DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of cornea thickness and intra ocular pressure of 20 to 24 years old population in Korea

한국인 20세부터 24세까지 각막 두께와 안압의 분석

  • Douk Hoon Kim (Department of Optometry, Masan University) ;
  • Kishor Sapkota (University of Minho, Centre of physics, Braga, Portugal Nepal Eye Hospital)
  • 김덕훈 (마산대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • Received : 2023.09.15
  • Accepted : 2023.11.12
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of the cornea thickness and intra ocular pressure Korean adult of 20 to 24 year old using the Pentacam and tonometer. Methods: The subjects of this study were 43 Korean adults with healthy eyes. Corneal thickness was measured with Pentacam device. The intra ocular pressure was measured with tonometer. Data was analyzed by means of the Pearson's correlation cofficient. P-values<0.001 were considered statistically significant. Results: Mean age of subjects was 20.41±0.86 years. The mean +/- intra ocular pressure of the right eye and left eye were 16.236±2.523mmHg and 16.971±1.992mmHg, respectively. The mean central corneal thickness of the right eye and left eye was 545.324±38.682㎛ and 547.442±33.778㎛, respectively. No significant difference in central corneal thickness was found between the right and left eyes. But, there was a statistically significant difference between central cornea thickness and peripheral cornea thickness around 4 mm of central cornea(p<0.001, Pearson's correlation). However there was no statistically significant difference between central cornea thickness and intra ocular pressure. Conclusion: The results of this study could be used as a clinical reference data for diagnosis and treatment of cornea in Korean adult.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed C, Racem C, Yosra F, et al. Central corneal thickness in a healthy Tunisian population . TTunis Med. 2021;99(2): 221-224.
  2. Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Can I. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7:302-308.
  3. Grant WM, Burke JF, Jr. Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology. 1982;89:991-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(82)34675-8
  4. Diamsi DP, Burdon KP, Craig JE. The genetics of corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94(8): 971-976. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.162735
  5. Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, et al. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. . Arch Ophthalmol . 2004;122:1270-1275. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.9.1270
  6. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. . Surv Ophthalmol. . 2000;44:367-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
  7. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). . Ophthalmology. . 2001;108:1779-1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00760-6
  8. La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. . Arch Ophthalmol. . 2001;119(1):23-27.
  9. Wong AC, Wong CC, Yuen NS, Hui SP. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry.. Eye (Lond) . 2002;16(6):715-721. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700211
  10. Ashwin PT, Shah S, Pushpoth S, Wehbeh L, Ilango B. The relationship of Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) to Thinnest Central Cornea (TCC) in healthy adults. . Cont Lens Anterior Eye . 2009;32(2):64-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2008.07.006
  11. Oriowo OM. Profile of central corneal thickness in diabetics with and without dry eye in a Saudi population . Optometry . 2009;80(8):442-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2008.12.008
  12. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology . 1998;105(6):969-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3
  13. Alsbirk PH. Corneal thickness. I. Age variation, sex difference and oculometric correlations. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). . 1978;56(1):95-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1978.tb00471.x
  14. Gros-Otero J, Arruabarrena-Sanchez C, Teus M. Central corneal thickness in a healthy Spanish population. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. . 2011;86(3):73-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2173-5794(11)70013-5
  15. Lazreg S, Mesplie N, Praud D, Delcourt C, Kamoun H, Chahbi M, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness and biomechanical properties between North African and French patients. . J Cataract Refract Surg. . 2013;39(3):425-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.015