Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spanning Multiple Online Communities and Knowledge Contribution: The Cross-Level Moderating Effects of Environmental Scanning and Membership Fluidity

  • Yongsuk Kim (SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2023.08.29
  • Accepted : 2023.04.04
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many organizations facilitate a host of online knowledge sharing communities to assist internal knowledge sharing and operation. The permeable boundaries and voluntary structures of online communities allow individuals to span community boundaries and affect member resources and structures. Although much research has been done on members' knowledge contribution in online communities, relatively little is known about how a member's contribution to a community is shaped by the cross-level interactions of member's external boundary spanning and the community's environmental scanning or membership fluidity. Drawing from the theoretical lens of boundary spanning and the external view of online communities, we take a multi-level approach in the analysis of the activities of 1,992 members of 126 communities internal to a global company. We find that a member's external boundary spanning activity (e.g., external knowledge acquisition via reading posts) has a positive effect, though at a decreasing rate, on subsequent internal knowledge contribution (e.g., posting replies in the member's home community). This positive effect is stronger in communities that are more active in environmental scanning or have fluid membership and weaker in communities that are less active in environmental scanning or have stable membership.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., and Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490-1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
  2. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  3. Ancona, D., and Caldwell, D. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634-665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
  4. Ancona, D. G., and Caldwell, D. F. (2000). Compose teams to assure successful boundary activity. In E. A. Locke (ed.), The Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (pp. 199-210.). Blackwell: Oxford.
  5. Argote, L., and Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
  6. Arguello, J., Butler, B., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K., Rose, C., and Wang, X. (2006). Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 959-968). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124916
  7. Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., and Butler, B. S. (2011). The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 841-854. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0265
  8. Bechky, B. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
  9. Bruke, M., Kraut, R.., and Joyce, E. (2010). Membership claims and requests: Conversation-level newcomer socialization strategies in online groups. Small Group Research, 41(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409351936
  10. Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703
  11. Butler, B. S., and Wang, X. (2012). The cross-purposes of cross-posting: Boundary reshaping behavior in online discussion communities. Information Systems Research, 3(2), 993-1010. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0378
  12. Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc .13.4.442.2953
  13. Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
  14. Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., and Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(20), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
  15. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10. 1287/orsc.7.2.119 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.119
  16. Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  17. Cronin, M., and Weingart, L. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761-773. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275511
  18. Cross, R., and Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446-462. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040. 0075
  19. Cummings, J. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030. 0134
  20. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
  21. Faraj, S., and Johnson, S. L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities,. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0600
  22. Faraj, S., and Shimizu, T. (2018). Online communities and knowledge collaborations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
  23. Foote, J., (2022). A systems approach to studying online communities. Media and Communication, 10(2), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.5042
  24. Gibson, C. B., and Dibble, R. (2013). Excess may do harm: Investigating the effect of team external environment on external activities in teams. Organization Science, 24(3), 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0766
  25. Guo, A. F., Shi, K. X., Wang, W. Q., and Chen, J. F. (2022). Effects of user interactions and community self-government management on creative output in firm-hosted innovation communities: A cross-level empirical analysis. In IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(2), 468-482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2987974
  26. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  27. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
  28. Hall, H., and Graham, D. (2004). Creation and recreation: Motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities. International Journal of Information Management, 24(3) 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.02.004
  29. Herring, S. C. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
  30. Janis, I. L., and Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press.
  31. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., and Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0023
  32. Kim, Y., Jarvenpaa S. L., and Gu, B. (2018). External bridging and internal bonding: Unlocking the generative resources of member time and attention spent in online communities. MIS Quarterly, 42(1) 265-283. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13278
  33. Kudaravalli, S., and Faraj, S. (2008). The structure of collaboration in electronic networks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 706-726. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00172
  34. Lampel, J., and Bhalla, A. (2007). The role of status seeking in online communication: Giving the gift of experience. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 12(2), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00332.x
  35. Lang, J. C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384392
  36. Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., Weng, J., and Chen, Y. H., (2021). The impacts of relational capital on self-disclosure in virtual communities: A cross-level analysis of key moderators. Information Technology & People, 34(1), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2018-0541
  37. Levina, N., and Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335-363. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148682
  38. Liang, Y., Ow, T. T., and Wang, X. (2020). How do group performances affect users' contributions in online communities? A cross-level moderation model. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 30(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2020.1718457
  39. Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1(1), 57-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045671
  40. Majchrzak, A., Beath, C., Lim, R., and Chin, W. (2005). Managing client dialogues during information systems design to facilitate client learning. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 653-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148704
  41. Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0228
  42. McDermott, R., and Archibald, D. (2010). Harnessing your staff's informal networks. Harvard Business Review (March), 83-89.
  43. Menon, T., and Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49(4), 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.49.4.497.14422
  44. Moon, J., and Sproull, L. (2008). The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 494-515. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080. 0208
  45. Nonnecke, B., and J. Preece. (2000). Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent, CHI, ACM Press.
  46. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K
  47. Pawlowski, S., and Robey, D. (2004). Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 645-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148658
  48. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. (2006). Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18(16), 329-354. https://doi.org/10.17705/1C AIS.01816
  49. Reus, B., Moser, C., and Groenewegen, P. (2022). Expanding organisational knowledge online: The role of bridging members in knowledge expansion in online groups. Innovation, 24(1), 144-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1840381
  50. Teigland, R., and Wasko, M. M. (2003). Integrating knowledge through information trading: Examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance. Decision Sciences, 34, 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02341
  51. van Osch, W., and Bulgurcu, B. (2020). Idea generation in enterprise social media: Open versus closed groups and their network structures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), 904-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1831760
  52. Van Knippenberg, D., and Schippers, M. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 515-541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
  53. Wang, Y., and Fesenmaier, D. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1019678032000052934
  54. Zhang, M., and Zhu, F. (2011). Group size and incentive to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. American Economic Review, 101(4) 1601-1615. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1601