INTRODUCTION
Melanin is a pigment produced by epidermal melanocytes and is responsible for skin color and protection from UV rays.1 However the excessive production of melanin pigments resulted in different dermatological disorders such as skin aging spots, melasma, freckles, lentigo, ephelides and melanoma.2 Studies have shown that these physiological disturbances are primarily ascribed to the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or oxidative stress ultimately leading to hyperpigmentation.3
Tyrosinase, a binuclear copper containing monooxygenase, is a critical rate-limiting enzyme involved in melanin biosynthesis in the skin epidermis. Melanogenesis is initiated by the hydroxylation of L-tyrosine to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), which is catalyzed by tyrosinase. Tyrosinase is also participated in the subsequent enzymatic conversion of DOPA to DOPA quinone.4 Thus, tyrosinase inhibitors are major targets in the development of anti-melanogenesis materials.1
ROS, which induce oxidative stress, are important molecules involved in skin aging process. ROS has been reported as key molecules that cause pigmentation because they can increase secretion of α melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) in keratinocytes.5 α-MSH binds to melanocortin 1 receptor on melanocytes and stimulates the expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathway, which leads to melanogenesis.6 Therefore, anti-oxidants such as ROS scavengers may suppress melanogenesis in the epidermis.
Sorbus alnifolia (Sieb. Et Zucc.) K. Koch is a deciduous broad-leaved tree of the dicotyledonous plant Rosaceae, mainly inhabiting the shaded and rock-broken areas of dry ridges or plains from deep mountains to 100-1300 m highlands. The leaves with a length of 5-10 cm are staggered on the branches. This plant is mainly distributed in Korea, China and Japan. According to studies, Sorbus L. plant is recommended in ethnomedicine for respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases as well as for rheumatism, cancer and diabetes.7 But until now, the researches on the efficacy and chemical constituents of S. alnifolia extract have not been reported.
Therefore, we used extracts as well as solvent fractions of S. alnifolia branches as research materials to evaluate their melanogenesis inhibitory properties including anti-oxidant capacities. Meanwhile, the ethyl acetate fraction was systematically partitioned, and the chemical structures of the purified isolates were elucidated.
EXPERIMENTAL
General Experimental Procedures
1D NMR spectra were performed on JNM-EXC 400 (FT-NMR system, 400 MHz, JEOL Co.) using pyridine-d5, CD3OD as solvent for measurement. The chemical shift values are reported in ppm relative to the solvent used. HR-ESI-MS analysis was performed on an ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and Vion IMS QTOF (Waters MS Technologies, Manchester, UK) system using an Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The ESI-MS spectra were acquired in the negative mode to produce [M-H]- ions. Merck® silica gel 60 (KGaA, Germany) and SephadexTM LH-20 (GE healthcare Co, Sweden) were used for column chromatography, and precoated silica gel 60 F-254 plates (Merck LTD., Germany) were used for thin-layer chromatography (TLC). UV spectra were recorded on a Biochrom Libra S22 spectrophotometer. The spots on TLC were detected by spraying with 3% KMnO4 aqueous solution or anisaldehyde solution with 5% H2SO4. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and [2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] (ABTS) were purchased from Aldrich. All solvents used were of analytical grade.
Plant Material
The S. alnifolia branches were collected Gwangpyeongri, Seogwipo city, Korea in May 2022. Voucher specimen (No. 502) was deposited at Natural Product Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry and Cosmetics, Jeju National University.
Extraction and Isolation
The S. alnifolia branches (820.0 g) were extracted two times with 70% aqueous ethanol (16.4 L) under stirring for 24 h at room temperature. The extracted solution was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure and freeze dried to afford a tan powder (70.7 g). A portion of the extract (56.2 g) was suspended in water (5.0 L) and fractionated into n-hexane (Hex, 4.8 g), ethyl acetate (EtOAc, 10.7 g), n-butanol (16.2 g) and water (H2O, 24.0 g) fractions. The EtOAc soluble fraction (5.0 g) was subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) over silica gel using step gradient solvents (n-Hex-EtOAc-methanol, 300 mL each) to give 32 fractions (Fr. V1-V32). A Fr. V12 (123.7 mg) was subjected by silica gel column chromatography with chloroform-methanol (30:1) eluents to yield compound 1 (18.4 mg). After, Fr. V15-16 (120.7 mg) was subjected by silica gel column chromatography with chloroform-methanol (25:1) eluents to yield compound 2 (12.6 mg). A Fr. V18 (240.7 mg) was further purified using Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography with chloroform-methanol (7:1) eluents to yield compound 3 (45.9 mg). A Fr. V25 (520.4 mg) was further purified using Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography with chloroformmethanol (5:2) eluents to afford compound 3 (23.4 mg) and 4 (15.2 mg).
Anti-melanogenesis Activities
Cell Culture
The murine melanoma cell line B16F10 was purchased from America Type Cell Culture (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). B16F10 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were maintained at 37 ℃ in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Cell Viability Assay
The cell viability after treatment with tested samples was determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenylt-etrazolium bromide (MTT). 2 × 104 cells were added in each well of 24-well plate. After 24 h, cells were exposed to sample at several concentrations for 72 h. MTT reagent (500 μg/mL) was added to the medium, and which was allowed to stand for 4 h. After removing the supernatant, the formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO. Absorbance of each well was read at 570 nm using a plate reader.
Determination of Melanin Content
The B16F10 cells were seeded at density of 2 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plate and were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS. After 24 h, the cells were treated with 100 nM α-MSH and various concentrations of the samples or with the medium only as a blank. After 72 h incubation at 37 ℃ with 5% CO2, the cells were washed with PBS and harvested (5000 rpm × 10 min). Then, cell pellets were completely lysed with 1 N NaOH at 55 ℃. The melanin content of the cell lysates was determined by measuring the absorbance at 405 nm with a microplate reader. Melasolv (20 μM) served as a positive control. Data are expressed in terms of melanin synthesis inhibitory activity compared to the blank.
Intracellular Tyrosinase Activity Assay
Intracellular tyrosinase activity was determined based on a modification of a previously described method. 2 × 104 cells/well were treated with 100 nM α-MSH and samples. After 72 h, the incubated cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and harvested by centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 5 min. The harvested cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. The total protein was collected by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 ℃. The reaction mixture consisted of 160 μL 8 mM L-DOPA to dissolve in 67 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) solution and 20 μL cell-extracted protein in 96-well plate. After 1 h at 37 ℃, it was measured based on the absorbance at a wavelength of 490 nm using a microplate reader.
Anti-oxidative Activities
Determination of Total Polyphenols Content
The determination of the total polyphenol content was applied to Folin-Deinis method,8 900 μL distilled water and 100 μL Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol regent were added to each sample solution of 100 μL, and reacted at room temperature for 3 min. Then addition of 200 μL 7% (w/v) Na2-CO3 solution and 700 μL distilled water, were followed by reaction at room temperature for 1 h, and measurement was conducted at the absorbance at 700 nm. After making calibration curve with different concentrations with the standard gallic acid, the total polyphenol content was calculated.
Determination of Total Flavonoid Content
The determination of the total flavonoid content was applied to Park method,9 100 μL of each sample solution was diluted with 300 μL 95% EtOH. Then addition of 20 μL of 10% (w/v) Al(NO3)3 solution and 20 μL of 1 M CH3COONa solution and distilled water were made until the total volume reaches to 1 mL. After the mixtures were reacted at room temperature for 30 min, 200 μL of the reaction solution was taken in each 96-well plate, and measured the absorbance at 415 nm. After making calibration curve with different concentrations with the standard quercetin, the total flavonoid content was calculated.
DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity experiment was applied to Blois method.10 20 μL sample solutions with different concentrations was mixed to 180 μL 0.2 mM DPPH solution in a 96-well plate, and the mixtures were reacted at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance was measured at 515 nm. The concentration (SC50) when the scavenging activity percentage of each sample was 50% was calculated, and BHT was used as the positive control.
ABTS+ Radical Scavenging Assay
2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonicacid) (ABTS) cationic free radical scavenging activity was measured by using the method of Re et al.11 Mixture of 7.4 mM ABTS and 2.6 mM potassium persulfate was stored for 16 h at rt in the dark to form ABTS+ free radicals. The ABTS+ solution was diluted with ethanol so that its absorbance at 700 nm was 0.78 ± 0.02. 20 μL sample solutions with different concentrations was added to 180 μL ABTS+ solution in a 96-well plate. The mixture was reacted at rt for 15 min, and measured the absorbance at 700 nm. The concentration (SC50) was calculated. BHT was used as the positive control.
Cell Protective Effects
Cell Culture
The immortalized human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT was purchased from ATCC. HaCaT cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 10% heat-inactivated FBS. Cells were maintained at 37 ℃ in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Cell Viability Assay
The viability of HaCaT cells was measured by the MTT assay. The cells were plated in a 96-well cell culture plate at a density of 1 ×104 cells/well and allowed to attach for 24 h then the culture medium was removed. After samples were treated separately on medium without FBS, and after 24 h of culture, MTT with a concentration of 500 μg/mL was added, reacted at 37 ℃ for 4 h, and the MTT solution was removed. Finally, DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan precipitate produced by the reaction with living cells, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm to calculate the cell survival rate (%).
Cell Protective Effect by Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)-induced Cell Damage
The cells were plated in a 96-well cell culture plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and after incubation at 37 ℃ and 5% CO2 for 24 h, then culture medium was removed. After incubation with hydrogen peroxide at a concentration determined by cell toxicity assessment for 20 min, the H2O2 was removed and washed twice with Dubecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). The treated samples were diluted according to the concentration in the medium without FBS, and after 24 h of culture, the cell viability (%) was calculated by MTT assay to verify the protective effects of cells on H2O2-induced cell damage.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The branches of S. alnifolia were extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol, and the extract was suspended in water and partitioned successively into n-hexane (n-Hex), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and n-butanol (n-BuOH) to afford the respective fractions. In order to evaluate whitening effects of the 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches, we examined melanogenesis inhibitory activity and cytotoxicity using α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 melanoma cells. As shown in Fig. 1, extract and each fraction showed considerable anti-melanogenesis activities. However, cell toxicities were observed at the concentration of 100 μg/mL for the extract, n-Hex and EtOAc fractions. On the other hand, no toxicity was appeared for the n-BuOH fraction at 100 μg/mL. In the case of extracts, melanin contents were decreased in a dose-dependent manner without causing cytotoxicity within a concentration range from 20 to 50 μg/mL (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the melanin contents and toxicity data with varying concentration (12.5-100 μg/mL) were presented for the n-BuOH fraction in Fig. 2B. Decrease of melanin contents was identified in a dose-dependent manner in this fraction.
Figure 1. Effects of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches on melanin contents and cell viability in α-MSH induced B16F10 cells. The cells were stimulated with 100 nM of α-MSH only, or with α-MSH plus fractions from S. alnifolia branches and melasolv (positive control, 20 µM) for 72 h. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Effects of 70% ethanol extract (A) and n-BuOH (B) fraction from S. alnifolia branches on melanin contents and cell viability in α-MSH induced B16F10 cells. The cells were stimulated with 100 nM of α-M SH only, or with α-MSH plus extract or n-BuOH fraction from S. alnifolia branches for 72 h. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Since cellular tyrosinase activity is also the major factor that leads to melanin synthesis, we examined its enzyme activity on α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 melanoma cells. The results showed that the 70% ethanol extract and n-BuOH fraction of S. alnifolia significantly reduced the intracellular tyrosinase activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Intracellular tyrosinase activity of 70% ethanol extract (A) and n-BuOH (B) fraction from S. alnifolia branches in α-MSH induced B16F10 cells. The cells were stimulated with 100 nM of α-MSH only, or with α-MSH plus extract or n-BuOH fraction from S. alnifolia branches for 72 h. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments (**p < 0.01).
Research on anti-oxidative activities was followed for the 70% ethanol extracts and fractions of S. alnifolia branches. First of all, the content of total phenol was determined based on calibration curve of gallic acid. The measured value is expressed by converting into the amount of gallic acid (GAE, gallic acid equivalent) contained in the sample per gram. In this experiment, higher polyphenol contents were observed in n-BuOH and EtOAc fractions with 241.1 ± 1.1 and 222.9 ± 2.4 mg/g GAE values respectively (Fig. 4A). The content of total flavonoid was also determined by using quercetin as a standard material. The measurement is expressed by converting into the amount of quercetin in each gram of the sample (QE; quercetin equivalent). The highest content of flavonoid was observed in EtOAc fraction showing 75.3 ± 2.0 mg/g QE (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4. Total polyphenol contents (A) and total flavonoid contents (B) of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments.
DPPH is a relatively stable hydrazyl free radical compound, which reacts with antioxidant substrates to be converted into neutral hydrazin substance accompanied by discoloration of its solution. As a measure of free radical scavenging activities of plant extracts, tracking the change in UV absorbance of DPPH solutions has been very efficiently utilized. The use of ABTS+ is another effective measure on antioxidant capacity study, in which the color of ABTS+ radicals in situ generated was tracked by UV spectrometer. In terms of radical scavenging capacity assay, the results of ABTS+ is known to correlate significantly with those of DPPH radical.12
In the DPPH radical scavenging activity test for the 70% ethanol extract and fractions of S. alnifolia (Table 1), higher activities were observed in EtOAc and n-BuOH fractions with SC50 values of 26.4 and 38.1 μg/mL respectively, showing better activity than the positive control BHT (SC50 44.0 μg/mL). In addition, the EtOAc and n-BuOH fractions showed the scavenging activity using ABTS+ radicals with SC50 values of 34.5 and 40.9 μg/mL respectively, which are comparable free radical scavenging activities to the control group (Table 1).
Table 1. SC50 values of DPPH and ABTS+ radical scavenging activities of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches.
SC50: scavenging concentration for 50% of radical
BHT: positive control
In the following experiment, the tissue protection effect of S. alnifolia for the cells damaged by hydrogen peroxide. It is typical ROS, which cause oxidative damage leading to skin aging.
In order to conduct the cell protective effect of the 70% ethanol extract, first of all, its appropriate concentration without affecting cytotoxicity was calculated with HaCaT keratinocytes. When all samples were treated with 5 and 10 μg/mL, the cell survival rate was above 90% based on MTT assay. Therefore, the concentration of the samples used in this experiment was reasonably set below 10 μg/mL (Fig. 5).
Figure 5. Cell viability of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches in HaCaT cells. HaCaT cells were treated with different concentration of samples, and then cell toxicity was determined by MTT assay. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments.
Subsequently, H2O2-induced cell toxicity was investigated. HaCaT cells were treated with different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mM) of H2O2, and the cell viability was observed. Compared with the untreated control, when treated with 6 mM H2O2, the cell survival rate was 59.8%, which was used as a control group in this experiment (Fig. 6A). When EtOAc and n-BuOH fractions of S. alnifolia were treated with oxidatively damaged HaCaT cells (59.8% viability), they showed cell protective effects. For example, the EtOAc fractions of 5 and 10 μg/mL concentration were used, the cell viabilities were increased from 59.8% to 65.6% and 77.3% respectively. Similarly, n-BuOH fractions of 5 and 10 μg/mL concentration were treated, the cell survival rates were improved to 66.6% and 76.5% respectively (Fig. 6).
Figure 6. (A) Cell viability on H2O2-inducted cell damage in HaCaT cells. (B) Cell protective effects of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches on HaCaT cells damaged by H2O2. HaCaT cells were treated with different concentration of sample for 24 h after being exposed to oxidative stress. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Phytochemical study was conducted to identify the active ingredient from the 70% ethanol extracts. Four phytochemicals were isolated from the ethyl acetate fraction of S. alnifolia branches by repeated column chromatography. The structures of the isolates were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR and ESI-MS spectra. Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow amorphous powder. ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 485.3263 [M-H]- (calcd for C30H45O5, 485.3272) corresponding to the formula C30H46O5, agreed with its 1H and 13C-NMR data, and is presumed to be the triterpenoid. The NMR spectra and the comparison with the literature13 were determined to be 2-oxopomolic acid. Compound 2 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 487.3431 [M-H]-, (calcd for C30H47O5, m/z 487.3429). The NMR spectra signal of compound 2 was compared with that of compound 1 and found to be similar triterpene compound. Compared with the literature,14 it was determined to be euscaphic acid. Compound 3 was obtained as a brown amorphous powder. ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 289.0726 [M-H]-, (calcd for C15H13O6, m/z 289.0718). Further comparison with the literature15 determined it to be epi-catechin. Compound 4 was obtained as a brown amorphous powder. ESI-MS showed a quasimolecular ion peak at m/z 294.0975 [M-H]-, (calcd for C14H16NO6, m/z 294.0983), corresponding to the formula C14H17NO6, agreed with its 1H and 13C-NMR data. It was a cyanogenic glycoside compound, which was confirmed to be prunasin by further comparison with the literature.16 All of these compounds 1-4 were isolated for the first time from S. alnifolia (Fig. 7).
Figure 7. Isolated compounds 1-4 from S. alnifolia branches.
This study showed that S. alnifolia branches extracts possess excellent whitening activities. Previous reports have described that triterpenoids 2-oxopomolic acid (1) and euscaphic acid (2) have potent melanogenesis inhibitory activities.17 Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that isolates 1 and 2 are the key components for the whitening efficacy of S. alnifolia extracts. In addition, the potent DPPH and ABTS+ radical scavenging activity as well as cell protective effect of the isolated flavan-3-ol compound, epi-catechin (3), has been widely reported.18-20 In this study, compound 3 can be considered as the main component responsible for the anti-oxidant effects of the plant extracts.
CONCLUSION
This study described the whitening and anti-oxidative activity of 70% ethanol extract and solvent fractions from S. alnifolia branches. In the melanogenesis inhibitory activities using α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 melanoma cells, 70% ethanol extract and n-BuOH fraction showed strong inhibitory activities on melanin synthesis and intracellular tyrosinase production in a dose-dependent manner. Also, anti-oxidative tests revealed that the EtOAc and n-BuOH fractions showed potent radical scavenging activities of DPPH and ABTS+ radicals. Moreover, for the cell protective effect studies using HaCaT keratinocytes damaged by H2O2, the EtOAc and n-BuOH fractions showed a very positive results on prevention of oxidative stress. In order to identify the active ingredients, the EtOAc fraction purified by VLC followed by column chromatography to isolate four compounds; 2-oxopomolic acid (1), euscaphic acid (2), epi-catechin (3), prunasin (4). These compounds were isolated for the first time from S. alnifolia. Among them, 2-oxopomolic acid (1) and euscaphic acid (2) are considered as the active whitening constituents, and epicatechin (3) is an extensively-studied anti-oxidative component. Therefore, the extract of S. alnifolia branches could be used as whitening and anti-oxidative ingredients in the fields of cosmetic industries.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the 2022 scientific promotion program funded by Jeju National University.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information (NMR and HR-ESI-MS data for the compounds 1-4) is available in the online version of this article.
References
- Huang, H. C.; Hsieh, W. Y.; Niu, Y. L.; Chang, T. M. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 16665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150916665
- Haldys, K.; Goldeman, W.; Jewginski, M.; Wolinska, E.; Anger, N.; Rossowska, J.; Latajka, R. Bioorg Chem. 2018, 81, 577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.09.003
- El-Din, M. I. G.; Youssef, F. S.; Ashour, M. L.; Eldahshan, O. A.; Singab, A. N. B. Food funct. 2020, 11, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FO02800E
- Jung, H. J.; Choi, D. C.; Noh, S. G.; Choi, H.; Choi, I.; Ryu, I. Y.; Chung, H. Y.; Moon, H. R. Antioxidants. 2021, 10, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071078
- Park, S. H.; Choi, E.; Kim, S.; Kim, D. S.; Kim, J. H.; Chang, S. G.; Choi, J. S.; Park, K. J.; Roh, K.-B.; Lee, J. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092825
- Aoki, H.; Moro, O. Life Sci. 2002, 71, 2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(02)01996-3
- Soltys, A.; Galanty, A.; Podolak, I. Phytochem Rev. 2020, 19, 491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-020-09674-9
- Gutfinger, T. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 1981, 58, 966. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02659771
- Park, Y. K.; Koo, M. H.; Ikegaki, M.; Contado, J. O. S. E. Arq. Biol. Tecnol. 1997, 97.
- Blois, M. S. Nature. 1958, 181, 1199. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
- Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
- Park, S. H.; Kim, J. E.; Yeum, H. S.; Lee, N. H. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea. 2016, 42, 321.
- Zhang, X.; Jiang, D.; Wang, J.; Yang, W. Q.; Cong, S. U.; Zhu, Z. X.; Shi, S. P.; Peng-Fei, T. U. Chin. Pharm. J. 2016, 3, 203.
- Chen, J.; Li, W. L.; Wu, J. L.; Ren, B. R.; Zhang, H. Q. Pharmazie. 2008, 63, 765.
- Lee, S. J.; Master's Thesis Dissertation, Jeju National Univ., Jeju, Korea 2018.
- Hong, H. J.; Master's Thesis Dissertation, Jeju National Univ., Jeju, Korea 2019.
- Song, N. Y.; Cho, J. G.; Im, D.; Lee, D. Y.; Wu, Q.; Seo, W. D.; Kang, H. C.; Lee, Y. H.; Baek, N. I. Nat Prod Res. 2013, 27, 2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2013.805330
- Moon, M. Y.; Baik, J. S.; Kim, S. S.; Jang, W. J.; Kim, M. S.; Lee, N. H. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea. 2009, 35, 251.
- Jo, S. M.; Kim, J. E.; Lee, N. H. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea. 2022, 48, 123.
- Kim, M. A. Master's Thesis Dissertation, Jeju National Univ., Jeju, Korea 2022.