DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Planning Performance of Road Construction Projects Using Preliminary Feasibility Analysis Data

예비타당성조사 결과를 활용한 도로건설사업의 계획단계 성과 분석 연구

  • Mun, Junbu (Department of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Yun, Sungmin (Department of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam University)
  • 문준부 (영남대학교 건설시스템공학과 ) ;
  • 윤성민 (영남대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.19
  • Accepted : 2022.10.26
  • Published : 2023.01.31

Abstract

According to the post evaluation scheme in Korea of a public construction project which is more than 30 Billion KRW, project performance is evaluated by investigating outcomes and effects of the construction after the completion of the project. The current post evaluation results can be used for planning and estimating a construction project in the future. However, it is not easy to utilized for an on-going project because the system does not provide the phase-based performance of a project. Although project planning performance is important for project initiation, few attempt has been made to evaluate planning performance in Korea. The purpose of this study is to provide a conceptual performance evaluation of planning performance using preliminary feasibility study conducted by Korea Development Institute. This study developed a planning performance database using data extracted from preliminary feasibility study reports of the completed 354 road construction projects. This study analyzed the performance of the planning stage of road projects by developing absolute metrics such as standard construction cost and standard construction schedule based on a Lane-Km. Using the standard construction cost and schedule metrics, the planning performance was analyzed by project characteristics. The results of this study can be used for phase-based performance evaluation from planning phase to construction phase.

현재 국내에서는 건설공사 사후평가 제도에 따라 사업 준공 후 공사내용 및 그 효과를 조사하여 프로젝트의 성과를 평가하고 향후 계획된 유사 건설사업의 효율적인 수행을 위한 자료로 활용하고 있다. 그러나 건설사업의 성과를 보다 효과적으로 관리하기 위해서는 프로젝트 진행 과정에서 단계별 성과를 평가하여 그에 따른 유연한 관리전략을 수립할 수 있어야 한다. 따라서 건설사업의 효율적인 성과관리를 위해서는 건설사업 단계별 성과평가체계가 필요하다. 본 연구는 건설사업 초기단계의 성과를 평가할 수 있는 계획단계 벤치마킹을 위한 기초 모델을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 한국개발연구원에서 제공하고 있는 예비타당성 조사 보고서 중 완료된 도로공사 354건에 대해 데이터베이스를 구축하였다. 계획단계 성과를 평가할 성과지표로 시설용량을 기준으로 한 표준공사비와 표준공사기간 지표를 개발하여 도로사업의 계획단계의 성과를 분석할 수 있는 벤치마킹 모델을 제시하였다. 이를 통해 도로사업 계획단계의 표준공사비 및 표준공사기간을 산정하고, 도로사업의 특성별 차이를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 활용하여 계획단계의 성과와 설계 및 시공단계의 성과를 연계하여 분석한다면 건설사업 생애주기 동안의 성과관리가 가능할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2022년도 산업통상자원부의 재원으로 한국산업기술진흥원(P0008475, 2022년 스마트디지털엔지니어링전문인력양성사업)과 과학기술정보통신부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2020R1F1A1070612).

References

  1. Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea (CERIK) (2018). Suggestion for Institutional Improvement on Cost Estimation and Management of Public Construction.
  2. Gardner, B.J., Gransberg, D.D., and Jeong, H.D. (2016). "Reducing data-collection efforts for conceptual cost estimating at a highway agency." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11), 04016057.
  3. Kim, S.I. (2010). "Study on Development of Evaluation Criteria of Project Management for Public Const ruction Projects." National Assembly Budget Office.
  4. Kim, T.Y., and Park, H.S. (2016). "Effective Analysis Framework for Construction Post Evaluation." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, 36(6), pp. 1145-1152. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2016.36.6.1145
  5. Korea Development institute (KDI) (2008). General Guide for Preliminary Feasibility Study - Revision and Supplementation, 5th Edition.
  6. Lee, D.H. (2016). "Performance Analysis of Public Construction Projects by Contract Methods." KSCE Conference Proceedings, pp. 45-46.
  7. Lee, D.H., Kim, S.K., Choi, J.H., and Lee, W.S. (2010). "A Study of Corporate Benchmarking Process with Focus on the Characteristics of Korean Construction Industry." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 11(6), pp. 24-34. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.6.24
  8. Lee, S.W., Woo, S.K., and Kim, O.K. (2009). "A Study on Evaluation of Construction Project Owner's Organizational Competency." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(1), pp. 146-155.
  9. Mahdavian, A., Shojaei, A., Salem, M., Yuan, J.S., and Oloufa, A.A. (2021). "Data-Driven Predictive Modeling of Highway Construction Cost Items." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3), 04020180.
  10. McCabe, S. (2008). Benchmarking in Construction. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. OK, H., and Yang, S.H. (2014). "Development of the Construction Post-evaluation System in Public Construction Projects." Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, KAIS, 15(12), pp. 7364-7371. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.12.7364
  12. OK, H., and Kim, J.U. (2015). "A Study on the Advancement Planning of the Construction Post-evaluation System." Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, KIIT, 13(12), pp. 141-149. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2015.13.12.141
  13. Song, D.H., and Go, S.S. (2014). "A Study on the Selection of Ex-Post Evaluation Items of Construction Project based on the Preliminary Feasibility Study." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 16(2), pp. 125-134.
  14. Yun, S.M., Choi, J.Y., Oliveira D.P., and Mulva, S.P. (2015). "Development of performance metrics for phase-based capital project benchmarking." International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), pp. 389-402
  15. Yun, S.M. (2016). "Development and Implementation of Phase-based Performance Assessment System for Construction Projects.." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, 64(12), pp. 72-75.
  16. Yun, S.M., Choi, J.Y., Oliveira, D.P., Mulva, S.P., and Kang, Y.C. (2016). "Measuring project management inputs throughout capital project delivery." International Journal of Project Management, 34(11), pp. 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.004
  17. Yun, S.M., and Jung, W.Y. (2017). "Benchmarking Sustainability Practices Use throughout Industrial Construction Project Delivery." Sustainability, 9(6), 1007.