Educational Technology International

The Korean Society for Education Technology (한국교육공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Overcoming the Hurdles of Transition: Middle School Students' Engagement in Distance Instruction During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea

  • Received : 2023.03.01
  • Accepted : 2023.04.13
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aimed to qualitatively examine middle school students' engagement in distance instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants comprised 119 students from a girls' middle school in Seoul, South Korea. To gain an in-depth understanding of the students' experiences, we collected their reflective journals, which included structured items about their learning engagement at three timepoints in 2020: April, July, and December. The following are the results: 10 themes and 18 concepts were derived, and they were integrated into causal conditions (sudden transition due to COVID-19), contextual condition (technology readiness, school education context), central phenomena (high level of behavioral engagement, low emotional engagement), interventional conditions (recognizing the potential of online learning, situational awareness about COVID-19 and online learning), action/interaction phenomena (development and use of self-regulated learning strategies), and consequences (changes in practices and perception towards online learning). Based on the findings, engagement patterns of the participants were classified into five types: proactive, conservative, receptive, reactive, passive learners. The present study demonstrated important findings that are essential for the improvement and development of engaging online learning strategies in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2020S1A5C2A04092451).

References

  1. Aditomo, A. (2015). Students' Response to Academic Setback: "Growth Mindset" as a Buffer against Demotivation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(2), 198-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2015.1482
  2. An, Y., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Yang, J., Conan, J., Kinard, W., & Daughrity, L. (2021). Examining k-12 teachers' feelings, experiences, and perspectives regarding online teaching during the early stage of the covid-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2589-2613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5
  3. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2020(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  4. Barrett, H. C., & Garrett, N. (2009). Online personal learning environments: Structuring electronic portfolios for lifelong and life-wide learning. On the Horizon, 17(2), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120910965511
  5. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103783
  6. Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic Communities of Engagement: An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
  7. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
  8. Britt, M., Goon, D., & Timmerman, M. (2015). How to better engage online students with online strategies. College Student Journal, 49(3), 399-404.
  9. Chen, P. S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not?. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), 1-7.
  10. Chiu, T. K. (2021). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
  11. Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students' academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
  12. Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
  13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  14. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  15. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.
  16. Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., Shin, C. H., & Woo, B. D. (2021). Structural relationships among self-regulation, transactional distance, and learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1832020
  17. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). What do children need to flourish? : School engagement (K.A.Moore & L. Lippman, Ed.). Springer.
  18. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  19. Herzberg, F. (2005). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership (J.B.Miner, Ed.). Routledge.
  20. Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235
  21. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1-9.
  22. Hutchinson, S. A. (1986). Education and grounded theory. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 50-68.
  23. Kahu, E. Stephens, C. Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2013). The engagement of mature distance students. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 791-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777036
  24. Kok, J., & Chabeli, M. M. (2002). Reflective journal writing: How it promotes reflective thinking in clinical nursing education: A students' perspective. Curationis, 25(3), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v25i3.784
  25. Korean Ministry of Education [MOE] (2020). Establishing online learning environment for all students. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=80181&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  26. Kye, B. K., Kim, H. S., Lee, Y. S., Kim, S. W., Son, J. E., & Paik, S. E. (2020). Analysis of primary and secondary school distance education experiences and perceptions according to COVID-19. https://www.keris.or.kr/main/ad/pblcte/selectPblcteRMInfo.do?mi=1139&pblcteSeq=13360
  27. Lee, O. H., Yoo, M. S., & Kim, D. J. (2021). Changes of teachers' perception after online distance learning experience due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 429-458.
  28. Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers' autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498-518. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.37.2.429
  29. Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005
  30. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  31. Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement online: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018
  32. Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students' online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
  33. Muir, T., Milthorpe, N., Stone, C., Dyment, J., Freeman, E., & Hopwood, B. (2019). Chronicling engagement: Students' experience of online learning over time. Distance Education, 40(2), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600367
  34. O'Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). "I 'feel'like I am at university even though I am online." Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970
  35. Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
  36. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16, 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  37. Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131
  38. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(3), 337-386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
  39. Ragusa, A. T., & Crampton, A. (2018). Sense of connection, identity and academic success in distance education: Sociologically exploring online learning environments. Rural Society, 27(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2018.1472914
  40. Rakes, G. C., & Dunn, K. E. (2010). The impact of online graduate students' motivation and self-regulation on academic procrastination. Journal of interactive online learning, 9(1).
  41. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
  42. Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
  43. Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers college record, 104(7), 1393-1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810210400704
  44. Stern, P. N., Allen, L., & Moxley, P. (1982). The nurse as grounded theorist: History, process, and uses. Review Journal of philosophy and social science, 7(142), 200-215.
  45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
  46. Street, H. (2010). Factors influencing a learner's decision to drop-out or persist in higher education distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4), 1-5.
  47. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
  48. Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 49(2), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.002
  49. United Nations Educations Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2020, May 30). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response
  50. Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012
  51. Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., & Williams, J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching environment: A conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences, 118(25), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099
  52. Zhao, H., Xiong, J., Zhang, Z., & Qi, C. (2021). Growth mindset and college students' learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621094