Research in Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding a Mathematics Teacher Community through a Computational Text Analysis: Review of Changes in Mathematics Pedagogical Lexicons by Lee & Kim (2022)

  • Sunghwan Hwang (Department of Mathematics Education, Chuncheon National of Education) ;
  • Eunhye Flavin (Department of Education Studies, Stonehill College)
  • Received : 2023.03.13
  • Accepted : 2023.03.27
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mathematics educators have emphasized the importance of language use in mathematics education. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on the spoken language used in mathematics classrooms, which provides limited information on the written language used by mathematics teachers. The written language reflects the characteristics of the teacher community and social, cultural, and political contexts. Moreover, the written language affects teachers' instructional practices and their students' mathematics learning experiences. Therefore, this study aims to review a study conducted by Lee and Kim (2022) investigating changes in mathematics teachers' pedagogical lexicons.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, H. M., & Kim, H. J. (2018). The international classroom lexicon project: A study on the pedagogical lexicons survey in the Korean mathematics classroom. School Mathematics, 23(3), 463-481. 
  2. Dobie, T. E., & Sherin, B. (2021). The language of mathematics teaching: A text mining approach to explore the zeitgeist of US mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 159-188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10019-8
  3. Foster, C., & Inglis, M. (2019). Mathematics teacher professional journals: What topics appear and how has this changed over time? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1627-1648. 
  4. Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. Guilford Publications. 
  5. Inglis, M., & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462-500.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462
  6. Kwon, S. K., Lee, M., & Shin, D. (2017). Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 60-77.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1074540
  7. Lee, G. M., & Kim, H. J. (2022). Changes in mathematics pedagogical lexicons: Extension research of the international classroom lexicon using a text mining approach. The Mathematical Education, 61(4), 559-579.  https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2022.61.4.559
  8. Ministry of Education. (2022). Mathematics curriculum. 2022-33(Book 8). 
  9. Ro, J. (2019). Learning to teach in the era of test-based accountability: A review of research. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 87-101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1514525
  10. Shin, D. (2020). A comparative study of domestic and international research trends of mathematics education through topic modeling. The Mathematical Education, 59(1), 63-80.  https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.1.63
  11. Xu, L., & Mesiti, C. (2022). Teacher orchestration of student responses to rich mathematics tasks in the US and Japanese classrooms. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 54(2), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01322-6