DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of orthodontic bonding with different surface treatments on color stability and translucency of full cubic stabilized zirconia after coffee thermocycling

  • Yasamin Babaee Hemmati (Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hamid Neshandar Asli (Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Alireza Mahmoudi Nahavandi (Color Imaging and Color Image Processing Department, Institute for Color Science and Technology) ;
  • Nika Safari (Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Mehran Falahchai (Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2022.06.28
  • Accepted : 2022.11.27
  • Published : 2023.05.25

Abstract

Objective: To assess the color stability and translucency of full cubic stabilized zirconia (FSZ) following orthodontic bonding with different surface treatments and coffee thermocycling (CTC). Methods: This in vitro study was conducted on 120 disc-shaped specimens of FSZ. Thirty specimens were selected as the control group and remained intact. The remaining specimens were randomly divided into three groups based on the type of surface treatment (n = 30): airborne particle abrasion (APA), silica-coating (CoJet), and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. After metal bracket bonding in the test groups, debonding and polishing were performed. Subsequently, all specimens underwent CTC (10,000 cycles). Color parameters, color difference (ΔE00), and translucency parameter (TP) were measured three times at baseline (t0), after debonding and polishing (t1), and after CTC (t2). Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). Results: Significant difference existed among the groups regarding ΔE00t0t2 (p < 0.001). The APA group showed minimum (ΔE00 = 1.15 ± 0.53) and the control group showed maximum (ΔE00 = 0.19 ± 0.02) color stability, with no significant difference between the laser and CoJet groups (p = 0.511). The four groups were significantly different regarding ΔTPt0t2 (p < 0.001). Maximal increases in TP were noted in the CoJet (1.00 ± 0.18) and APA (1.04 ± 0.38) groups while minimal increase was recorded in the control group (0.1 ± 0.02). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment makes zirconia restorations susceptible to discoloration and increased translucency. Nonetheless, the recorded ΔE00 and ΔTP did not exceed the acceptability threshold.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Our grateful thanks are extended to Dr. Mohammad Ebrahim Ghaffari with a PhD degree in Biostatistics for his help in doing the meteorological data analysis.

References

  1. Subasi MG, Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effects of fabrication and shading technique on the color and translucency of new-generation translucent zirconia after coffee thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:603-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.018
  2. Asli HN, Rahimabadi S, Falahchai M. Flexural strength of monolithic zirconia after different surface treatments. World J Dent 2019;10:264-9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1653
  3. Babaee Hemmati Y, Neshandar Asli H, Falahchai M, Safary S. Effect of different surface treatments and orthodontic bracket type on shear bond strength of high-translucent zirconia: an in vitro study. Int J Dent 2022;2022:9884006. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9884006
  4. Papageorgiou-Kyrana K, Fasoula M, Kontonasaki E. Translucency of monolithic zirconia after hydrothermal aging: a review of in vitro studies. J Prosthodont 2020;29:489-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13174
  5. Elsaka SE. Optical and mechanical properties of newly developed monolithic multilayer zirconia. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e279-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12730
  6. Babaee Hemmati Y, Neshandar Asil H, Falahchai M, Safari N. Comparative effects of tungsten, diamond burs and laser for residual adhesive removal after orthodontic debonding on flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation of high-translucent zirconia: an in vitro study. Int Orthod 2022;20:100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100665
  7. Kim HK. Optical and mechanical properties of highly translucent dental zirconia. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:3395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13153395
  8. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Lassila LV. The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015;34:605-10. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-054
  9. Turgut S. Optical properties of currently used zirconia-based esthetic restorations fabricated with different techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12533
  10. Geoghegan F, Birjandi AA, Machado Xavier G, DiBiase AT. Motivation, expectations and understanding of patients and their parents seeking orthodontic treatment in specialist practice. J Orthod 2019;46:46-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312518820330
  11. Abuelenain DA, Linjawi AI, Alghamdi AS, Alsadi FM. The effect of various mechanical and chemical surface conditioning on the bonding of orthodontic brackets to all ceramic materials. J Dent Sci 2021;16:370-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.003
  12. Arif R, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. In vitro color stainability and relative translucency of CAD-CAM restorative materials used for laminate veneers and complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:160-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.011
  13. Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments and coffee thermocycling on the color and translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.024
  14. Mokhtarpur H, Nafisifard M, Dadgar S, Etemadi A, Chiniforush N, Sobouti F. Shear bond strength of the metal bracket to zirconium ceramic restoration treated by the Nd: YAG laser and other methods: an in vitro microscopic study. J Lasers Med Sci 2020;11:411-6. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.65
  15. Ameli N, Talaei R, Saeedi S, Ghorbani R, Askari BA. Effect of two polishing systems on color and surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain following orthodontic bracket debonding and composite resin removal. APOS Trends Orthod 2019;9:105-10. https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS-11-2019
  16. Cetik S, Ha TH, Sitri L, Duterme H, Pham V, Atash R. Comparison of shear strength of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets cemented to zirconia depending on surface treatment: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2019;13:150-5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694304
  17. Queiroz Tavares ML, Elias CN, Nojima LI. Effects of different primers on indirect orthodontic bonding: shear bond strength, color change, and enamel roughness. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:245-52. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.245
  18. Trakyali G, Ozdemir FI, Arun T. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:397-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp023
  19. Gorucu-Coskuner H, Atik E, Taner T. Tooth color change due to different etching and debonding procedures. Angle Orthod 2018;88:779-84. https://doi.org/10.2319/122017-872.1
  20. Ye C, Zhao Z, Zhao Q, Du X, Ye J, Wei X. Comparison of enamel discoloration associated with bonding with three different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with four different procedures. J Dent 2013;41 Suppl 5:e35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.012
  21. Zaher AR, Abdalla EM, Abdel Motie MA, Rehman NA, Kassem H, Athanasiou AE. Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems. J Orthod 2012;39:82-8. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465312512Z.0000000009
  22. Boncuk Y, Cehreli ZC, Polat-Ozsoy O. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration. Angle Orthod 2014;84:634-41. https://doi.org/10.2319/060613-433.1
  23. Kaya Y, Alkan O, Degirmenci A, Keskin S. Long-term follow-up of enamel color changes after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.032
  24. Joo HJ, Lee YK, Lee DY, Kim YJ, Lim YK. Influence of orthodontic adhesives and clean-up procedures on the stain susceptibility of enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod 2011;81:334-40. https://doi.org/10.2319/062610-350.1
  25. Moradinezhad M, Moradi M, Shamohammadi M, Hormozi E, Ghorani A. Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018;15:180-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.231860
  26. Jarvis J, Zinelis S, Eliades T, Bradley TG. Porcelain surface roughness, color and gloss changes after orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod 2006;76:274-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16539553/
  27. Herion DT, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods. Angle Orthod 2010;80:167-74. https://doi.org/10.2319/010909-19.1
  28. Garcia-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C, Mendoza-Yero O, Donate-Buendia C, Montero J, et al. Effects of femtosecond laser and other surface treatments on the bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets to zirconia. PLoS One 2017;12:e0186796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186796
  29. Jahandideh Y, Falahchai M, Pourkhalili H. Effect of surface treatment with Er:YAG and CO2 lasers on shear bond strength of polyether ether ketone to composite resin veneers. J Lasers Med Sci 2020;11:153-9. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.26
  30. Bitencourt SB, Ferreira LC, Mazza LC, Dos Santos DM, Pesqueira AA, Theodoro LH. Effect of laser irradiation on bond strength between zirconia and resin cement or veneer ceramic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2021;21:125-37. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_590_20
  31. Aljanobi G, Al-Sowygh ZH. The effect of thermocycling on the translucency and color stability of modified glass ceramic and multilayer zirconia materials. Cureus 2020;12:e6968. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6968
  32. Sigiliao LC, Marquezan M, Elias CN, Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.078-085.oar
  33. Zeighami S, Mirmohammadrezaei S, Safi M, Falahchai SM. The effect of core and veneering design on the optical properties of polyether ether ketone. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;25:201-8. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01720Zeighami08
  34. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27 Suppl 1:S1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149
  35. Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Perez MM. Translucency thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater 2018;34:1168-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.001
  36. Tuncer NI, Pamukcu H, Polat-Ozsoy O. Effects of repeated bracket bonding on enamel color changes. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:1093-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30156191/ https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_7_18
  37. Al-Zordk W, Saker S. Impact of sintering procedure and clinical adjustment on color stability and translucency of translucent zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:788.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.024
  38. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Onoral O, Aktore H, Ozan O. Does the application of surface treatments in different sintering stages affect flexural strength and optical properties of zirconia? J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12552
  39. Wang H, Xiong F, Zhenhua L. Influence of varied surface texture of dentin porcelain on optical properties of porcelain specimens. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60039-5
  40. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Ha SR. Effects of surface treatments on the translucency, opalescence, and surface texture of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:773-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.020
  41. Karan S, Toroglu MS. Porcelain refinishing with two different polishing systems after orthodontic debonding. Angle Orthod 2008;78:947-53. https://doi.org/10.2319/081307-374.1