대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학 (Journal of radiological science and technology)

  • 제46권1호
  • /
  • Pages.9-14
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2288-3509(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1168(eISSN)
대한방사선과학회 (Korean Society of Radiological Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

뇌혈관 직경측정을 위한 3차원 회전 혈관조영술의 유용성

Usefulness of 3D Rotational Angiography for Cerebral Vascular Diameter Measurement

  • Seung-Gi, Kim (Department of Radiology, Myongji Medical Foundation Myongji Hospital) ;
  • Sang-Hyun, Kim (Department of Radiological Science, Shinhan University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.14
  • 심사 : 2023.01.06
  • 발행 : 2023.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

When measuring cerebrovascular with 3D rotational angiography, the accuracy was verified by comparing the actual size and measurement size, respectively. It is intended to help select therapeutic materials and instruments during cerebrovascular intervention by comparing the average error rates for measured values in the 3DRA and CTA methods by examining with protocols such as brain CTA, which are always performed in emergency situations. The mean error rate between the groups of measurers was ±3.655% for radiation technologist and ±3.331% for university students, and the mean error rate of the student group was within tolerance (±10%), and the independent sample T-test result t =0.879, p=0.394 (p>0.05) showed no statistically difference between the two. In addition, the average error rate measured by both groups by 3DRA was measured below ±5% within the tolerance error rate (±10%), and most of CTA was measured within the tolerance range (±10%), but showed an average error rate of up to 5.65%, and the independent sample T-test result was statistically more accurate than 3DRA. Both the 3DRA method and the brain CTA method for measuring cerebrovascular size could be accurately measured within tolerance, but it would be better to measure cerebrovascular blood vessels using a more accurate 3DRA method during cerebrovascular intervention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yoon PH, Kim YB. Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysm. The Korean Neurocritical Care Society. 2009;2 Supply2:74-9.
  2. Kim SG. Study on the Accuracy of Vessel Measurement According to Table Object Distance Change. Journal of Radiological Science Technology. 2019;42(6):435-40. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2019.42.6.435
  3. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, Nagano M, Maruoka K, Uemura S, et al. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenooculusive disease of the intracranial artery: Combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with distal subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:93-101.
  4. Chung TS, Joo JY, Lee SK, Laub G. Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with high resolution MR angiography using a section interpolation technique; Correlation with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Feb;20(2):229-35.
  5. Leung DA, Makinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammater T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Contrast-Enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology. 1996;200:569-71. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685359
  6. Yoon JT, Lee GB. Radiation Dose Reduction of Lens by Adjusting Table Height and Magnification Ratio in 3D Cerebral Angiography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2022;45(4):314-5.
  7. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, Nishi T, Uemura S, Yamura M, et al. Clinical Usefulness of Unsubtracted 3D Digital Angiography Compared with Rotational Digital Angiography in the Pretreatment Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Jun-Jul;24(6):1067-74.
  8. Hpchmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Pancreas Allografts: Comparison of Three-dimensional Rotational Angiography with Digital Subtraction Angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Aug; 23(7):1199-205.
  9. Product Manual: Xtravision Calibration and verification. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V; 2008.
  10. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kouji N, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Oct;23(9):1545-52.
  11. Kiyosue H, Tanoue S, Okahara M, Hori Y, Nakamura T, Nagatomi H, et al. Anatomic features predictive of complete aneurysm occlusion can be determined with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Aug;23(7):1206-13.
  12. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Aug;23(7):1199-205.
  13. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Trousset Y, Launay L, Kerrien E, Braun M, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: Clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):799-808. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr09799
  14. Kim BJ, Kim YH, Jeon JS, Chong JY, Kim JK, Park JG, Kang HK, et al. Usefulness of CT Angiography in Patients with Intracranial Occlusive Vascular Disease of the Circle of Willis: Comparison with Conventional Angiography. Journal of the Korean Radiological Society. 1996;35(3):301-6. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1996.35.3.301
  15. Khang HS, Seo SY, Han DK, Kwon SI, Shim SJ, Cho SJ. The Comparison of Usefulness between MDCT Angiography and DSA in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Aneurysm. Korean Journal of Medical Physics. 2011;22(4):184-9.