Abstract
This study aimed to design an evaluation system applicable to permanent record management institutions, focusing on the Seoul Archives, in order to implement the reevaluation of permanent record management institutions. As a process for this, an area for evaluating evidence, administrative, and historical values was established and detailed evaluation factors were derived. In order to effectively apply the set evaluation factors, the evaluation procedure was designed by dividing them into three stages. In the first stage of law-based evaluation, long-term preservation was determined by identifying the position and legal form of policymakers that can be immediately evaluated according to clear standards. Records that have not been determined for long-term preservation were reorganized into evaluation factors, such as record management standards, official document classification tables, pledges, and policies, which are the second stage of business function-based evaluation, and then comprehensively applied to review the validity of long-term preservation of held records. In the second stage of evaluation, records that were not judged as long-term preservation were judged by applying historical events, cultural assets, and collection policies in the subject-based evaluation stage, which is the third stage of evaluation. The designed evaluation system can find significance in minimizing the arbitrariness reflected in the evaluation and increasing the efficiency of the evaluation, and it has been confirmed that it is possible to evaluate comprehensively reflecting the various contexts and values of the records. In addition, a re-evaluation system suitable for permanent records management institutions was established by combining balanced macro-evaluation and micro-evaluation.
본 연구는 영구기록물관리기관의 재평가 이행을 위해 서울기록원을 중심으로 영구기록물관리기관에 적용 가능한 평가체계 설계를 목표로 하였다. 이를 위한 과정으로 증거적·행정적·역사적 가치를 평가하기 위한 영역을 설정하고 세부평가요소들을 도출하였다. 설정된 평가요소들을 효과적으로 적용하기 위해 3개 단계로 구분하여 평가절차를 설계하였다. 1단계 법규기반 평가 단계에서는 분명한 기준에 의해 즉각적으로 평가할 수 있는 정책 결정권자의 직책, 법정 서식 식별 등을 통해 장기보존 여부를 판단하였다. 장기보존으로 결정되지 않은 기록물은 다시 2단계 업무기능기반 평가 단계인 기록관리기준표, 공문서분류표, 공약·정책 등을 평가요소로 재구성한 후 종합적으로 적용하여 보유기록물의 장기보존 타당성을 검토하였다. 2단계 평가에서도 장기보존으로 판단되지 않는 기록은 3단계 평가인 주제기반 평가단계에서 역사적사건, 문화재, 수집 정책 등을 적용하여 기록의 역사적 가치 판단을 수행하였다. 설계된 평가체계는 평가에 반영되는 자의성을 최소화하고 평가의 효율성을 높였다는데 의의를 찾을 수 있으며, 기록물이 가진 다양한 맥락과 가치를 종합적으로 반영한 평가가 가능함을 확인하였다. 또한, 균형 잡힌 거시평가와 미시평가를 결합하여 영구기록물관리 기관에 적합한 재평가체계를 수립하였다.