한국항공운항학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics)

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.46-54
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-9705(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1791(eISSN)
한국항공운항학회 (The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP 방법을 통한 헬리콥터 다빈도 사고의인적오류 위험도 분석에 관한 연구

A Study on Human Error Risk Analysis of Helicopter Frequent Accidents through AHP Method

  • 유태정 (극동대학교 헬리콥터UAM조종학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.27
  • 심사 : 2023.06.18
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Helicopter pilots are required to perform many visual workloads in topographical avoidance, flight path modification and navigation, because helicopters operate at very low altitudes. The helicopter-specific instability also require the pilot to have precise perception and control. This has caused frequent human error in helicopter accidents. In Korea, two to three cases have occurred annually on average over the past 10 years, and this trend has not decreased. The purpose of this study was to identify human error risks in advance to prevent helicopter accidents and to help develop measures for missions and mission phases with high risk of human error. Through the study, the tasks and mission phases where accidents occur frequently were classified and the risk of human error was calculated for each mission phases. To this end, the task of frequent accidents during helicopter missions was first identified, detailed steps were classified, and the number of accidents was analyzed. Next, the AHP survey program was developed to measure the pilot's risk of human error and the survey was conducted on the pilots. Finally, the risk of human error by helicopter mission and by mission phases calculated and compared with the actual number of accidents.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alberto P., "Applying analytic hierarchy process (ahp) to choose a human factors technique: choosing the suitable human reliability analysis technique for the automotive industry", Safety Science, 119, 2017, pp.229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.007
  2. Badri, A., Nadeau, S., and Gbodossou, A., "Proposal of a risk-factor-based analytical approach for integrating occupational health and safety into project risk evaluation", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 2012, pp.223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.009
  3. Chen, B. C., and Chen, J. G., "Fuzzy AHP-based safety risk assessment methodolgy for tower-crane", Jounal of Applied Sciences, 13(31), 2013, pp.2598-2601. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2013.2598.2601
  4. Coleman, M. E. and Marks, H. M., "Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment", Food Control, 10(4-5), 1999, pp.289-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(99)00052-3
  5. Freivalds, A., "Comparison of United-States (NIOSH lifting guidelines) and European (ECSC force limits) recommendations for manual work limits", American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 48(8), 1987, pp.698-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668791385444
  6. Henderson, R. D., and Dutta, S. P., "Use of the analytic hierarchy process in ergonomic analysis", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 9(4), 1992, pp.275-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(92)90061-4
  7. Kim, H., Lee, H. S., Park, M., and Lee, K. P., "Influence factor-based safety risk assessment methodology for construction site". Construction Research Congress 2010-ASCE, 2010, pp.1356-1365.
  8. Kirwan, B., "A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment", Taylor and Francis, 1994, pp.236-244.
  9. Locke, E. A., Zavala, A., Fleishman, E. A.,, "Studies of helicopter pilot performance. II. The analysis of task dimensions", Hum Factors, 7(3), 1965, pp.285-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086500700311
  10. Norcio, A. F., Stanley, J., "Adaptive human-computer interfaces: A literature survey and perspective", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 19(2), 1989, pp.399-408. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.31042
  11. Padma, T., and Balasubramanie, P., "Knowledge based decision support system to assist work-related risk analysis in musculoskeletal disorder", Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(1), 2009, pp.72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2008.07.001
  12. Park, K. S., "A new method for estimating human error probability: AHP-SLIM, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93(4), 2008, pp.578-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.02.003
  13. Rivolier J., "Stress et Situations Extremes", Paris (France): Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.
  14. Saaty, T. L., "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 1990, pp. 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  15. Saman, A., Murat, G., and Rifat, S., "Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects", Journal of Safety Research, 46, 2013, pp.99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003
  16. Yu, T. J., Kwon, Y. G., and Song, B. H., "Classification and analysis of human error accidents of helicopter pilots in Korea", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 28(4), 2020, pp.21-31. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2020.28.4.021
  17. Zhang, Y., Zhan, Y. L., and Tan, Q. M., "Studies on human factors in marine engine accident", Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling: KAM, 1, 2009, pp.134-137.