Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grants funded by the Korean government NRF-2016R1A5A1013919 and NRF-2021M2D2A2076383.
References
- SSP-09/442-U, CASMO-4E: Extended Capability CASMO-4 User's Manual, Studsvik Scandpower, 2009.
- SSP-09/447-U, SIMULATE-3: advanced three-dimensional two-group reactor analysis code user's manual, Studsvik Scandpower, 2009.
- T. Downar, Y. Xu, V. Seker, PARCS NRC Core Neutronics Simulator Theory Manual, 2009 (Ann Arbor, MI).
- J.Y. Cho, DeCART2D V1.1 User's Manual. KAERI/UM-40/2016, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2016.
- Jin Young Cho, Jae Seung Song, Kyung Hoon Lee, Three Dimensional Nuclear Analysis System DeCART/CHORUS/MASTER, ANS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, 2013. June 16-20.
- Piotr Darnowski, Michal Pawluczyk, Analysis of the BEAVRS PWR benchmark using SCALE and PARCS, NUKLEONIKA 64 (3) (2019) 87-96. https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2019-0011
- Jaakko Lepp€ anen, Riku Mattila, Validation of the Serpent-ARES code sequence using the MIT BEAVRS benchmark - HFP conditions and fuel cycle 1 simulations, Annals of Nuclear Energy 96 (2016) 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.014
- K.S. Smith, Assembly homogenization techniques for light water reactor analysis, Progress in Nuclear Energy 17 (3) (1986) 303-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(86)90035-1
- Jaeha Kim, Yonghee Kim, Three-dimensional pin-resolved transient diffusion analysis of PWR core by the Hybrid coarse-mesh finite difference algorithm, Nuclear Science and Engineering 194 (2020) 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1642016
- K.R. Rempe, K.S. Smith, A.F. Henry, SIMULATE-3 pin power reconstruction: methodology and benchmarking, Nuclear Science and Engineering 103 (1989) 334.
- H. Finnemann, F. Bennewitz, M.R. Wagner, Interface current techniques for multidimensional reactor calculations, Atomkernenergie 30 (1977) 123-128.
- R.D. Lawrence, Progress in nodal methods for the solution of the neutron diffusion and transport equations, Progress in Nuclear Energy 17 (3) (1986) 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(86)90034-X
- Seongdong Jang, Yonghee Kim, Improved macroscopic depletion in 2-D nodal analysis by 2x2 albedo-corrected parametrized equivalence constants method, Annals of Nuclear Energy 175 (2022), 109209.
- Tae-suk Oh, Yonghee Kim, Polynomial relaxation in the quasi-static approach and its implementation in nonlinear reactor transient analyses, Annals of Nuclear Energy 158 (2021), 108271.
- Tae-suk Oh, Yonghee Kim, Investigation of nodal numerical adjoints from CMFD-based acceleration methods, Front. Energy Res. 10 (2022), 873731.
- D. Basile, M. Beghi, R. Chierici, E. Salina, E. Brega, COBRA-EN: an upgraded version of the COBRA-3C/MIT code for thermal hydraulic transient analysis of light water reactor fuel assemblies and cores, Radiat. Saf. Inf. Comput. Center, Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. (1999).
- C.W. Stewart, et al., VIPRE-01: a Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis Code for Reactor Cores. EPRI NP-2511 CCM, Electric Power Research Institute Research Project, 1983, 1584-1.
- J.C. Gehin, A Quasi Static Polynomial Nodal Method for Nuclear Reactor Analysis, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Nuclear Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.
- Bumhee Cho, Nam Zin Cho, A nonoverlapping local/global iterative method with 2-D/1-D fusion transport kernel and p-CMFD wrapper for transient reactor analysis, Annals of Nuclear Energy 85 (2015) 937-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.07.012
- Maria Pusa, Jaakko Leppanen, Computing the matrix exponential in burnup € calculations, Nuclear Science and Engineering 164 (2) (2010) 140-150. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-14
- Taesuk Oh, Yonghee Kim, Fission Yield Correction for Simplified Xe-135 and Sm-149 Decay Chains, Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, 2022. May 19-20.
- Hwanyeal Yu, Seongdong Jang, Yonghee Kim, A new embedded analysis with pinwise discontinuity factors for pin power reconstruction, Nuclear Science and Engineering 195 (7) (2021) 766-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1867435
- J. Leppanen, et al., The Serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013, Annals of Nuclear Energy 82 (2015) 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
- Benchmark Problem Book, ANL-7416, Suppl. 2, Argonne National Laboratory, 1977.
- E.Z. Muller, Z.J. Weiss, Benchmarking with the multigroup diffusion high-order response matrix method, Annals of Nuclear Energy 18 (9) (1991) 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(91)90098-I
- Y.H. Kim, N.Z. Cho, A bilinear weighting method for the control rod cusping problem in nodal methods, Journal of Korean Nuclear Society 22 (1990) p238.
- S. Langenbuch, et al., Coarse-mesh flux expansion method for the analysis of space-time effects in large light water reactor cores, Nuclear Science and Engineering 63 (1977) 437-456. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A27061
- H. Finnemann, H. Bauer, A. Galati, NEACRP 3-D LWR Core Transient Benchmarks, vol. 93, NEA/NSC/DOC., 1993, 25[R]. [s.1.]: OECD/NEA.
- N.Z. Cho, Benchmark Problems in Reactor and Particle Transport Physics: Benchmark Problem 1A ~ 3A, 2000.
- D.N. Horelik, et al., Benchmark for evaluation and validation of reactor simulations, MIT Computational Reactor Physics Group 29 (August) (2018) rev09.
- J. Kotchoubey, POLCA-T Neutron Kinetics Model Benchmarking, Master's Thesis, Division of Nuclear Reactor Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2015.
- K.S. Smith, An Analytic Nodal Method for Solving the Two-Group, Multidimensional Static and Transient Neutron Diffusion Equations, Master's Thesis, Department of Nuclear Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1979.
- M.P. Knight, P. Bryce, Derivation of a refined PANTHER solution to the NEACRP PWR rod ejection transients, in: Proc. Joint Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing for Nuclear Applications, Saratoga Springs, N.Y., American Nuclear Society, vol. 1, 1997, pp. 302-313.
- H. Finnemann, H. Bauer, A. Galati, R. Martinelli, Results of LWR core transient benchmarks. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:25052610, 1993.
- https://engineering.purdue.edu/PARCS/Code/TestSuite/Calculation/Mode/StandAloneMode/NEACRPPWR.
- C. Wan, L. Cao, H. Wu, W. Shen, Uncertainty analysis for the assembly and core simulation of BEAVRS at HZP conditions, Nuclear Engineering and Design 314 (2017) 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.01.005
- Min Ryu, et al., Solution of the BEAVRS benchmark using the nTRACER direct whole core calculation code, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 52 (7-8) (2015) 961-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1038664
- Kan Wang, et al., Analysis of BEAVRS two-cycle benchmark using RMC based on full core detailed model, Progress in Nuclear Energy 98 (2017) 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.009