DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Different estimation methods for the unit inverse exponentiated weibull distribution

  • Amal S Hassan (Faculty of Graduate Studies for Statistical Research, Cairo University) ;
  • Reem S Alharbi (Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, King Abdulaziz University)
  • Received : 2022.09.29
  • Accepted : 2023.01.03
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

Unit distributions are frequently used in probability theory and statistics to depict meaningful variables having values between zero and one. Using convenient transformation, the unit inverse exponentiated weibull (UIEW) distribution, which is equally useful for modelling data on the unit interval, is proposed in this study. Quantile function, moments, incomplete moments, uncertainty measures, stochastic ordering, and stress-strength reliability are among the statistical properties provided for this distribution. To estimate the parameters associated to the recommended distribution, well-known estimation techniques including maximum likelihood, maximum product of spacings, least squares, weighted least squares, Cramer von Mises, Anderson-Darling, and Bayesian are utilised. Using simulated data, we compare how well the various estimators perform. According to the simulated outputs, the maximum product of spacing estimates has lower values of accuracy measures than alternative estimates in majority of situations. For two real datasets, the proposed model outperforms the beta, Kumaraswamy, unit Gompartz, unit Lomax and complementary unit weibull distributions based on various comparative indicators.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the editor and referees for their meaningful suggestions and comments relating to the improvement of the paper.

References

  1. Aarset MV (1987). How to identify a bathtub hazard rate, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 36, 106-108. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1987.5222310
  2. Abd AL-Fattah AM, El-Helbawy AA, and Al-Dayian GR (2017). Inverted Kumaraswamy distribution: Properties and estimation, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 33, 37-61.
  3. Anderson TW and Darling DA (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness-of-fit" criteria based on stochastic processes, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729437
  4. Arimoto S (1971). Information-theoretical considerations on estimation problems, Information and Control, 19, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(71)90065-9
  5. Bantan RAR, Jamal F, Chesneau C, and Elgarhy M (2021). Theory and applications of the unit Gamma/Gompertz distribution, Mathematics, 9, 1-22, Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161850
  6. Bhatti FA, Ali A, Hamedani GG, Korkmaz M, and Ahmad M (2021). The unit generalized log Burr XII distribution: Properties and application, AIMS Mathematics, 6, 10222-10252. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021592
  7. Barndorff-Nielsen OE and Jorgensen B (1991). Some parametric models on the simplex, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 39, 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(91)90008-P
  8. Barco KVP, Mazucheli J, and Janeiro V (2017). The inverse power Lindley distribution, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46, 6308-6323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1202274
  9. Cheng RCH and Amin NAK (1979). Maximum product-of-spacings estimation with applications to the lognormal distribution, University of Wales IST, Math Report 791.
  10. Consul PC and Jain GC (1971). On the log-gamma distribution and its properties, Statistical Papers, 12, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922944
  11. Cordeiro GM and dos Santos RB (2012). The beta power distribution, Brazillian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 26, 88-112. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-BJPS124
  12. Ekstrom M (2006). Maximum Product of Spacings Estimation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1-5.
  13. Grassia A (1977). On a family of distributions with argument between 0 and 1 obtained by transformation of the gamma distribution and derived compound distributions, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 19, 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1977.tb01277.x
  14. Ghitany ME, Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, and Alqallaf F (2019). The unit-inverse Gaussian distribution: A new alternative to two-parameter distributions on the unit interval, Communication in Statistics Theory & Methods, 48, 3423-3438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1476717
  15. Gomez-Deniz E, Sordo MA, and Calderin-Ojeda E (2014). The log-Lindley distribution as an alternative to the beta regression model with applications in insurance, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 54, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.10.017
  16. Hassan AS and M Abd-Allah (2019). On the inverse power Lomax distribution, Annals of Data Science, 6, 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-018-0183-y
  17. Hassan AS and Mohamed R (2019). Parameter estimation for inverted exponentiated Lomax distribution with right censored data, Gazi University Journal of Science, 32, 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.452885
  18. Hassan AS, Elgarhy M, and Ragab R (2020). Statistical properties and estimation of inverted ToppLeone distribution, Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 9, 319-331. https://doi.org/10.18576/jsap/090212
  19. Hassan AS, Al-Omari A, Hassan RR, and Alomani GA (2022). The odd inverted Topp Leone-H family of distributions: Estimation and applications, Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Science, 15, 365-379, Available from: https:// doi.org /10.1016/j. jrras. 2022.08.006
  20. Hassan AS, Fayomi A, Algarni A, and Almetwally EM (2022). Bayesian and non-Bayesian inference for unit exponentiated half logistic distribution with data analysis, Applied Sciences, 12, 1-24, Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111 253
  21. Havrda J and Charvat F (1967). Quantification method of classification processes. concept of struc- tural -entropy, Kybernetika, 3, 30-35.
  22. Johnson NL (1949). Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation, Biometrika, 36, 149-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149
  23. Keller AZ and Kamath AR (1982). Reliability analysis of CNC machine tools, Reliability Engineering, 3, 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(82)90036-1
  24. Korkmaz MC and Chesneau C (2021). On the unit Burr-XII distribution with the quantile regression modeling and applications, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01383-5
  25. Kumaraswamy P (1980). A generalized probability density function for double-bounded random processes, Journal of Hydrology, 46, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(80)90036-0
  26. Lee ET and Wang JW (2003). Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  27. Lee S, Noh Y, and Chung Y (2017). Inverted exponentiated weibull distribution with applications to lifetime data, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 24, 227-240. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2017.24.3.227
  28. Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, and Dey S (2018). The unit-Birnbaum-Saunders distribution with applications, Chilean Journal of Statistics, 9, 47-57.
  29. Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, and Chakraborty S (2019a). On the one parameter unit-Lindley distribution and its associated regression model for proportion data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 46, 700-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2018.1511774
  30. Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, and Dey S (2019b). Unit-Gompertz distribution with applications, Statistica, 79, 25-43.
  31. Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, Fernandesa LB, de Oliveirab RP, and Ghitany ME (2020). The unitweibull distribution as an alternative to the Kumaraswamy distribution for the modelling of quantiles conditional on covariates, Journal of Applied Statistics, 47, 954-974, Available from: https://10.1080 /0266 476 3.2 019.1 657813 https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1657813
  32. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, and Teller E (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087-1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114
  33. Mudholkar GS and Srivastava DK (1993). Exponentiated weibull family for analyzing bathtub failurerate data, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 42, 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.229504
  34. Murthy DNP, Xie M, and Jiang R (2004). Weibull Models, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  35. Ranneby B (1984). The maximum spacing method. An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 93-112.
  36. Renyi A (1960). On measures of entropy and information,Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 547-561.
  37. Robert CP (2015). The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. In N Balakrishnan, T Colton, B Everitt, W Piegorsch, F Ruggeri, and JL Teugels (Eds), Wiley Stats Ref: Statistics Reference Online (PP. 1-15), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07834
  38. Swain JJ, Venkatraman S, and Wilson JR (1988). Least-Squares estimation of distribution functions in Johnson's translation system, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 29, 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949658808811068
  39. Shaked M and Shanthikumar JG (2007). Stochastic Orders, Springer, New York.
  40. Sharma VK, Singh SK, Singh U, and Agiwal V (2015). The inverse Lindley distribution: A stressstrength reliability model with application to head and neck cancer data, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32, 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2015.1025901
  41. Tahir MH, Cordeiro GM, Ali S, Dey S, and Manzoor A (2018). The inverted Nadarajah-Haghighi distribution: Estimation methods and applications, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88, 2775-2798. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1487441
  42. Tsallis C (1988). Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, Journal of Statistical Physics, 52, 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429
  43. Topp CW and Leone FC (1955). A family of J-shaped frequency functions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501259