Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.31-48
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2287-9099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4577(eISSN)
한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터 (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Formulating a Conceptual Model of Digital Service Transformation Based on a Systematic Literature Review

  • 투고 : 2022.04.22
  • 심사 : 2022.12.24
  • 발행 : 2023.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Digital service transformation study is a part of research in the field of digital transformation, which is devoted to exploring the transformations that occur in digital service products, which have been intensely explored in recent years to address digital disruption. Several concepts and definitions of digital service transformation have emerged as a result of an approach from the point of view of digital transformation and digital services concepts. This paper is organized to provide a foundational understanding of digital service transformation terminology. This paper uses the systematic literature review method to compile 52 qualified articles from previous studies. We conduct an analysis and synthesis of articles to answer research questions. The results of this study are a descriptive summary of research in the digital service transformation field, determining digital service transformation terminology and components, and also a proposed digital service transformation model to explain the position of transformation in digital service products in the overall transformation process. We construct this model using the findings of previously determined components synthesis.

키워드

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Research Background

Digital technology, digital innovation, and digitization have fundamentally changed every social, cultural, and economic aspect of human life. This phenomenon has changed business aspects such as processes, products, services, and relationships (Osmundsen et al., 2018). Digitalization is experiencing dynamic development along with the presence of Industry 4.0 and rapid environmental changes such as the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic (Kutnjak, 2021). Industry 4.0 is supported by digital technology and innovations known as SMACIT (Vial, 2019) such as social media, mobile apps, data analytics, cloud computing, and the Internet of things (IoT), to add potential value to the enterprise. Meanwhile, the emergence of pandemic impacts reducing social interaction, social distancing, lockdowns, and movement restrictions force enterprises to accelerate new value creation by optimizing digital technology and digitization.

The new value-creation process utilizing digital technology, innovation, and digitization is referred to as digital transformation (Aguiar et al., 2019). Digital transformation is a new effort in utilizing digital artifacts, symbols, and systems to enable business development such as improving customer experience, streamlining business processes, or creating new business models (Fitzgerald et al., 2014). Digital transformation covers almost all aspects and dimensions of the organization (Gebayew et al., 2018; Zaoui & Souissi, 2021). Service and its innovation as an organization’s product is the one aspect which is transformed (Mihardjo et al., 2020a). Another source states that for a successful implementation of digital transformation, service is the core of all (Matzner et al., 2018). Service innovation, including digital services, is an important focus to consider in the transformation process. Digital services that experience a transformation process through digital technology/innovation become part of digital transformation (Matzner et al., 2018). Some refer to it as digital service transformation (Klötzner, 2016; Matzner et al., 2018).

Until this research was conducted, not so many studies have specifically discussed digital service transformation terms. Some publications mentioning digital service transformation equate this concept with digital transformation (Mihardjo et al., 2020a, 2020b) or service transformation (Omar et al., 2017; Weerakkody et al., 2016) or digital servitization (Klötzner, 2016). The digital service transformation concept still varies according to the understanding of each researcher. This difference is caused, as an example, in manufacturing enterprises; relevant research on digital service transformation is still insufficient, particularly in terms of empirical testing and transformation mechanisms (Shen et al., 2021). Another study stated there is a gap in digital service ecosystem transformation theoretical knowledge. The conceptual boundaries are still ambiguous, and research in this area lacks impact (Tana et al., 2019), which becomes a research potential in the context of digital service transformation (Augenstein, 2017).

1.2. Scope and Purpose

This research aims to formulate a conceptual model of digital service transformation to provide a more comprehensive and systematic understanding in answering problem statements. It will also discuss identified components for the digital service transformation model. The contribution of this research is to enrich research related to digital transformation as well as to add insight regarding research on digital service transformation for further research.

This publication is structured as follows. Section 2 will discuss research related to digital service transformation, including digital transformation, service transformation, and digital service. Section 3 discusses methodology and data collection. Section 4 discusses the results and discussions related to digital service transformation. Section 5 provides conclusions from this research and shows the limitations and plans for future research.

2. RELATED WORKS

2.1. Digital Transformation

The presence of digital technology triggers digital disruption and forces digital transformation in organizations to adapt to these conditions, thus creating new organizational value (Vial, 2019). The results change organizational structure, processes, and business models. Digital transformation brings benefits such as increasing customer satisfaction, improving customer experience, increasing productivity, reducing costs, and gaining competitive advantages (Gebayew et al., 2018).

According to Verina and Titko (2019), three main components need to be aligned for the successful implementation of digital transformation, such as technology, human resources, and business/management processes. Digital transformation is initiated by driver components including digital technology, executive support, and increasing competition, as well as customer demands. The results include creating business value, increasing efficiency and reducing costs, providing competitive advantages, and other benefits. Fig. 1 shows an image of a digital transformation process model in an organization.

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Conceptual model for digital transformation (Verina & Titko, 2019).

The digital transformation process occurs primarily in three areas: customer experience, operational processes, and business models (Westerman et al., 2011). Each area contains nine building elements in total. According to Vial (2019), the impact of digital transformation on value creation and organizational structure can be positive or negative. These components were also identified as critical success factors for successful digital transformation implementation (Morakanyane et al., 2020).

Digital transformation affects business process, including products, offerings, and models (Bosch, 2018). Businesses are always aware of their customers’ needs. They have shifted from traditional methods (through surveys and interviews) to digital ones (personalization platforms and big data) due to the emergence of digital technology. The purchased item was converted into a service product, followed by physical offerings evolving into digital media. Manufacturing companies have moved from producing only products to producing products including services. Meanwhile, the service industry transforms physical services into digital services. This process of transforming products and services can be considered as digital service transformation.

2.2. Service Transformation

Service transformation is an idea changing traditional products and services by adopting manufacturing concepts to create new value, such as profits (Matzner et al., 2018). Service transformation has the same meaning as servitization, service infusion, or service transition (Dombrowski & Fochler, 2018). Servitization is a paradigm shift in which organizations initially only selling products switch into selling products with integrated services on these products (Klötzner, 2016). Service transformation is an attempt to generate new markets and reshape existing ones, which they call service innovation with a focus on creating value for the organization (Kandampully et al., 2021).

Service transformation has a close relationship with digital transformation. Since 2011 and 2013, service transformation and digital transformation have been the subject of continuous and pertinent research (Dombrowski & Fochler, 2018). It is essential to recognize that digital transformation technology is a key driver of service transformation. Service transformation driven by digital technology and all types of smart machines are just called digital transformation (Matzner et al., 2018). Despite coming from different fields, service transformation and digital transformation can converge as the concept of digital servitization, the transition to intelligent service-product software systems that generate value via monitoring, control, optimization, and independent management (Shen et al., 2021).

2.3. Digital Service

Generally, services are intangible products or solutions produced by suppliers by utilizing existing resources to meet customer demands (Alter, 2008). From the standpoint of value creation, services are experienced and cocreated by customers (Ben Letaifa et al., 2016). Digital service is service that utilizes digital technology as support. It is also known as advanced service technologies that rely on digital components embedded in physical products (Linde et al., 2023).

Digital services are objects of change in digital transformation. Organizations must use a combination of products, services, and software to derive value from digital services. These digital services must be personalized, dynamic, digital, and have high-quality solutions that emphasize perceptibility and connectivity, as a combination of physical products and services with digital value added (Shen et al., 2021). Digital services can be code-based software modules acquired and communicated via digital transactions, which are then sent to users via Internet protocols and supported by technological infrastructure (Ghazawneh, 2019).

3. METHODOLOGY

The discussion about digital service transformation literature review follows the systematic literature review guidelines in Kitchenham et al. (2009) and Henriette et al. (2015) as mentioned in Fig. 2.

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Systematic literature review method (Henriette et al., 2015; Kitchenham et al., 2009).

3.1. Research Questions

We formulate the following research questions:

1. What research related to digital service transformation has been done?

2. What are the definitions contained in the research related?

3. What are the components of digital service transformation?

4. How can we develop a digital service transformation model based on the specified components?

3.2. Research Strategy

The main keyword used in this research is “Digital Service Transformation,” using quotation marks (“ ”) to indicate that the search objective wants to get publications that mention the term digital service transformation both in the content, title, and metadata. To expand on the research, keywords are added to its building elements such as digital transformation, service transformation, and digital service. Keywords for searches include:

1. “Digital Service Transformation”;

2. “Digital Service” AND (“Digital Transformation” OR “Digitalization” OR “Digitalisation”);

3. “Digital Service” AND (“Service Transformation” OR “Servitization” OR “Servitisation”).

The search of articles was conducted regardless of time limit by using some sources including ACM, IEEE, and Scopus (Henriette et al., 2015). The article search was conducted on September 14, 2021.

3.3. Study Selection

This section defines included/excluded criteria for found publications. The criteria for filtering include: written in English, scientific publication, focus on discussing digital service transformation, digital transformation, or service transformation on digital service. The scientific publication criteria accept papers, journals, conferences, proceedings, theses, dissertations, and research reports, and exclude white papers, reports, wire feeds, web pages, and blogs. Other criteria for rejected articles are informal literature surveys, duplicated articles from the same studies, and articles discussing the procedures used for evidence-based software engineering or systematic literature review. Articles in the form of short papers, abstracts, and incomplete articles will also be rejected (Gebayew et al., 2018).

3.4. Quality Assessment

To evaluate the rigor and credibility of the chosen articles, it is necessary to define criteria for quality assessment. Evaluation requires a thorough examination of existing articles. The criteria for quality include an adequate description of the research context, a clear statement of research objectives, an explanation of the research question, a concise statement of the findings, and others (Henriette et al., 2015). One focus of quality assessment is the suitability of the research design to research objectives. The authors select articles based on criteria that emphasize transformation in the provision of digital services. Articles containing these elements but lacking correlation will be rejected.

4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

4.1. Research Related to Digital Service Transformation

Results from searching databases obtained 427 articles in total. After processing study selection and quality assessments, 52 qualified articles were obtained. Conducting descriptive analysis is one of the data presentation processes. Grouping includes publication year, bibliographic form, research method, and implementation area. Grouping is based on year in Table 1, bibliographic form in Table 2, research method in Table 3, and implementation area in Table 4.

Table 1. Articles based on year of publication

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Articles based on bibliographic forms

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Articles based on research method

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Articles based on implementation area

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0004.png 이미지

Based on Table 1, the term digital service transformation was still not widely known until 2016, despite having been coined in 2006. The number of publications has increased over the past few years and is becoming more commonly known as of 2021. According to Table 2, publications that use the digital service transformation term the most are journals, followed by conferences and book articles. Grouping by research method according to Palvia et al. (2006) in Table 3 shows that proposing conceptual frameworks or models is most frequently discussed. Other sources discuss how to assess the implementation of digital service transformation using surveys and interviews. Others examine digital service transformation using literature analysis. Others monitor implementation using case studies and other qualitative methods. Table 4 shows digital service transformation has been implemented in numerous service areas, with the private sector taking the lead. There are also those studies that cannot be classified in any sector. Specific discussions in the private sector include finance, industry, manufacturing, health, and transportation in which their products are services. Industries and manufacturers not only participate in providing products but also services supporting products.

Research on digital service transformation also includes value co-creation of the digital service transformation process (Manser Payne et al., 2021; Scupola & Mergel, 2021), the role of servitization, digitalization, and innovation performance in manufacturing companies (Shen et al., 2021), research on the service-product system as the combination of services and products as part of servitization (Barravecchia et al., 2021), digital platformization as a transformation strategy (Senyo et al., 2021), optical communication technologies for 5G (Liu & Deng, 2020), servitization in the context of IoT (West et al., 2018), framework for IoT (Chatfield & Reddick, 2019), designing an intelligent business model transformation tool (Augenstein, 2017), and others.

4.2. Defining Digital Service Transformation

The majority of collected articles do not explain the definition of the digital service transformation. Only an article with explicit definitions from Klötzner (2016) stated that digital service transformation is the process of transforming manufactured products into commercial services delivered through digital channels such as the Internet. This has the same meaning as servitization, as mentioned in Shen et al. (2021) and Sklyar et al. (2019b).

According to some researchers, digital service transformation is synonymous with digital transformation or service transformation. A study by Mihardjo et al. (2020a) implicitly describes digital service transformation as an organizational transformation based on digital service. Studies have also defined digital service innovation (Mihardjo et al., 2020b), digitally transformed public service (Germak et al., 2020), transformation on service ecosystem (Tana et al., 2019), transformation on enterprise services (Augenstein, 2017), or transformation in public services (Senyo et al., 2021). The same definition is also conveyed by Frennert (2023), Liu and Deng (2020), and Scupola and Mergel (2021). Others defined this term as service transformation enabled by digital technology and smart machines or digitally enabled service transformation (Omar et al., 2017; Weerakkody et al., 2016). Other studies consider it as a digitally implemented service process (Zysman, 2006), service transformation in the enterprise (Kandampully et al., 2021), service transformation in the industry (Ghazawneh, 2019; Zaki, 2019), or in government (Ramadani et al., 2017). Although these studies have considered similar terminology referring to service transformation, the definition does not mention the use of digital elements (Dombrowski & Fochler, 2018; Kandampully et al., 2021; Klötzner, 2016; Matzner et al., 2018); however, digital services require technology, platforms, and digital ecosystems which act as digital elements. Therefore, despite being classified as a service transformation, digital service transformation has the same meaning as digital transformation.

The variation of digital service transformation terminology based on each researcher’s understanding is displayed in Table 5. This table outlines the research focus, proposed concept of digital service transformation, and terminology-related components. Based on definition analysis from Table 5, the authors attempt to formulate digital service transformation definition as: a process of creating new/ improvement of digital service products as part of a business transformation and organizational strategy that aims to generate new added value through the use of digital technology. The authors limit the scope of this definition to digital services because digital transformation, in general, can encompass many aspects of an organization. This definition will impact component determination and the proposed model.

Table 5. Relevant studies about digital service transformation

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0005.png 이미지

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0006.png 이미지

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0007.png 이미지

4.3. Collecting Components of Digital Service Transformation

Based on its definition, the components of digital service transformation can be a combination of digital transformation and digital service components. According to Verina and Titko (2019), the conceptual model of digital transformation consists of three component categories: enablers, processes, and results. Similarly, Westerman et al. (2011) stated that digital transformation is enabled by digital capabilities, which initiate the process’ key components (customer experience, operational processes, and business models). Similar to what is stated by Vial (2019), digital transformation is enabled by the use of digital technologies. Table 6 describes digital transformation components.

Table 6. Digital transformation components

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0008.png 이미지

Digital service also has several component categories based on the collected articles. The components consist of: function (Matzner et al., 2018), form (Klötzner, 2016), development (Scupola & Mergel, 2021), value (Jordan, 2019; Sklyar et al., 2019b; Zaki, 2019), and objectives and developing processes (Ghazawneh, 2018). The components of digital services are outlined in Table 7.

Table 7. Digital service components

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_t0009.png 이미지

4.4. Proposing Conceptual Model of Digital Service Transformation

The digital service transformation model is proposed to explain the position of digital service transformation and what or how its role is in the overall digital transformation. This model is proposed in Fig. 3. There are three primary building blocks in the model: driver/enabler, process/event, and result/impact, adopting from Vial (2019) and Verina and Titko (2019). These three primary building blocks become a foundation for this proposed model, as we consider the transformation of digital service products to be part of digital transformation as a whole. Drivers are a collection of components as enablers and determine the direction of transformation. A process is a group of components that are being changed/processed. Results are a group of impact components expected from a transformation.

E1JSCH_2023_v11n1_31_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Digital service transformation conceptual model.

Digital service transformation is triggered or enabled by a block which is named a ‘driver.’ The digital capabilities component is highlighted because service objectives and functions (both being digital service components) are considered as transformation driver/enablers. Due to this service capability, a digital service can transform a process block. There, digital service component groups are categorized according to each digital transformation domain that participates in/experiences transformation (a business model, customer experience, use of digital technologies, and operational processes). The group of digital service components consists of a service process, service environment, service development, service capabilities, service delivery, and service experience. Here we can see which digital service components have changed following the digital transformation domain in which they are located. The transformation process then produces the result/impact explained in the result block. In this block, the impact can be value increasing of the digital services provided (in the service value component) or a change of digital services form (in the service form component). These two components are part of value creation domain, which is one of digital transformation’s components.

This model is built based on the stages presented in Baslyman et al. (2020), which include component extraction, model design, and model validation. In this study, we did not validate our proposed model. This model adopts from Vial (2019) and Verina and Titko (2019) as the basis of its design. The component extraction process has been done in the previous section. From component extraction, component metrics are compiled to show reference indicators and strengthen concepts from the proposed model. Next, we organize the digital service component collections into digital transformation blocks.

As previously mentioned, the three main building blocks of this proposed model are drivers, processes, and results. Each block contains several digital transformation domains, including five in the driver block, four in the process, and five in the results. There are digital capabilities in the driver block that include digital service components (service objectives and functions). Service objectives contain digital service goals, namely business, interaction, technology goals, and process. Business objectives are related to financial bottom line objectives, customer loyalty, brand formation, marketing, management, or strategies. Interaction is concerned with experienced users and process interaction design. Technology is related to technology and its components. Processes are related to improving routine services. Service functions relate to functions that can be provided by digital services, which include acts for the benefit of others as outcomes, and an exchange or value co-creation.

Furthermore, in the process block there are four domains where digital transformation occurs. The following is a description of digital service components:

1) The business model has five service components:

a. Service capabilities relate to platform capabilities. The determination of the platform is carried out as part of the transformation process. Various types of digital platforms have their advantages, features, and business goals. Here, the service provider must ensure the appropriate platform for transformation needs.

b. Service development. The digital service transformation process in this component includes planning, management, and assessment. Planning includes reorganizing the strategy and digital strategy work team, establishing community/governance groups, regulations, and teamwork. Management includes collaborating with externals or managing employee contracts. Transformation assessment is necessary through business forums, regulations, executive boards, and other comparable assessment forms.

c. Service environment relates to how a service can be integrated or adapted to other services. From a business perspective, this transformation process is essential to increase the user base and provide alternative options to existing business models.

d. Service processes relate to the management of semi-standard services in order to transform processes adhering to similar standards in order to create a new business opportunity.

e. Service delivery in digital service transformation includes determining changes in service costs to end-users.

2) Customer experience has six service components:

a. Service capabilities relate to device and hardware capabilities, in this case referring to device fragmentation across platforms where digital services are transformed. The greater the number of connected devices, the greater the customer-business interaction.

b. Service experience. The transformation is accomplished by enhancing the user experience when interacting with social media and Internet bots. The social media experience identifies the integration of digital services with various social media tools, technologies, and networks. The variety of integrated social media channels and the level of interaction between these channels will impact the use of digital services. Experience with Internet bots is crucial due to the importance of feedback management and follow-up.

c. The service environment in customer experience includes transformation of the digital service users’ experience. Mapping the user experience is the foundation for creating a digital strategy to analyze customer growth rates. The transformation process is executed on services with specific user experience groups based on the results of growth rate analysis and organizational leadership decisions.

d. Service process. The transformation in this case pertains to the standardized service process as the only service capable of user interaction.

e. Service delivery. Transformation here pertains to the review of delivery to determine the end user’s ability to interact with the organization or other users. Organizations must comprehend how the digital service transformation is implemented in order to create the simplest interaction features for end-users to review or be reviewed.

f. Service development includes design, assessment, and delivery. The design includes transformation in digital service review and user tests as part of digital service design. The assessment includes the transformation of service assessments through forums and survey websites. The delivery includes transformation in the creation and delivery of digital services to additional service users.

3) The use of digital technology has five service components:

a. Service capabilities involve technology transformation to design and develop digital services. Organizations must be able to evaluate the robustness, performance, adaptability, and efficacy of the technology employed in the development of digital services.

b. Service environment includes transformation of service personalization to meet user requirements. In this case, service providers must collaborate with the corresponding service industry and end-users in order to adapt the customization process according to their needs.

c. Service experience involves transformation in the experience of utilizing website or application services. The website service experience shows that organizations need to transform based on the technology used by users according to their experience in using websites. Likewise, the same is done for app service users on mobile devices.

d. Service processes for non-standard services. This service is not standardized yet, so organizations must leverage their digital technology to adapt to the needs and preferences of users.

e. Service delivery entails identifying the technology infrastructure that enables the transformation of digital services for end-users. Digital service providers must collaborate across different infrastructure levels, including platform, ecosystem, and digital marketplace levels to ensure the transformation goes according to plan.

4) The operational process has five service components:

a. Service development. The transformed components include design, delivery, and assessment. The design includes transformation in reviews, user tests, and prototype tests in digital service design. The assessment process includes the transformation of service assessment through improvement forums and website surveys for employees. Service delivery entails the transformation of the creation and delivery process to end-users into a routine business operation.

b. Service processes. The transformation relates to standardized services as routine operations of the organization.

c. Service delivery includes transformation for costefficiency of services to end-users. The provisioning costs and associated costs outlined in the digital strategy must be followed by routine operational processes.

d. The service environment includes service integration and user experience. Transformation occurs during the integration of services to enhance operational digitization. The user experience transformation process includes employee participation in customizing digital services.

e. Service capabilities are associated with the transformation of digital device capabilities, which result in more integrated services, strengthening employee interaction and communication.

Value creation is part of the service component included in the results block. Value creation includes service value and service form. Service value is a value expected to be achieved. These values can take the form of public values (economic, administrative, democratic, or community values) that government organizations are expected to achieve. Other values include organizational value, which is anticipated for the organization’s growth and development; customer value, which is anticipated from customer satisfaction and the fulfillment of expectations; and shareholder value, which is an anticipated profit for private organizations. Service form is an expected result from transformation itself, which includes integrated services with goods products, add-on services as complementary functions for products, and pure service, which is unbound and independent from products.

5. CONCLUSION

This paper discusses the terminology of digital service transformation based on the results of a systematic literature study. This study was able to identify previous research related to digital service transformation. This study also defines the concept and terminology of digital service transformation and its components based on the results of literature analysis. Furthermore, the results also include a proposed digital service transformation model that explains the position of this terminology and its role in overall digital transformation.

Digital service transformation is the process of creating or improving digital service products as part of a transformation of business and organization strategy that aims to create new added value through the use of digital technology. The digital service transformation components collected in this study are organized into reference metrics and might become a basis to develop the proposed model. Nonetheless, the model we propose has not yet been validated.

This study is expected to give a comprehensive picture of how digital services are transforming, which can serve as a reference for further related studies. This paper will become a foundation for further research, including validating the proposed model and creating a reference model and life cycle model of digital service transformation.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

참고문헌

  1. Aguiar, T., Bogea Gomes, S., da Cunha, P. R., & da Silva, M. M. (2019, October 28-31). Digital transformation capability maturity model framework. 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (pp. 51-57). IEEE. 
  2. Alter, S. (2008). Service system fundamentals: Work system, value chain, and life cycle. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.471.0071 
  3. Augenstein, D. (2017). Designing an intelligent business model transformation tool. In M. Eibl, & M. Gaedke (Eds.), Informatik 2017 (pp. 2357-2363). Gesellschaft fur Informatik. 
  4. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2020). The future ain't what it used to be: Forecasting the impact of ICT on the public sphere. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101410 
  5. Barravecchia, F., Franceschini, F., Mastrogiacomo, L., & Zaki, M. (2021). Research on product-service systems: Topic landscape and future trends. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 208-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2020-0164 
  6. Baslyman, M., AlGhamdi, A., & AlMuhaysh, S. (2020, August 31). Toward achieving the core goals of digital business transformation: A preliminary study. 2020 IEEE Tenth International Model-Driven Requirements Engineering (MoDRE) (pp. 68-72). IEEE. 
  7. Ben Letaifa, S., Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2016). The role of social platforms in transforming service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1933-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.083 
  8. Berghaus, S., & Back, A. (2016, September 4-6). Stages in digital business transformation: Results of an empirical maturity study. MCIS 2016 Proceedings (pp. 1-17). Association for Information Systems. 
  9. Bian, Z. (2020). Test automation process assessment. (Master's thesis). Metropolia University, Espoo, 
  10. Bosch, J. (2018). Towards a digital business operating system. In E. Cabello, J. Cardoso, L. Maciaszek, & M. van Sinderen (Eds.), ICSOFT 2017: Software technologies (pp. 296-308). Springer. 
  11. Bracken, M., & Greenway, A. (2018). How to achieve and sustain government digital transformation. IDB. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001215 
  12. Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2019). A framework for Internet of Things-enabled smart government: A case of IoT cybersecurity policies and use cases in U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.007 
  13. Dombrowski, U., & Fochler, S. (2018, July 31-August 2). Servitization as a key driver for digital transformation of manufacturing companies' spare parts service. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI) (pp. 291-296). IEEE. 
  14. Fichman, R. G., Dos Santos, B. L., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2014/38.2.01 
  15. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1-12. 
  16. Fleig, C., & Augenstein, D. (2017). Developing a business model transformation tool. https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000076445 
  17. Frach, L., Fehrmann, T., & Pfannes, P. (2017). Measuring digital government: How to assess and compare digitalisation in public sector organisations. In S. Falk, A. Rommele, & M. Silverman (Eds.), Digital government: Leveraging innovation to improve public sector performance and outcomes for citizens (pp. 25-38). Springer. 
  18. Frennert, S. (2023). Moral distress and ethical decision-making of eldercare professionals involved in digital service transformation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1839579 
  19. Gebayew, C., Hardini, I. R., Panjaitan, G. H. A., Kurniawan, N. B., & Suhardi. (2018, October 22-26). A systematic literature review on digital transformation. In Suhardi, A. Z. R. Langi, & A. A. Arman (Eds.), 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) (pp. 260-265). IEEE. 
  20. Germak, O. V., Gugueva, O. A., & Kalacheva, N. A. (2020). Automation of the materials' provision and the data from the cartographic and geodetic fund. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 913(4), 042028. 
  21. Ghazawneh, A. (2018, August 22-24). The dynamics of transformation in the development of digital services. In B. Andersson, B. Johansson, S. Carlsson, C. Barry, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), 27th International Conference on Information Systems Development (pp. 595-606). Lund University. 
  22. Ghazawneh, A. (2019). Digital services development and the dynamics of transformation by service providers. In B. Andersson, B. Johansson, C. Barry, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Advances in information systems development (pp. 97-112). Springer. 
  23. Gomes, S. B., Santoro, F. M., & Mira da Silva, M. (2020). An ontology for BPM in digital transformation and innovation. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design, 11(2), 52-77. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJISMD.2020040103 
  24. Granados, O. (2018). Rethinking branch banking network. In A. Morales, C. Gershenson, D. Braha, A. Minai, & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX (pp. 220-227). Springer. 
  25. Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., Scarbrough, H., & Panourgias, N. (2018). Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Information and Organization, 28(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001 
  26. Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015, October 2-5). The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. MCIS 2015 Proceedings (pp. 431-450). Association for Information Systems. 
  27. Ismail, M. H., Khater, M., & Zaki, M. (2017). Digital business transformation and strategy: What do we know so far? Cambridge Service Alliance. 
  28. Jordan, M. (2019). Creating public value through service design: Facilitation of human-centred service transformation in the city-state of Hamburg. (Master's thesis). Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, 
  29. Kandampully, J., Bilgihan, A., Bujisic, M., Kaplan, A., Jarvis, C. B., & Shukla, Y. (2021). Service transformation: How can it be achieved? Journal of Business Research, 136, 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.033 
  30. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 
  31. Klotzner, H. (2016). The digital service transformation in the manufacturing industry. (Master's thesis). UPF Barcelona School of Management, Barcelona, Spain. 
  32. Kutnjak, A. (2021). Covid-19 accelerates digital transformation in industries: Challenges, issues, barriers and problems in transformation. IEEE Access, 9, 79373-79388. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3084801 
  33. Linde, L., Frishammar, J., & Parida, V. (2023). Revenue models for digital servitization: A value capture framework for designing, developing, and scaling digital services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3053386 
  34. Liu, X., & Deng, N. (2020). Emerging optical communication technologies for 5G. In A. E. Willner (Ed.), Optical fiber telecommunications VII (pp. 751-783). Academic Press. 
  35. Manser Payne, E. H., Peltier, J., & Barger, V. A. (2021). Enhancing the value co-creation process: Artificial intelligence and mobile banking service platforms. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-10-2020-0214 
  36. Matzner, M., Buttgen, M., Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J., Alter, S., Fritzsche, A., Ng, I. C. L., Jonas, J. M., Martinez, V., Moslein, K. M., & Neely, A. (2018). Digital transformation in service management. Journal of Service Management Research, 2(2), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2018-2-3 
  37. McEachern, A., & Cholewa, D. (2017). Digital health services and digital identity in Alberta. In F. Lau, J. Bartle-Clar, G. Bliss, E. Borycki, K. Courtney, & A. Kuo (Eds.), Studies in health technology and informatics (pp. 222-227). IOS Press. 
  38. McParland, C., & Connolly, R. (2019, September 12-14). Employee monitoring in the digital era: Managing the impact of innovation. 2019 ENTRENOVA Conference Proceedings (pp. 548-557). Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy. 
  39. Mihardjo, L. W. W., Sasmoko, Alamsjah, F., & Elidjen. (2020a). Moderating effects of green IS on the relationship between organizational agility, customer experience and digital service innovation to achieve sustainable performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 426, 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012118 
  40. Mihardjo, L. W. W., Sasmoko, Alamsjah, F., & Elidjen. (2020b). Role of green information system in developing corporate reputation and co-creation-innovation to attain sustainable performance. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 426, 012120. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012120 
  41. Morakanyane, R., O'Reilly, P., & Mcavoy, J. (2020, January 7-10). Determining digital transformation success factors. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4356-4365). HICSS. 
  42. Newsom, A., & Jones, J. (2021). MyTN: Digitizing and transforming the citizen experience within Tennessee state government. https://www.nascio.org/awards-library/awards/digitizing-and-transforming-the-citizen-experience-within-tennessee-state-government 
  43. Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Sivarajah, U. (2017). Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: A case analysis of universal credit. International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.001 
  44. Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2018, September 28-30). Digital transformation: Drivers, success factors, and implications. MCIS 2018 Proceedings (pp. 1-15). MCIS. 
  45. Palvia, P., Midha, V., & Pinjani, P. (2006). Research models in information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01747 
  46. Park, Y. J., Sang, Y., Lee, H., & Jones-Jang, S. M. (2020). The ontology of digital asset after death: Policy complexities, suggestions and critique of digital platforms. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-04-2019-0030 
  47. Rackwitz, M., Hustedt, T., Hammerschmid, G. (2021). Digital transformation: From hierarchy to network-based collaboration? The case of the German "Online Access Act". DMS - Der Moderne Staat - Zeitschrift fur Public Policy, Recht und Management, 14(1-2021), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.05 
  48. Rajab, V. (2020). DesİQual: Destination in motion. (Master's thesis). University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
  49. Ramadani, L., Kurnia, S., & Breidbach, C. (2017, December 12-14). Advancing ICT4D research through service-dominant logic. ACIS 2017 Proceedings (pp. 1-9). ACIS. 
  50. Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2021). Value co-creation and digital service transformation: The case of Denmark. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896269 
  51. Senyo, P. K., Effah, J., & Osabutey, E. L. C. (2021). Digital platformisation as public sector transformation strategy: A case of Ghana's paperless port. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120387 
  52. Shen, L., Sun, C., & Ali, M. (2021). Role of servitization, digitalization, and innovation performance in manufacturing enterprises. Sustainability, 13(17):9878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179878 
  53. Sila, I. K., & Martini, I. A. O. (2020). Transformation and revitalization of service quality in the digital era of revolutionary disruption 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulang, 7(2), 197-205. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jmbi/article/view/30257/29245 
  54. Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Sorhammar, D., & Tronvoll, B. (2019a). Resource integration through digitalisation: A service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(11-12), 974-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1600572 
  55. Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., & Sorhammar, D. (2019b). Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Research, 104, 450-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.012 
  56. Swan, K. (2018). Leading with legitimacy in government design labs: Introducing design thinking to the Finnish immigration service. (Master's thesis). Aalto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland. 
  57. Tana, S., Breidbach, C., & Turpin, A. (2019, June 8-14). I want a Lamborghini: An ethnography of cryptocurrency communities. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 1-11). Association for Information Systems. 
  58. Truong, O. (2016). How fintech industry is changing the world. (Doctoral dissertation). Centria University of Applied Sciences, Kokkola, Finland. 
  59. Verina, N., & Titko, J. (2019, May 9-10). Digital transformation: Conceptual framework. In V. Skvarciany, & J. Stankeviciene (Eds.), International Scientific Conference: Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering' 2019 (pp. 719-727). Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. 
  60. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 
  61. Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Busaidy, M. (2016). Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: The lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006 
  62. West, S., Kujawski, D., & Bachler, L. (2018, November 22-23). Servitization of office lighting in the context of IoT. In E. Gomes, M. P. Cunha, & F. Vendrell-Herrero (Eds.), Book of abstracts: 7th International Conference on Business Servitization (pp. 162-169). OmniaScience. 
  63. Westerman, G., Calmejane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Digital transformation: A roadmap for billion-dollar organizations. https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Digital_Transformation__A_Road-Map_for_Billion-Dollar_Organizations.pdf 
  64. Yeager, K. (2015, June 7-10). DC microgrid performance excel-lence in electricity renewal. 2015 IEEE First International Conference on DC Microgrids (ICDCM) (pp. 377-380). IEEE. 
  65. Zaki, M. (2019). Digital transformation: Harnessing digital technologies for the next generation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0034 
  66. Zaoui, F., & Souissi, N. (2018). Onto-digital: An ontology-based model for digital transformation's knowledge. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 10(12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2018.12.01 
  67. Zaoui, F., & Souissi, N. (2021, June 5-12). A framework for a strategic digital transformation. In M. El Mohajir, M. Al Achhab, B. E. El Mohajir, B. K. Ane, & I. Jellouli (Eds.), 2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt) (pp. 502-508). IEEE. 
  68. Zysman, J. (2006). The algorithmic revolution? The fourth service transformation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 48. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139947