Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Confinement effect on the behavior factor of dual reinforced concrete moment-resisting systems with shear walls

  • Alireza Habibi (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahed University) ;
  • Mehdi Izadpanah (Department of Civil Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology) ;
  • Yaser Rahmani (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kurdistan)
  • Received : 2021.08.18
  • Accepted : 2023.02.28
  • Published : 2023.03.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Lateral pressure plays a significant role in the stress-strain relationship of compressed concrete. Concrete's internal cracking resistance, ultimate strain, and axial strength are improved by confinement. This phenomenon influences the nonlinear behavior of reinforced concrete columns. Utilizing behavior factors to predict the nonlinear seismic responses of structures is prevalent in seismic codes, and this factor plays a vital role in the seismic responses of structures. This study aims to evaluate the confining action on the behavior factor of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (RCMRFs) with shear walls (SWRCMRFs). To this end, a diverse range of mid-rise SW-RCMRFs was initially designed based on the Iranian national building code criteria. Second, the stress-strain curve of each element was modeled twice, both with and without the confinement phenomenon. Each frame was then subjected to pushover analysis. Finally, the analytical behavior factors of these frames were computed and compared to the Iranian seismic code behavior factor. The results demonstrate that confining action increased the behavior factors of SW-RCMRFs by 7-12%.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulhameed, H., Mansi, A., Mohammed, A., Abdulhameed, A. and Hanoon, A. (2021), "Study the use of nano-limestone and Egg-shell ash in Eco-friendly SCC: An experimental and statistical evaluation based on computer programming", 2021 14th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), 509-514.
  2. Aliakbari, F. and Shariatmadar, H. (2019), "Seismic response modification factor for steel slit panel-frames", Eng. Struct., 181, 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.027.
  3. American Society of Civil Engineers (2013), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, October.
  4. Asgarian, B. and Shokrgozar, H.R. (2009), "BRBF response modification factor", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(2), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.002.
  5. ATC-19 (1995), Structural Response Modification Factors, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California
  6. Aydemir, M.E. and Aydemir, C. (2016), "Overstrength factors for SDOF and MDOF systems with soil structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 10(6), 1273-1289. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1273.
  7. Baduge, S.K., Mendis, P. and Ngo, T. (2018), "Stress-strain relationship for very-high strength concrete (>100 MPa) confined by lateral reinforcement", Eng. Struct., 177, 795-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.008.
  8. BHRC (2015), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800, 4th Edition, Building and Housing Research Center.
  9. Borzi, B. and Elnashai, A.S. (2000), "Refined force reduction factors for seismic design", Eng. Struct., 22(10), 1244-1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00075-9.
  10. Choi, S.J., Lee, S.W. and Kim, J.H.J. (2017), "Impact or blast induced fire simulation of bi-directional PSC panel considering concrete confinement and spalling effect", Eng. Struct., 149, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.056.
  11. Chun, S.S. and Park, H.C. (2002), "Load carrying capacity and ductility of RC columns confined by carbon fiber reinforced polymer", Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure, Univ. of Arizona, San Francisco, June.
  12. Council, B.S.S. (2000), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Report FEMA-356, Washington, DC.
  13. Elnashai, A.S. and Mwafy, A.M. (2002), "Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 11(5), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.204.
  14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997), NEHRP Guideline for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-273, Washington, DC.
  15. Gad, E.F., Chandler, A.M., Duffield, C.F. and Hutchinson, G.L. (1999), "Earthquake ductility and overstrength in residential structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 8(4), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1999.8.4.361.
  16. Guner, T. and Topkaya, C. (2020), "Performance comparison of BRBFs designed using different response modification factors. Eng. Struct., 225, 111281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111281.
  17. Habibi, A. and Izadpanah, M. (2017), "Improving the linear flexibility distribution model to simultaneously account for gravity and lateral loads", Comput. Concrete, 20(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.1.011.
  18. Habibi, A. and Moharrami, H. (2010), "Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of reinforced concrete frames", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 46(7), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.02.005.
  19. Habibi, A., Gholami, R. and Izadpanah, M. (2019). Behavior factor of vertically irregular RCMRFs based on incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Struct., 16(6), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.655.
  20. Habibi, A., Izadpanah, M. and Fam, M.G. (2021), "An approximate method for determining the behavior factor of RCMRFs with vertical irregularity", Comput. Concrete, 28(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.28.3.243.
  21. Hummel, J. and Seim, W. (2019), "Displacement-based design approach to evaluate the behaviour factor for multi-storey CLT buildings", Eng. Struct., 201, 109711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109711.
  22. Izadpanah, M. (2023), "Influence of MIWs on the seismic responses of moment resisting RCFs: A practical method", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 165, 107699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107699.
  23. Izadpanah, M. and Habibi, A. (2018), "Evaluating the accuracy of a new nonlinear reinforced concrete beam-column element comprising joint flexibility", Earthq. Struct., 14(6), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.525.
  24. Izadpanah, M. and Habibi, A.R. (2018), "New spread plasticity model for reinforced concrete structural elements accounting for both gravity and lateral load effects", J. Struct. Eng., 144(5), 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002016.
  25. Jing, D.H. (2006), "Researches on models of stress-strain and applications in rehabilitation for concrete confined by FRP", Doctoral Dissertation, Southeast University, China.
  26. Johnson, T.P. and Dowell, R.K. (2017), "Evaluation of the overstrength factor for nonstructural component anchorage into concrete via dynamic shaking table tests", J. Build. Eng., 11, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.04.017.
  27. Kappos, A.J. (1999), "Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies", Eng. Struct., 21(9), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00050-9.
  28. Kheyroddin, A. and Mashhadiali, N. (2018). Response modification factor of concentrically braced frames with hexagonal pattern of braces", J. Constr. Steel Res., 148, 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.024.
  29. Liu, P., Zhou, X. and Qian, Q. (2021), "Experimental investigation of rigid confinement effects of radial strain on dynamic mechanical properties and failure modes of concrete", Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 31(5), 939-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.001.
  30. Liu, P., Zhou, X., Qian, Q., Berto, F. and Zhou, L. (2020), "Dynamic splitting tensile properties of concrete and cement mortar", Fatig. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 43(4), 757-770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13162.
  31. Macedo, L., Silva, A. and Castro, J.M. (2019), "A more rational selection of the behaviour factor for seismic design according to Eurocode 8", Eng. Struct., 188, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.007.
  32. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  33. Mansi, A.S., Abdulhameed, H.A. and Yong, Y.K. (2018), "Development of low-shrinkage rapid set composite and simulation of shrinkage cracking in concrete patch repair", International Conference on Transportation and Development 2018: Airfield and Highway Pavements, Reston, VA.
  34. Miranda, E. (1993), "Site-dependent strength-reduction factors", J. Struct. Eng., 119(12), 3503-3519. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3503).
  35. Mohsenian, V., Padashpour, S. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2020), "Seismic reliability analysis and estimation of multilevel response modification factor for steel diagrid structural systems", J. Build. Eng., 29, 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101168.
  36. Nassar, A. and Krawinkler, K. (1991), "Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF", Report No. 95, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.
  37. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1973), "Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities", Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards (NBS), Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD, US.
  38. ONBR (2009), National Building Regulations, part 9: Design and Construction of R.C. Buildings, Office of National Building Regulations, Tehran, Iran.
  39. Pan, Y., Rui, G., Li, H., Tang, H. and Xu, L. (2017), "Study on stress-strain relation of concrete confined by CFRP under preload", Eng. Struct., 143, 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.004.
  40. Rahmani, Y. (2017), "Confinement effect on the behavior factor of reinforced concrete frames with shear wall", M.Sc Thises, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
  41. Salimbahrami, S.R. and Gholhaki, M. (2019), "Effects of higher modes and Degrees of Freedom (DOF) on strength reduction factor in reinforced concrete frames equipped with steel plate shear wall", Struct., 19, 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.01.015.
  42. SeismoStruct (2016), A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures.
  43. Spoelstra, M.R. and Monti, G. (1999), "FRP-confined concrete model", J. Compos. Constr., 3(3), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1999)3:3(143).
  44. Uang, C.M. (1991), "Establishing R (or R w) and C d factors for building seismic provisions", J. Struct. Eng., 117(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19).
  45. Vamvatsikos, D. and Allin Cornell, C. (2006), "Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1097-1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.573.
  46. Wang, H.Y. (2014), "Influence of high mode effects on ductility reduction factors for MDOF shear-type structures", Appl. Mech. Mater., 578, 412-416. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.578-579.412.
  47. Zerbin, M., Aprile, A., Beyer, K. and Spacone, E. (2019), "Ductility reduction factor formulations for seismic design of RC wall and frame structures", Eng. Struct., 178, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.020.