DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a simplified drilling protocol at 50 rpm on heat generation under water-free conditions: an in vitro study

  • Hyeon-Ji Jang (Department of Periodontology, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jin-Un Yoon (Department of Periodontology, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ji-Young Joo (Department of Periodontology, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ju-Youn Lee (Department of Periodontology, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hyun-Joo Kim (Department of Periodontology, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2022.03.08
  • Accepted : 2022.06.02
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, guided implant surgery has been widely used for the convenience of patients and surgeons. Further streamlining the surgical procedure would make implant surgery more convenient. Low-speed water-free conditions are often used in guided implant surgery. Therefore, in this study, we attempted to confirm once again whether drilling was safe at a low speed without water. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a simplified drilling protocol that omits some intermediate steps in the drilling process was safe from the viewpoint of heat generation. Methods: D1 density artificial bone blocks were drilled under 50 rpm, 10 N·cm water-free conditions, and the surface temperature was measured using a digital infrared camera. First, drilling was performed with the sequential drilling method, which is the most widely used technique. Second, for each drill diameter, the temperature change was measured while performing simplified drilling with omission of the previous 1, 2, or 3 steps. Results: In sequential drilling, the heat generated during drilling at all diameters was less than the critical temperature of osteonecrosis (47℃) except for the ⌀2 drill. Statistical significance was observed in all groups when comparing sequential and simplified drilling in the ⌀3.2, ⌀3.8, and ⌀4.3 drills (P<0.001). However, in the simplified drilling procedures, the temperature was below the osteonecrosis threshold temperature (47℃) except for the ⌀4.3 drill with the omission of the previous 3 steps (⌀3.0, ⌀3.2, and ⌀3.8). Conclusions: In general, drilling under low-speed, water-free conditions has shown stable results in terms of heat generation. Simplified drilling showed statistically significantly greater heat generation than sequential drilling. However, most of the diameters and omitted steps seem to be clinically acceptable, so it will be useful if an appropriate selection is made according to the patient's clinical condition.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; Daejeon, Republic of Korea) funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (grant No. NRF-2021R1G1A1004716).

References

  1. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:377-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023
  2. Tey VH, Phillips R, Tan K. Patient-related outcome measures with implant therapy after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:683-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12862
  3. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-43. 
  4. Mainetti T, Lang NP, Bengazi F, Sbricoli L, Soto Cantero L, Botticelli D. Immediate loading of implants installed in a healed alveolar bony ridge or immediately after tooth extraction: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:435-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12389
  5. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Flapless versus conventional flapped dental implant surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e100624.
  6. Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G, Reinert S. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:609-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01153.x
  7. Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Schneider M, Reinert S. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:382-6.
  8. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  9. Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:127-36.
  10. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9
  11. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:705-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90417-8
  12. Eriksson A, Albrektsson T, Grane B, McQueen D. Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:115-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80020-3
  13. Oliveira N, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferres-Padro E, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Thermal changes and drill wear in bovine bone during implant site preparation. A comparative in vitro study: twisted stainless steel and ceramic drills. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:963-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02248.x
  14. Scarano A, Piattelli A, Assenza B, Carinci F, Di Donato L, Romani GL, et al. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with cylindrical versus conical drills. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011;13:319-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00209.x
  15. Benington IC, Biagioni PA, Briggs J, Sheridan S, Lamey PJ. Thermal changes observed at implant sites during internal and external irrigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:293-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130309.x
  16. Mohlhenrich SC, Abouridouane M, Heussen N, Modabber A, Klocke F, Holzle F. Influence of bone density and implant drill diameter on the resulting axial force and temperature development in implant burs and artificial bone: an in vitro study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:135-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0536-z
  17. Frosch L, Mukaddam K, Filippi A, Zitzmann NU, Kuhl S. Comparison of heat generation between guided and conventional implant surgery for single and sequential drilling protocols: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:121-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13398
  18. Gaspar J, Borrecho G, Oliveira P, Salvado F, Martins dos Santos J. Osteotomy at low-speed drilling without irrigation versus high-speed drilling with irrigation: an experimental study. Acta Med Port 2013;26:231-6.
  19. Waltenberger L, Wied S, Wolfart S, Tuna T. Effect of different dental implant drilling template designs on heat generation during osteotomy: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022;33:53-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13864
  20. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1160-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.34992
  21. Kim SJ, Yoo J, Kim YS, Shin SW. Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:522-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000500016
  22. Salomo-Coll O, Auriol-Muerza B, Lozano-Carrascal N, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Wang HL, Gargallo-Albiol J. Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:1047-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03398-y
  23. Anitua E, Carda C, Andia I. A novel drilling procedure and subsequent bone autograft preparation: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:138-45.
  24. Eriksson RA, Adell R. Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:4-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90006-6
  25. Bulloch SE, Olsen RG, Bulloch B. Comparison of heat generation between internally guided (cannulated) single drill and traditional sequential drilling with and without a drill guide for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1456-60.
  26. Jimbo R, Giro G, Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Tovar N, et al. Simplified drilling technique does not decrease dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report. J Periodontol 2013;84:1599-605. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120565
  27. Oh JH, Fang Y, Jeong SM, Choi BH. The effect of low-speed drilling without irrigation on heat generation: an experimental study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;42:9-12. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.1.9
  28. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z. Heat generation during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:186-93.
  29. Strbac GD, Giannis K, Unger E, Mittlbock M, Watzek G, Zechner W. A novel standardized bone model for thermal evaluation of bone osteotomies with various irrigation methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:622-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12090
  30. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T, Magnusson B. Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:261-8.
  31. Mohlhenrich SC, Abouridouane M, Heussen N, Holzle F, Klocke F, Modabber A. Thermal evaluation by infrared measurement of implant site preparation between single and gradual drilling in artificial bone blocks of different densities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1478-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.020
  32. Jimbo R, Janal MN, Marin C, Giro G, Tovar N, Coelho PG. The effect of implant diameter on osseointegration utilizing simplified drilling protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1295-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12268
  33. Delgado-Ruiz RA, Velasco Ortega E, Romanos GE, Gerhke S, Newen I, Calvo-Guirado JL. Slow drilling speeds for single-drill implant bed preparation. Experimental in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:349-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2119-x