심으로 -

Exploring the Deep Envelope of Collective Housing Architecture in France - Focused on Henri Ciriani's & Laurent Salomon's Works -

  • Cho, In Ho (Dept. of Architecture, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.12
  • 심사 : 2023.05.26
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30

초록

The purpose of this study is to reveal the transformation of modern buildings from standalone structures juxtaposed amidst streets, representing the dissolution of the urban block, to contextual objects that contribute to the construction of traditional urban spaces. This evolution is achieved through the adjustment of the envelope composition method at block boundaries in response to urban block reconstructions. Through a case study focusing on French housing examples that exemplify the urban architectural trend of delineating distinct exterior spaces on both the front and rear sides of the building, this study investigates how the envelope composition method is adjusted to differentiate the exterior of the envelope from the interior while preserving the characteristic forms of modern architecture known as pellicle and object. The findings demonstrate that the pellicle is reconfigured through the use of folded, overlapped, or attached planes, which generate spatial layers on the envelope and establish a boundary between the urban space and the dwelling space. This process signifies multiple stratification, wherein traditional architecture's binary separation, characterized by a thick poché, and modern architecture's unidirectional continuity, defined by a thin pellicle, transition into a gradual articulation with multiple thin spatial layers between the inside and outside.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년도 강원대학교 대학회계의 지원을 받아 수행한 연구임.

참고문헌

  1. Ching, F. D. K., Jarzombek, M. M., & Prakash, V. (2006). A Global History of Architecture, Wiley, 131.
  2. Ciriani, H. (1996). Pratique de la piece urbaine, ma petite utopie, les Mini PA, 14, Editions du Pavillon de l'Arsenal, 20, 24-27.
  3. Fortin, J.-P. (2000). Grands ensembles, l'espace et ses raisons, Collection Recherches, 125, Plan Urbanisme Construction Architecture, 20.
  4. Galantino, M. (2000). Henri Ciriani : Architecture 1960-2000, Skira/Seuil, 94, 100.
  5. Jallon, B., Napolitano, U., & Boutte, F. (2017). Paris Haussmann : Modele de Ville, Editions du Pavillon de l'Arsenal, 42-43.
  6. Jeanneret, J., Wittner, L., Coanus, T., & Salomon, L.?(1990). De l'Habitat a l'Urbanite, Meyzieu Operation Cetre-ville, Plan construction et Architecture, Conception et Usage de l'habitat, Ministere de l'Equipement, du Logement, des Transports et de la Mer, 33.
  7. Johnson, P., & Hitchcock, H.-R. (1997). The International Style, W. W. Norton & Company, 55-89.
  8. Kang, T.-W. (2009). A veiled origin of urban design of modernism in architecture, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 25(11), 287.
  9. Kang, T.-W., & Kim, T.-S. (2014). A prism of urban theory of modernism in architecture, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 30(3), 179.
  10. Lapierre, E. (2002). Identification d'une Ville, Architecture de Paris, A&J Picard, 234.
  11. Lucan, J. (2004). Genealogie du poche, de l'espace au vide, Matieres, 41-47.
  12. Panerai, P., Castex, J., & Depaule, J.-C. (1975). Forme Urbaine, de l'Ilot a la Barre, Editions Parentheses, 36, 83, 102, 131-2.
  13. Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (1979). Collage City, The MIT Press, 102, 104
  14. Rowe, C., & Slutzky, R. (1997). Transparency, Birkha user Verlag, 72.
  15. Singelebberg, P. (1972). H. P. Berlage, Idea and Style, Haentjens Dekker & Gumbert, 177
  16. Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, The Museum of Modern Art, 70-87.