Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제47권3호
  • /
  • Pages.375-382
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance of a novel bolt-and-welded connection of box-section beam and box-section column

  • Linfeng Lu (School of civil engineering, Chang'an University) ;
  • Songlin Ding (School of civil engineering, Chang'an University) ;
  • Yuzhou Liu (School of civil engineering, Chang'an University) ;
  • Zhaojia Chen (School of civil engineering, Chang'an University) ;
  • Zhongpeng Li (China Construction Third Bureau Group Co., Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.23
  • 심사 : 2023.04.21
  • 발행 : 2023.04.21
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The H-shaped steel beam is popular due to its ease of manufacturing and connection to the column. This profile, which is used as a shallow beam, needs the high weak-axis bending stiffness and torsional stiffness to meet the overall stability. Achieving the local beam flange stability, bearing capacity, bending stiffness, and torsional requirements need a great thickness and width of the beam flange, which causes, which will cause more uneconomical structural design. So, the box-section beam is the ideal alternative. However, the current design specifications do not have design rules for the bolt-and-welded connection of the box-section beam and box-section column. The paper proposes a novel bolt-and-welded connection of the box-section beams and box-section columns based on a high-rise structural design scheme. Three connection models, BASE, WBF, and RBS, are analyzed under cyclic loading in ABAQUS software. The failure modes, hysteresis response, bearing capacity, ductility, plastic rotation angle, energy dissipation, and stiffness degradation of all models are determined and compared. Compared with the other two models, the model WBF exhibited excellent seismic performance, ductility, and plastic rotation ability. Finally, model WBF was chosen as the connection scheme used in the project design.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank the Nature Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2018JM5063) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Cultivation of Chang'an University (300102288201) for financial support. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the sponsors' views.

참고문헌

  1. Agheshlui, H., Goldsworthy, H., Gad, E. and Mirza, O. (2017), "Anchored blind bolted composite connection to a concrete filled steel tubular column", Steel Compos. Struct., 23(1), 115-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.1.115.
  2. AISC/ANSI 341-16 (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. Ataollahi, S., Banan, M.R. and Banan, M.R. (2016), "Numerical cyclic behavior of T-RBS: A new steel moment connection", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(6), 1251-1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.6.1251.
  4. Bursi, O.S. and Jaspart, J.P. (1998), "Basic issues in the finite element simulation of extended end plate connections", Comput. Struct., 69(3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00136-9.
  5. Chi, B. and Uang, C.M. (2002), "Cyclic response and design recommendations of reduced beam section moment connections with deep columns", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 464-473. https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(464).
  6. Dehghan, S.M., Najafgholipour, M.A., Ziarati, S.M. and Mehrpour, M.R. (2018), "Experimental and numerical assessment of beamcolumn connection in steel moment-resisting frames with builtup double-I column", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(3), 315-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.3.315.
  7. Eslami1a, M. and Namba, H. (2016), "Rotation capacity of composite beam connected to RHS column, experimental test results", Steel Compos. Struct., 22(1), 141-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.1.141.
  8. FEMA-267 (1995), Interim Guidelines: Evaluation, Repair, Modification and Design of Steel Moment Frames, Report No. SAC-95-02, Washington, D.C., USA.
  9. GB50011-2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.
  10. GB50017-2017 (2017), Standard for Design of Steel Structures, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.
  11. JGJ99-2015 (2015), Specification for Steel Structure of Tall Building, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.
  12. JGJ/T101-2015(2015), Specification for Seismic Testing of Buildings, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.
  13. Lee, C.K., Chiew, S.P. and Jiang, J. (2012), "Residual stress study of welded high strength steel thin-walled plate-to-plate joints, Part 1: Experimental study", Thin Wall. Struct., 56, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.03.015.
  14. Lu, L.F., Xu, Y.L. and Lim, J.B.P. (2018), "Mechanical performance of a new I-section weak-axis column bending connection", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(1), 31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.1.031.
  15. Nunez, E., Torres, R. and Herrera, R. (2017), "Seismic performance of moment connections in steel moment frames with HSS columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 25(3), 271-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.3.271.
  16. Shim, H.J., Lee, E.T., Kim, S.B. and Kim, S.S. (2014), "Development and performance evaluation of weak-axis column bending connections for advanced constructability", Int. J. Steel Struct., 14(2), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-2016-y.
  17. Tsai, C.Y., Tsai, K.C., Li, C.H., Wu, C.C., Lin, K.C. and Jhuang, S.J. (2020), "Seismic fracture evaluation of diaphragm joints in welded beam-to-box column moment connections", Earthq. Engng. Struct. Dyn., 49(13), 1344-1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3293.
  18. Xu, Y.L., Lu, L.F. and Zheng, H. (2019), "Finite element analysis of weak‑axis composite connections under cyclic loading", Int. J. Steel Struct., 19(1), 82-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0091-1.
  19. Yamaguchi, E., Oshima, N. and Fujiwara, Y. (2009), "Reinforcement of box-section beam-to-column connection in steel bridge pier", Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures and Progress in Structural Stability and Dynamics, Hong Kong, China, December.
  20. Yuan, J.X. (2008), Analysis of Testing Method and Boundry Condition of Beam-to-Column Joint Behavior in Frame, Ph.D. Dissertation, Shantou University.
  21. 16G519 (2016), Construction Details of Steel Structure Joints of Multi-Storey and High-Rise Civil Buildings, China Plan Press, Beijing, China.