Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The new criterion on performance-based design and application to recent earthquake codes

  • Azer A., Kasimzade (Department of Civil Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University) ;
  • Emin, Nematli (Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ondokuz Mayis University) ;
  • Mehmet, Kuruoglu (Department of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University)
  • Received : 2021.08.25
  • Accepted : 2022.12.16
  • Published : 2023.01.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

"Performance-based design (PBD)" is based on designing a structure with choosing a performance target under design criteria to increase the structure's resistance against earthquake effect. The plastic hinge formation is determined as one of the fundamental data in finite elements nonlinear analysis to distinguish the condition of the structure where more significant potential damage could occur. If the number of plastic hinges in the structure is increased, the total horizontal load capability of the structure is increased, also. Theoretically, when the number of plastic hinges of the plane frame structure reaches "the degree of hyperstaticity plus one", the structure will reach the capability of the largest ultimate horizontal load. As the number of plastic hinges to be formed in the structure increases towards the theoretical plastic hinge number (TPHN), the total horizontal load capability of the structure increases, proportionally. In the previous studies of the authors, the features of examining the new performance criteria were revealed and it was formulated as follows "Increase the total number of plastic hinges to be formed in the structure to the number of theoretical plastic hinges as much as possible and keep the structure below its targeted performance with related codes". With this new performance criterion, it has been shown that the total lateral load capability of the building is higher than the total lateral load capability obtained with the traditional PBD method by the FEMA 440 and FEMA 356 design guides. In this study, PBD analysis results of structures with frame carrier systems are presented in the light of the Turkey Building Earthquake Code 2019. As a result of this study, it has been shown that the load capability of the structure in the examples of structures with frame carrier system increases by using this new performance criterion presented, compared to the results of the examination with the traditional PBD method in TBEC 2019.

Keywords

References

  1. Allahvirdizadeh, R. and Mohammadi, M.A. (2016), "Upgrading equivalent static method of seismic designs to performance-based procedure", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 849-865. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.849.
  2. Chiras, A.A. (1969), Methods of Linear Programming Applied to Design of Elastic-plastic Systems, Stroyizdat Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Chiras, A.A. (1989), Structural Mechanics, Stroyizdat Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Choudhury, S. and Singh, S. (2013), "A unified approach to performance-based design of RC frame structures", J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D., 94, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-013-0037-8.
  5. Darkov, A.V. (1983), Structural Mechanics, Mir Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  6. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  7. FEMA 440 (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  8. Gvozdev, A.A. (1949), Calculation of Bearing Capability of Structures by the Method of Limiting Equilibrium, Stroyizdat Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  9. IBC (2012), International Building Code (IBC), International Conference of Structure Officials, Vol. 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions, Whittier, CA, USA.
  10. Kasimzade, A. (1999), "Peculiarities apply finite elements method to the plastic analyze", Proceedings of the 4th International Fracture Mechanics Conference, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
  11. Kasimzade, A. (2018), Finite Element Method: Foundation and Application to Structural Analysis, Nobel Publication.
  12. Kasimzade, A., Nematli, E., Mammadzada, V. and Atmaca, G. (2020), "New design criteria in performance-based earthquake engineering", Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., 4(5), 1065-1074.
  13. Kasimzade, A.A., Safak, E., Ventura, C.E., Naeim, F. and Mukai, Y. (2018), Seismic Isolation, Structural Health Monitoring, and Performance Based Seismic Design in Earthquake Engineering: Recent Developments, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
  14. Kasimzade, A.A. and Nematli, E. (2021), "New design criteria's developments on performance based aseismic design", The International Congress on Phenomenological Aspects in Civil Engineering (PACE-2021), Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, June.
  15. Kasimzade, A.A., Tuhta, S., Atmaca, G., Alameri, I. and Abrar, O. (2018), "Novel approach on performance-based aseismic design based on FEMA requirements", Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., 3(1), 812- 816. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd19068.
  16. Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M. and Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2014), "Life-cycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: Performance-based seismic design approach", Earthq. Struct., 7(3), 271-294. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.271.
  17. Kurmi, P.L. and Choudhury, S. (2020), "Effect of infill on unified performance-based design of RC frame buildings", Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Systems, Energy & Environment (NCSEE '14) Government College of Engineering Kannur, Kerala, India, March.
  18. Naeim, F. (2010), "Performance based seismic design of tall structures", Earthq. Eng. Eur., 17, 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9544-2_7.
  19. Naeim, F., Bhatia, R. and Lobo, M. (2001), Performance Based Seismic Engineering, the Seismic Design Handbook, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, USA.
  20. Priestley, M. (2000), "Performance based seismic design", Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 33(3), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.325-346.
  21. Priestley, M., Calvi, G. and Kowalsky, M. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  22. Rzhanitsin, A.R. (1954), Structural Design Involving Plastic Properties of Materials, Stroyizdat Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  23. Rzhanitsin, A.R. (1982), Structural Mechanics, Stroyizdat Publishers, Moscow, Russia.
  24. SAP2000 (2019), SAP2000 v21, Manual, Computers and Structures Inc., USA.
  25. Shoeibi, S., Kafi, M.A. and Gholhaki, M. (2017), "New performance based seismic design method for structures with structural fuse system", Eng. Struct., 13(2), 745-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.002.
  26. TBEC (2019), Turkey Building Earthquake Code, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ministry of Interior, Ankara, Turkey.
  27. Tian, Y., Lu, X, Lu, X., Li, M. and Guan, H. (2016), "Quantifying the seismic resilience of two tall buildings designed using Chinese and US Codes", Earthq. Struct., 11(6), 925-942. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.925.
  28. Xiong, Z., Huo, X, Chen, X., Xu, J., Xiong, W. and Zhuge, Y. (2020), "Assessment of seismic damage on frame structures across the earth fissure under earthquake", Earthq. Struct., 18(4), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.4.423.
  29. Zameruddin, M. and Zangle, K. (2016), "Review on recent developments in the performance based seismic design of reinforced concrete structures", Struct., 6, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.03.001.
  30. Zhang, C. and Tian, Y. (2019), "Simplified performance based optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings", Eng. Struct., 185, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.108.
  31. Zhang, X., Ren, Q., Liu, W., Yang, S. and Zhou, Y. (2020), "Seismic design and elastic-plastic analysis of the hengda group super high-rise office buildings", Earthq. Struct., 19(3), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.3.175.