DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학 교양교육에서 단위변환에 대한 교육 방향 제시

A Guide to Education on Unit Transformation in University Liberal Arts Education

  • 정경아 (조선대학교 융합수리과학부) ;
  • 김혜정 (조선대학교 융합수리과학부)
  • kyung a jeong (Chosun university Faculty of Convergence and Repair Science) ;
  • hye jeong kim (Chosun university Faculty of Convergence and Repair Science)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.12
  • 심사 : 2023.12.22
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31

초록

After the SI system of units was adopted as an international system of units, Korea made a lot of efforts such as administrative and educational guidance on the traditional units that had been used so far. In addition, from July 1, 2007, the government has cracked down on the denotation of non-statutory units of measurement as standard units or auxiliary units in commercial transactions. However, non-statutory weighing units are still used in other forms. It is believed that this is because non-statutory units (= our traditional units) are permeated in our lives and are convenient to use. The general public still finds it difficult to use and mark the SI system of units correctly. This is not a problem unique to Korea. However, if you look at the books that are currently used as university physics textbooks, the SI system of units and the non-legal units of other countries are marked in such a way that they can be accurately converted. Only the traditional units of our country are disappearing under the pretext of unit unification. Accordingly, we propose that our units should not be neglected in university education, but should be labeled together. The purpose of this study is to raise the necessity of reorganizing the unit conversion between the SI unit system and the traditional life improvement unit, which continues to be the convenience of life, and applying it in university physics education to enable the conversion with our traditional unit, and to educate the importance of the meaning and function of our traditional unit.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. [류병찬. (2009). 우리나라 지적제도의 기원에 관한 연구 - 고조선 시대를 중심으로 -. 한국지적학회지, 25(1), 43-60.] https://doi.org/10.22988/KSC.2009.25.1.004
  2. [이인재. (2002). 유물로 본 도량형의 역사. 지역과 역사, 10, 135-148.]
  3. [김현종. (2018). 「大東地志」 「程里考」에 기반한 조선후기의 1리(里). 대한지리학회지, 53(4), 501-522.]
  4. [남영. (2009). 활자 인쇄술 개발의 前後史에 대한 再檢討 - '기술의 우열'에서 '문화적 다양성'으로 -. 중앙사론, 29, 1-37.]
  5. [전용훈. (2020). 전상운 선생과 한국천문학사 연구. 한국과학사학회지, 42(3), 731-744.]
  6. [이종학 and 전영주. (2019). 한국 초등수학 교과서의 도량형 서술 내용에 대한 분석. 한국학교수학회논문집, 22(3), 183-197.] https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2019.22.3.001
  7. [이정수. (2017). 【서평】한국의 고대에서 현대까지 도량형의 변천을 일관하다 -이종봉 지음, 「한국 도량형사」, 소명출판, 2016-. 지역과 역사, 41, 319-330.]
  8. 熊長雲 and 오정은. (2020). 출토자료에 보이는 중국 고대의 數量詞와 量制. 木簡과 文字, 24, 157-196.]