Educational Technology International

The Korean Society for Education Technology (한국교육공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Verification of the Moderating Effect of Course Satisfaction on Learning Presence, and Academic Performance According to Course Delivery Mode

  • Received : 2023.03.01
  • Accepted : 2023.04.04
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the moderating effect of course satisfaction with class on the relationship between the mode of course delivery and learning presence and performance in university settings. Results showed that there was a moderating effect of the course satisfaction on the relationship between course delivery mode and learning presence. Specifically, higher satisfaction with instructor's teaching activities was associated with improved learning presence in face-to-face, blended, and online learning, in that order. However, there was no significant moderating effect on academic performance. These findings suggest that universities should consider not only the mode of course delivery and highlight the importance of systematic course design by instructors.

Keywords

References

  1. Doo, M. Y., Kwon, H. L., & Moon, E. K. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effects of presence on learning performance in online learning environment. Journal of Educational Methods &Theories, 29(1), 185-210.
  2. Garamhand, A., Cha, Y. M., & Lee, H, W. (2022). Differences in learning presence and learning flow by Mongolian middle school distance learning class modes. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 32(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.21024/PNUEDI.32.2.202206.125
  3. Ha, J. W., Jeong, S. J., Jin, S. J., & Y, S. J. (2022). Differences in learning characteristics and learning outcomes by medical school online class types. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 32(1), 251-274.
  4. Hong, S. H., & Jeong, S. (2014). Testing the interaction effects in regression and structural equation models: Theories and procedures. The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 21(4), 1-24.
  5. Jeong, H. H., No,. S. Z., Jeong, J. W., & Jo, Y. H. (2020). The challenge of the spread of Covid-19 to education: High quality remote learning for everyone. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 645-669. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.645
  6. Joo, Y. J., Ha, Y. J., Kim, E. K., & Yoo, J. W. (2010). The structural relationship among teaching presence, cognitive presence, social presence, and learning outcome in cyber university. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 14(2), 175-187.
  7. Kang, D. O. (2021). Effect of the modes of distance learning on the perceived students' academic performance: Analyzing the mediating effects of social presence and learning flow[Master's thesis, Ulsan University]. dCollection@Universty of Ulsan.
  8. Kang, J. H., Son, S. M., & Han, S. T. (2020). A study on the experience of non-face-to-face lecture by college freshmen using focus group interview. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 14(7), 397-408.
  9. Kang, S. H. (2003). The effects of the type of cyber class and self-regulated learning on learning achievement. Korean Association for Educational Information and Broadcasting, 9(4), 209-228.
  10. Kim, B. N., Lee, O. K., & Kang, T. H. (2011). The effect of computer-related characteristics on university students achievement in e-learning course. Journal of Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 23-44.
  11. Kim, D. H., Kang, M. H., & Kang, M. J. (2017). Investigating the educational effects of flipped learning in a college setting. Educational Technology, 29(4), 597-625.
  12. Kim, D. S., Lee, M. H., & Lee, Y. S. (2018). Development the measurement instrument of online self-regulated learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Methods & Theories, 34(4), 901-927.
  13. Kim, H. J. (2021). The effect of class quality and learning presence on academic achievement according to the online class type of university: Intermediate effect of instructional presence and social presence.[Master's Thesis, KonKuk University]. dCollection@konkuk.
  14. Kim, H. N. (2021). Study on lecture satisfaction and learning effect according to the type of distance class due to COVID-19 of teacher's college: Focusing on video production class and real-time video class. Journal of Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(2), 169-193. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.2.169
  15. Kim, J. H., & Kang, M. H. (2010). The impact of the e-tutor on perceived teaching and learning presence in e-Learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 16(3), 407-432.
  16. Kim, J. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2010). A study on relation between social presence and learning outcome in distance education. Journal of Lifelong Education, 16(1), 1-24.
  17. Kim, J. S., & Kang, M. H. (2010). Structural relationship among teaching presence, learning presence, and effectiveness of e-learning in the corporate setting. Asian Journal of Education, 11(2), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.002
  18. Kim, J. W., Park, Y. S., Kim, K. A., & Yang, K. S. (2021). An analysis of college professors' and students' perceptions and experiences of online classes under the COVID-19 situation. Educational Research, 80, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.17253/SWUERI.2021.80..002
  19. Kim, J. Y., Park, I. W., & Jang, J. H. (2017). A study on the effects of the teachers characteristics recognized by students on student's attitude, self-directed learning and academic achievement. Secondary Education Research, 65(4), 731-758. https://doi.org/10.25152/SER.2017.65.4.731
  20. Kim, S. R., Moon, E. K., & Park, I. W. (2015). Investigation on the relationships among students' e-learning readiness, teaching presence and learning effects in an online learning environment. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(4), 687-710.
  21. Ko, Y. J., & Choi, K. (2022). Instructional activities and academic achievement: Mediation effects of class satisfaction with different online course delivery methods. Journal of Educational Methods & Theories, 34(2), 315-341.
  22. Kwon, S. Y. (2011). Examining the relationships among teaching presence, learning approaches, learners' perception of satisfaction and effectiveness in online learning environments. Educational Technology, 27(3), 535-560. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.27.3.535
  23. Kwon, Y. S. (2021). Vergleichsstudie uber unterschied und effektivitat von offline- und online-team-basierten lernaktivitaten durch den einsatz einer platform. Korean Society For German Linguistics, 43, 31-50.
  24. Lee, H. S., & Seo, E. H. (2021). A comparative study on the course satisfaction between remote video class and face-to-face class. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(7), 440-447.
  25. Lee, Y., & Park, I. W. (2012). Investigation on the relationships between learner characteristics, learning strategies, teaching presence, and learning effects in e-learning of cyber university. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.1.137
  26. Lee, Y. S., & Shin, D. K. (2020). An investigation of the implementation of online classes in the untact era caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 23(4), pp.39-57. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2020.23.4.39
  27. Lim, C. I., Lee, J. H., & Lee, D. J. (2021). Educational Technology. KNOUPRESS.
  28. Lim, H. J., & Lee, J. E.(2016). The longitudinal changes of students' perception on teachers' teaching ability, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. The Journal of Korea Youth Research, 23(6), 71-95. 
  29. Milz, S. (2020). Assessing student performance between face-to-face and online course formats in a college-level communications course. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 1-26.
  30. Ministry of Education. (2020.04.01). Full efforts in establishing remote learning environment for all students.
  31. Ministry of Education. (2021). Data on the current status of COVID-19 response in the education field.
  32. Oh, J. S. (2021). Pre-Teachers' perceptions on the different modes of online classes during COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 561-591. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.37.3.561
  33. Pak, K. H., & Kim, Y. M. (2019). The difference analysis of learning presence in online discussion learning based on e-learning. The e-Business Studies, 20(5), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.20462/TeBS.2019.10.20.5.95
  34. Park, H. S., & So, H. J. (2021). Examining the relationships between learning presence and learning performance in distance lectures perceived by university students during COVID-19. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 27(1), 253-280.
  35. Park, H. J., & Yu, B. M. (2014). An analysis of the structural relationships among learning presence, learning flow, learning satisfaction and learning persistence with the use of SNS in university Classes. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(4), 649-674.
  36. Park, J. H., & Lee, Y. S. (2018). The effect of self-regulated learning strategy and presence on academic achievement in web-based e-learning. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 21(7), 440-447.
  37. Shin, M. C., & Eom, W. Y. (2022). Elementary school students' perception of presence and factors affecting the perception by the type of distance learning. The Journal of Elementary Education, 35(2), 33-66. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.35.2.02
  38. Song, B. H., & Lee, J. Y. (2013). Analysis of factors affecting college students' satisfaction and achievement in liberal arts. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 241-261.  https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.2.241
  39. Song, K. E. (2015). A study on effectiveness of teaching-learning presence in English e-learning as corporate education-training. Journal of Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 15(9), 557-575.
  40. Veerasamy, S., & Goswami, S. (2022). Is online learning better than offline learning. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 18(2), 177-190.
  41. Yen, S.-C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and inbetween: Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141-2153.
  42. Yu, B. M., Park. H. J., & Jin, H. S. (2016). The effect of perceived usefulness and attitude of adult learners on learning flow and learning presence. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 23(4), 449-457.  https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2016.23.4.0449