Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Status of Data Repositories in the Field of Geoscience and Ways to Obtain Coretrustseal Certification: Focusing on re3data.org and Coretrustseal best practices

Geoscience 분야 데이터 리포지터리 현황과 Coretrustseal 인증 획득 방안에 관한 연구 - re3data.org와 Coretrustseal 인증 모범사례를 중심으로 -

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 연구데이터융복합연구소)
  • Received : 2023.05.27
  • Accepted : 2023.06.17
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A data repository is being used as a tool for sharing and preserving research data. This study was conducted to investigate the current status of data repositories and to propose methods for obtaining Coretrustseal certification. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, the current status of data repositories in the field of Geoscience was investigated at re3data.org, and 10 best practices that obtained Coretrustseal certification were analyzed among the repositories. First, as a result of identifying the current status of repositories, the United States, Germany, and Canada accounted for 66% of the total repositories by country, and in the case of CTS certification, the proportion of the United States, Europe, and Germany was 58%. Next, as a way to secure CTS certification, necessary details and requirements in terms of data policy, organizational infrastructure, and technical infrastructure were presented. It is hoped that the results of this study will be helpful in establishing and operating domestic data repositories and obtaining CTS certification.

연구데이터 공유 및 보존을 위한 도구로 데이터 리포지터리가 활용되고 있다. 본 연구는 데이터 리포지터리 현황을 조사하고 Coretrustseal 인증 획득 방안을 제안하기 위하여 수행되었다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여 re3data.org에서 Geoscience 분야의 데이터 리포지터리 현황에 대해 조사하였고 해당 리포지터리 중 Coretrustseal 인증을 획득한 10개의 모범사례를 분석하였다. 먼저, 리포지터리 현황을 파악한 결과, 국가별로 미국, 독일, 캐나다가 전체 리포지터리 중 66%를 차지하고 있으며 CTS 인증 현황 경우 미국, 유럽 그리고 독일의 비중이 58%로 나타났다. 다음으로 CTS 인증 확보를 위한 방안으로서 데이터 정책, 조직 인프라 그리고 기술 인프라 측면에서의 필요한 세부내용 및 요구사항을 제시하였다. 추후 본 연구 결과가 국내의 데이터 리포지터리 구축 및 운영 그리고 CTS 인증 획득에 도움이 되길 기대해본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Han, Jong Kyu (2019). Research data repository building experience and challenges (Geoscience). 19 Korea Special Library Association-National Association for Policy Information Joint Academic Seminar, June 27, 2019. Yeosu: The Ocean Resort Hotel.
  2. Cho, J. (2019). Study of Asian RDR based on re3data. The Electronic Library, 37(2), 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2019-0016
  3. coretrustseal (2023, April 8). CORETRUSTSEAL. Available: https://www.coretrustseal.org/
  4. Donaldson, D. R. (2020). Certification information on trustworthy digital repository websites: A content analysis. PloS One, 15(12), e0242525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242525
  5. Downs, R. (2021). Improving opportunities for new value of open data: assessing and certifying research data repositories. Data Science Journal, 20(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-001
  6. FAIRsFAIR (2023, April 15). FAIRsFAIR. Available: https://www.fairsfair.eu/
  7. Frank, R. D. (2022). Risk in the CoreTrustSeal data repository certification process. iConference 2022 Posters. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113742
  8. Khan, A. M., Loan, F. A., Parray, U. Y., & Rashid, S. (2023). Global overview of research data repositories: an analysis of re3data registry. Information Discovery and Delivery, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2022-0069
  9. Khan, N., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2022), Are data repositories fettered? a survey of current practices, challenges and future technologies. Online Information Review, 46(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2021-0204
  10. Kindling, M., Pampel, H., Sandt, S. van de, Rucknagel, J., Vierkant, P., Kloska, G., Witt, M., Schirmbacher, P., Bertelmann, R., & Scholze, F. (2017). The Landscape of research data repositories in 2015: A re3data analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 23(3/4). https://doi.org/10.1045/march2017-kindling.
  11. Lindlar, M. & Rudnik, P. (2019). Eye on CoreTrustSeal - Recommendations for criterion R0 from digital preservation and research data management perspectives. 16th International Conference on Digital Preservation iPRES 2019, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3267689
  12. Misgar, S. M., Bhat, A., & Wani, Z. A. (2020), A study of Open Access research data repositories developed by BRICS countries. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-02-2020-0012
  13. Peng, G., Gross, W. S., & Edmunds, R. (2022). Crosswalks among stewardship maturity assessment approaches promoting trustworthy FAIR data and repositories. Sci Data 9, 576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01683-x
  14. Pisharoti, N. & Petters, J. L. (2019). An assessment of VTechData with respect to the CoreTrustSeal Repository Certification Requirements. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/89054
  15. re3data (2023, April 5). re3data.org. Available: https://www.re3data.org/