DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental Planning Elements of Public Space for the Improvement of Urban Publicness From the Perspective of Small Households

소형가구 관점에서 도시 공공성 향상을 위한 공공공간의 환경계획요소에 관한 연구

  • Oh, Jieun (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ha, Mikyoung (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University) ;
  • Byun, Gidong (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.11.03
  • Accepted : 2023.03.14
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the perception of publicness in urban spaces from the viewpoint of small households, which are the main household type in modern society. Environmental planning factors in public spaces were identified to potentially enhance the publicness of urban spaces and ultimately improve the quality of life for people residing in urban areas. Through research, it was discovered that small households highly value publicness and acknowledge its importance in enhancing the overall quality of life. However, it also revealed that publicness was not adequately maintained in such areas. To address this issue, this study emphasized the significance of urban public spaces that are commonly utilized in everyday life to improve publicness. Several public space types that small households value were identified as being medical facilities, street spaces, transportation facilities, welfare facilities, and information and culture facilities. Environmental planning factors to enhance the publicness of individual public spaces were derived through correlation analysis of detailed publicness evaluation factors such as connectivity, accessibility, openness, convenience, amenity, placeness, sustainability, and public space types. The findings of this study are anticipated to serve as fundamental data for future strategies that reflect social structural changes and improve the publicness of urban spaces. By enhancing the publicness of urban spaces, this study expects to boost the quality of life for individuals and society overall.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 한국연구재단 4단계 BK21 사업과 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 신진연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NFR-2020S1A5A8042212).

References

  1. Branas, C. C., Kondo, M. C., Murphy, S. M., South, E. C., Polsky, D., & MacDonald, J. M. (2016). Urban blight remediation as a cost-beneficial solution to firearm violence. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2158-2164.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303434
  2. Esteban O. (2019). The rise of living alone: how one-person households are becoming increasingly common around the world.
  3. Fidelma, B., John, C., & Carol, A. (2018). A literature scoping review of eating practices and food environments in 1 and 2-person households in the UK, Australia and USA. Journal of Appetite, 126, 43-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.005
  4. Hong. S., Kim, Y., & Ahn, K. (2011). Residential mobility patterns and pull-factors of small households in Seoul. Urban Design Institute of Korea, 1294), 51-62. 
  5. Jo, Y., Yang, E., & Kim, K. (2019). A study on the spatial composition of urban small-housing for 1.2 people household: focused on domestic and japanese narrow housing cases. Journal of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 20(6), 489-504.  https://doi.org/10.47294/KSBDA.20.6.36
  6. Kim H. (2019). What are the policy responses to increasing one-person households across the Globe. Global social security review, 11(0), 5-15. 
  7. Kang, J. (2021). A study on residential satisfaction characteristics of single-person households in Seoul (Master dissertation). Seoul National University of Public Enterprise Policy, Seoul, South Korea. 
  8. Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2014). The factors of choice of residences of small household - focused on case of Seoul -. Journal of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. 14(4), 97-102. 
  9. Kim, J., & Chung, E. (2011). Estimation of tenure choice and housing demand decisions of small-sized households in Korea. Journal of Korean Association For Housing Policy Studies, 19(2), 123-150. 
  10. Kim, S., Wang, K., Kwon, Y., & An, Y. (2007). Rational supply direction of urban planning facility by publicity: concentrate on mixed-use complex of private sector participant. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. 1-248. 
  11. Kim, S. (2013). A study on the public library's space planning and characteristics for the user-oriented publicness. Journal of Korean Institute of Interior Design, 22(3), 52-60.  https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2013.22.3.052
  12. Kim, Y., & Jo, I. (2020). A study on living characteristics and housing service needs of single person households. Journal of the Korean housing association, 31(5), 11-24.  https://doi.org/10.6107/jkha.2020.31.5.011
  13. Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: how social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown publishing. 
  14. Lee, J., & Cho, W. (2021). A study on the characteristic of public infrastructure facilities through Eric Klinenberg's social infrastructure concept, Journal of the Korea Institute of the Spatial Design, 16(7), 421-434. 
  15. Lee, J., & Yang, J. (2012). Housing policy directions for single- and two-person households in Seoul. The Seoul Institute, 1-132. 
  16. Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2019). A study on the change of housing options in accordance with the increase of one person household. Journal of Korea Community Development Society, 44(2), 93-107. 
  17. Miguel, L., Sara S, C., & Paulo, P. (2020). Publicness of contemporary urban space: comparative study between Porto and Newcastle. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(4), 04020033. 
  18. Lee, S., Tchah, C., & Lim, Y. (2007). A Study on the concept and current issues of urban public space. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 1-231. 
  19. Lee, S., Kim, Y., Lee, Y., & Jae, J. (2017). A study on the promotion of urban public space utilization : focusing on private participation. National Library of Korea, (7), 0-0. 
  20. Lee, Y. (2017). One-person households and their policy implications. Journal of Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 252( ), 64-77. 
  21. Moon, H., & Song, N. (2020). Influence of living infrastructures on the distribution of single-person households and quality of life. The Seoul Institute, 21(4), 163-181.  https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.21.4.202012.163
  22. Oh, J. (2018). One-person households, access to public transportation for residential selection, Korea Transport Institute. 
  23. Oh, J., Lee, G., Ha, M., & Byun, G. (2022). Basic research to establish publicity evaluation index of urban public space. Proceeding Conference of Architectural Institute of Korea, 42(1), 1-4. 
  24. Oh, J., Yoo, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). Analysis on 1.2 person household selection factor of small house in Geumcheon-Gu. Journal of Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 11(2), 233-247. 
  25. Park, C., Lee, J., Lee, S., & Han, J. (2010). Chungcheongnam-do urban public space survey and improvement plan. Chungnam Development Institute, 1-124. 
  26. Park, T., & Shin, H. (2020). Constructs and a dynamic model of publicness in modernity: a complex Value system. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 58(3), 93-124.  https://doi.org/10.24145/KJPA.58.3.4
  27. Seo, D., & Lim, J. (2016). A study about public space pattern for place identity. Journal of the Korea Institute of the Spatial Design, 11(1), 89-99.  https://doi.org/10.35216/kisd.2016.11.1.89
  28. Shin, S. (2010). Study on the architectural design for the user-oriented multi-layered publicness (Masters dissertation), Seoul National University of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul, South Korea. 
  29. Ulrich, RS. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-21.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
  30. Youm, C., Cho, J., & Sim, K. (2009). A fundamental study on the contemporary publicness of architecture & urban Space. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 2008(n.8), 1-232.