DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavioral responses to cow and calf separation: separation at 1 and 100 days after birth

  • Sarah E. Mac (Livestock Production and Welfare Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney) ;
  • Sabrina Lomax (Livestock Production and Welfare Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney) ;
  • Cameron E. F. Clark (Livestock Production and Welfare Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney)
  • Received : 2022.06.29
  • Accepted : 2022.09.16
  • Published : 2023.05.01

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to compare the behavioral response to full separation of cows and calves maintained together for 100 days or 24 h. Methods: Twelve Holstein-Friesian cow-calf pairs were enrolled into either treatment or industry groups (n = 6 cow-calf pairs/group). The treatment cows and calves were maintained on pasture together for 106±8.6 d and temporarily separated twice a day for milking. The Industry cows and their calves, were separated within 24 h postpartum. Triaxial accelerometer neck-mounted sensors were fitted to cows 3 weeks before separation to measure hourly rumination and activity. Before separation, cow and calf behavior was observed by scan sampling for 15 min. During the separation process, frequency of vocalizations and turn arounds were recorded. At separation, cows were moved to an observation pen where behavior was recorded for 3 d. A CCTV camera was used to record video footage of cows within the observation pens and behavior was documented from the videos in 15 min intervals across the 3 d. Results: Before separation, industry calves were more likely to be near their mother than Treatment calves. During the separation process, vocalization and turn around behavior was similar between groups. After full separation, treatment cows vocalized three times more than industry cows. However, the frequency of time spent close to barrier, standing, lying, walking, and eating were similar between industry and treatment cows. Treatment cows had greater rumination duration, and were more active, than industry cows. Conclusion: These findings suggest a similar behavioral response to full calf separation and greater occurrence of vocalizations, from cows maintained in a long-term, pasture-based, cow-calf rearing system when ompared to cows separated within 24 h. However, further work is required to assess the impact of full separation on calf behavior.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank Lara Sirovica, Daniel Weary, and Marina Von Keyserlingk from the University of British Columbia for their contribution to our work. Dairy Australia for their funding and support, Andrew Carlyon for technical support, Kehinde Oluboyede, Keegan Byrnes, Linda Buckley, Hugh Courts, and Adam Le Breton (Corstorphine Dairy, USYD, Australia) for enabling this work on farm. We also thank Dr. Evelyn Hall (USYD, Australia) for her statistical advice.

References

  1. Phipps AJ, Beggs DS, Murray AJ, Mansell PD, Pyman MF. A survey of northern Victorian dairy farmers to investigate dairy calf management: calf-rearing practices. Aust Vet J 2018;96:107-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12686 
  2. Meagher RK, Beaver A, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of prolonged cow-calf contact on behavior, welfare, and productivity. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:5765-83. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16021 
  3. Roadknight N, Wales W, Jongman E, Mansell P, Hepworth G, Fisher A. Does the duration of repeated temporary separation affect welfare in dairy cow-calf contact systems? Appl Anim Behav Sci 2022;249:105592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105592 
  4. Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Wittman H, Weary DM. What difference does a visit make? Changes in animal welfare perceptions after interested citizens tour a dairy farm. PLOS ONE 2016;11:e0154733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154733 
  5. Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Schuppli CA, Weary DM. Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: The case of early cow-calf separation. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:6105-16. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6040 
  6. Hotzel MJ, Cardoso CS, Roslindo A, von Keyserlingk MAG. Citizens' views on the practices of zero-grazing and cowcalf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability? J Dairy Sci 2017;100:4150-60. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11933 
  7. Flower FC, Weary DM. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf:: 2. Separation at 1 day and 2 weeks after birth. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;70:275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00164-7 
  8. Grondahl AM, Skancke EM, Mejdell CM, Jansen JH. Growth rate, health and welfare in a dairy herd with natural suckling until 6-8 weeks of age: a case report. Acta Vet Scand 2007;49:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-49-16 
  9. Valnickova B, Stehulova I, Sarova R, Spinka M. The effect of age at separation from the dam and presence of social companions on play behavior and weight gain in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:5545-56. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9109 
  10. Weary DM, Chua B. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf: 1. Separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after birth. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000;69:177-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00128-3 
  11. de Passille AM, Marnet PG, Lapierre H, Rushen J. Effects of twice-daily nursing on milk ejection and milk yield during nursing and milking in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008;91:1416-22. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0504 
  12. Mac SE, Lomax S, Clark CEF. Dairy cow and calf behavior and productivity when maintained together on a pasturebased system. Anim Biosci 2023;36:322-32. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0135 
  13. Asheim LJ, Johnsen JF, Havrevoll O, Mejdell CM, Grondahl AM. The economic effects of suckling and milk feeding to calves in dual purpose dairy and beef farming. Rev Agric Food Environ Stud 2016;97:225-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-016-0023-4 
  14. Beaver A, Meagher RK, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Invited review: A systematic review of the effects of early separation on dairy cow and calf health. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:5784-810. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15603 
  15. Johnsen JF, Zipp KA, Kalber T, et al. Is rearing calves with the dam a feasible option for dairy farms?-Current and future research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;181:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.011 
  16. Haley DB, Bailey DW, Stookey JM. The effects of weaning beef calves in two stages on their behavior and growth rate. J Anim Sci 2005;83:2205-14. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8392205x 
  17. Hotzel MJ, Ungerfeld R, Quintans G. Behavioural responses of 6-month-old beef calves prevented from suckling: influence of dam's milk yield. Anim Prod Sci 2010;50:909-15. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09136 
  18. Stehulova I, Valnickova B, Sarova R, Spinka M. Weaning reactions in beef cattle are adaptively adjusted to the state of the cow and the calf. J Anim Sci 2017;95:1023-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1207 
  19. von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Maternal behavior in cattle. Horm Behav 2007;52:106-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.015 
  20. Rault JL. Friends with benefits: Social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;136:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.002 
  21. Schirmann K, Chapinal N, Weary DM, Vickers L, von Keyserlingk MAG. Short communication: Rumination and feeding behavior before and after calving in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:7088-92. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7023 
  22. Hirata M, Nakagawa M, Funakoshi H, et al. Mother-young distance in Japanese Black cattle at pasture. J Ethol 2003;21: 161-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-002-0092-5 
  23. Martin P. The meaning of weaning. Anim Behav 1984;32: 1257-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80245-6 
  24. Johnsen JF, Mejdell CM, Beaver A, de Passille AM, Rushen J, Weary DM. Behavioural responses to cow-calf separation: The effect of nutritional dependence. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2018;201:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.12.009 
  25. Hudson S, Mullford M, Whittlestone WG, Payne E. Bovine plasma corticoids during parturition. J Dairy Sci 1976;59:744-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(76)84267-1 
  26. Nagel C, Trenk L, Aurich C, et al. Sympathoadrenal balance and physiological stress response in cattle at spontaneous and PGF2α-induced calving. Theriogenology 2016;85:979-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.009 
  27. Varner MA, Johnson BH, Britt JH, McDaniel BT, Mochrie RD. Influence of herd relocation upon production and endocrine traits of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1983;66:466-74. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81815-3 
  28. Pence KJ. The effects of dietary forage, social hierarchy, and stocking density on stress in lactating cows during relocation. Blacksburg, VA, USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2005. 
  29. Perez-Torres L, Orihuela A, Corro M, Rubio I, Alonso MA, Galina CS. Effects of separation time on behavioral and physiological characteristics of Brahman cows and their calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;179:17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2016.03.010 
  30. Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, et al. Human-animal interactions at abattoirs: Relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;135:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.09.007 
  31. Meen GH, Schellekens MA, Slegers MHM, Leenders NLG, van Erp-van der Kooij E, Noldus LPJJ. Sound analysis in dairy cattle vocalisation as a potential welfare monitor. Comput Electron Agric 2015;118:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.028 
  32. Johnsen JF, de Passille AM, Mejdell CM, et al. The effect of nursing on the cow-calf bond. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2015; 163:50-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.003 
  33. Ungerfeld R, Quintans G, Enriquez DH, Hrotzel MJ. Behavioural changes at weaning in 6-month-old beef calves reared by cows of high or low milk yield. Anim Prod Sci 2009;49:637-42. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09037 
  34. Adin G, Solomon R, Nikbachat M, et al. Effect of feeding cows in early lactation with diets differing in roughage-neutral detergent fiber content on intake behavior, rumination, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:3364-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2078 
  35. Soriani N, Trevisi E, Calamari L. Relationships between rumination time, metabolic conditions, and health status in dairy cows during the transition period. J Anim Sci 2012;90:4544-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-5064 
  36. Pahl C, Hartung E, Grothmann A, Mahlkow-Nerge K, Haeussermann A. Rumination activity of dairy cows in the 24 hours before and after calving. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:6935-41. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8194 
  37. Phillips CJC. Cattle behaviour and welfare, 2nd ed. edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2002. 
  38. Mattiello S, Battini M, De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Dwyer C. How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants? Animals 2019;9:758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100758 
  39. Bristow DJ, Holmes DS. Cortisol levels and anxiety-related behaviors in cattle. Physiol Behav 2007;90:626-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.015 
  40. Marchesini G, Mottaran D, Contiero B, et al. Use of rumination and activity data as health status and performance indicators in beef cattle during the early fattening period. Vet J 2018;231:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.11.013 
  41. Fregonesi JA, Leaver JD. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems. Livest Prod Sci 2002;78:245-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0 
  42. Norring M, Valros A, Munksgaard L. Milk yield affects time budget of dairy cows in tie-stalls. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:102-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3458 
  43. Lidfors LM. Behavioural effects of separating the dairy calf immediately or 4 days post-partum. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1996;49:269-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)01053-2 
  44. Grandin T. Review: Reducing handling stress improves both productivity and welfare. Prof Anim Sci 1998;14:1-10. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31783-6