The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Public PMO Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Reuse Intention

공공 PMO 서비스 품질이 고객만족과 고객충성도에 미치는 영향

  • 백형충 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원 산업정보시스템전공 (주식회사 케이씨에이)) ;
  • 김자희 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원 산업정보시스템전공)
  • Received : 2023.02.22
  • Accepted : 2023.03.15
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

After the revision of the Software Promotion Act, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with little experience in e-government projects began to participate in public projects. Accordingly, the government introduced the public Project Management Office (PMO) in July 2013 to reduce the risks and secure the quality of informatization business, and the public PMO is still spreading. However, the public PMO service currently experiences sluggish business, such as low-priced orders, due to cut-throat competition, and thus needs improvement plans. In this research, we establish a research model for quality factors of public PMO services that can be considered for the improvement plans, measure and evaluate quality factors based on the model, and then analyze the impact of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. For that, we measure quality factors using the SERVPERF model for those who have used public PMO services, establish a structural equation research model, and empirically analyze and evaluate the impact of quality factors. Lastly, we suggest improvement plans and implications for public PMO services.

소프트웨어 진흥법 개정 후, 전자정부사업 경험이 적은 중소기업이 공공사업에 참여함에 따라, 정부는 정보화사업의 위험을 줄이고 품질을 확보하기 위해 전자정부사업관리 위탁 제도(PMO)를 2013년 7월 도입하였고, 이는 현재까지 확산되고 있다. 그러나, 현재 공공 PMO 서비스는 과도한 경쟁으로 인해 저가 수주 등의 사업관리 부실이 우려되어 개선안이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는, 이런 개선안을 마련할 때 고려할 수 있는 공공 PMO 서비스의 품질요인에 관한 연구모형을 수립하고, 이를 기반으로 품질요인을 측정 및 평가하여, 서비스 품질이 고객만족 및 고객충성도에 미치는 영향을 분석한다. 이에 공공 PMO 서비스를 이용한 경험자들을 대상으로 SERVPERF 모델을 이용하여 품질요인을 측정하고, 구조방정식 연구모형을 수립하여 품질요인의 영향을 실증분석하고 평가한다. 마지막으로, 공공 PMO 서비스 개선방안과 시사점을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Electronic government act enforcement ordinance amendment. Presidential Decree No. 24654., Republic of Korea, July 2021.
  2. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Regulations on e-government project management commitment.Ministry of Security and Public Administration Announcement, No. 2013-32, Republic of Korea, July 2021.
  3. Ministry of Security and Public Administration. Public hearing for introduction of PMO in public sectors. Republic of Korea, June 2012.
  4. Ministry of Security and Public Administration., National Information Society Agency, "e-government project management consignment introduction and operation guide 2.1", March 2021.
  5. Electronic Times Internet, "Public PMO, volume increased, but not functioning", June 2015, https://www.etnews.com/20150612000201.
  6. Electronic Times Internet, "Public PMO, low-cost orders 'seriously' due to bloody competition. Poor business management 'concerns'", April 2017, https://www.etnews.com/20170419000093.
  7. PMI STANDARDS COMMITTEE, "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide)", Project Management Institute, June 2021.
  8. Bates, W. S., "Improving Project Management", IIE Solutions, Vol. 30, No. 10, pp.42-44, October 1998.
  9. Desouza, K.C. and Evaristo, J.R., "Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 414-423, July 2006, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.002.
  10. Hill, G., "Evolving the Project Management Office: A Competency Continuum", Information Systems Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 45-51, Dcember 2004, DOI: 10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84187.6.
  11. Parasuraman, Anantharanthan, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry, "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research." Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 41-50, Fall 1985, DOI: 10.1177/002224298504900403.
  12. Parasuraman, Anantharanthan, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry, "SERVQUAL; a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality." Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 12-40, Spring 1988.
  13. Parasuraman, Anantharanthan, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry, "More on improving service quality measurement." Journal of Retailing, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 140-147, 1993, DOI: 10.17615/mc5x-r254.
  14. Bai-Sun Suh, Gee-Hyun Hwang, Sung-Kun Kim, "A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention to Adapt PMO in Public Sectors", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 159-169, May 2014. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.159
  15. Back, H.C. and Kang, P.S., "A Priority Analysis on Influential Factors for Invigorating Project Management Office (PMO) in Public Sectors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)", Korea Industrial and System Engineering. Vol. 37, No. 4, pp 42-53, December 2014. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2014.37.4.42
  16. Back, H. C., Park, C. H., Jang, S. Y., & Kim, J. H., "Stakeholder's Valuation of Public PMO SystemUsing Laddering", The Korea Society For Simulation, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 127-136, December 2015. https://doi.org/10.9709/JKSS.2015.24.4.127
  17. Baek, Seungik.,.Kim, Youngsung., Kim, Bongjun., "An Exploratory Study for Evaluating PMO(Project Management Office) Service Quality", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 43-54, July 2006.
  18. Cronin, J. J. Jr. and Taylor, S. A., "Measuring service quality : A reexamination and extension", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 55-68, July 1992, DOI: 10.1177/002224299205600304.
  19. Cronin, J. J. Jr. and Taylor, S. A., "SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL:Reconcilingperformance-based performance-based and perceptions minus expectations measurement of service quality", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, pp. 125-31, January 1994, DOI: 10.1177/002224299405800110.
  20. Gab-doo Lee, "An Empirical Study on the Influence of Service Quality to Customer Satisfaction and Revisit Intention in Pharmacy", Peter Drucker Society of Korea, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 151-189, 2014.
  21. Parasuraman, A., Ztithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 41-50, Autumn 1985, DOI: 10.1177/00222429850490040.
  22. Sang-Sook Han, In-Sun Son, Ja-Chul Gu, Sang-Chul Lee, "The Study on the Effect of Health Care Service Quality upon Customer Loyalty : Based upon SERVPERF", Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 61-72, March 2007.
  23. Oliver, R. L., "A conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction : Compatible goals, different concepts", JAI Press, Vol. 2, pp. 65-85, 1993.
  24. Oliver, R. L., "Satisfaction : A behavioral perspective on the consumer(2nd Edition)", Routledge, December 2014, DOI: 10.4324/9781315700892.
  25. William O. Bearden, Richard L. Oliver, "The Role of Public and Private Complaining in Satisfaction with Problem Resolution.", Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol 19, No. 2, pp. 222-240, December 1985, DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.1985.tb00353.
  26. Taylor A. Steven and Baker, Thomas L. "An Assessment of the Relationship Between Service Quality and Customer in the Formation of Consumers Purchase Intentions." Journal of Retailing. Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 125-142. Summer 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4359(94)90013-2.
  27. Anderson, E W., Fornell, C. & Lehmann, D. R. "Customer satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability:: Findings from Sweden" Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3,pp. 53-66, July 1994, DOI: 10.1177/002224299405800304.
  28. Woo, J. P.,"Structural Equation Mode; Concept and Understanding", Hannari Academy, 2012.