DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How to Enhance Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Fit of Wearables: An Exploratory Study about the Physical Attributes of Smart Wristbands and Smartwatches

  • Shim, Soo In (Department of Fashion Design, Jeonbuk National University/Research Institute of Human Ecology, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Heejeong (Department of Human Ecology, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.06
  • 심사 : 2023.11.05
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31

초록

Wearable devices, attached to the human body, track and enhance users' activities, health, and communication. Therefore, considering ergonomic factors in product design is crucial. However, previous research has somewhat overlooked the importance of integrating ergonomic design elements into a broad spectrum of design factors. This study aims to examine the impact of physical attributes inherent in smart wristbands and smartwatches on the perceived functional value, specifically, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and fit. A survey was conducted among 289 US adults who had experience using smart wristbands or smartwatches. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, t-test, MANOVA, and regression analysis in SPSS version 29. The results showed that the shape of the front display significantly influenced perceived ease of use, and the product's weight had a substantial impact on both perceived ease of use and fit. Furthermore, distinct technical features on the front display had varied effects on perceived usefulness, ease of use, and fit. Notably, the presence of activity tracking, alarm, and calendar functionalities led to distinct differences in ease of use and fit. Features such as distance tracking, phone call, social media notifications, text messaging, and time display functions showed significant influences on the perception of fit. These findings provide insights into the physical values of smart wristbands and smartwatches as perceived by users.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. Billinghurst and T. Starner, "Wearable devices: new ways to manage information," Computer, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57-64, Jan. 1999. DOI: 10.1109/2.738305
  2. S. Seneviratne, Y. Hu, T. Nguyen, G. Lan, S. Khalifa, K. Thilakarthna, M. Hassan and A. Seneviratne. "A survey of wearable devices and challenges," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials(IEEE), Vol. 19, NO. 4, pp. 2573-2620, July 2017. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2731979
  3. Counterpoint, Submission of manuscript. https://www.counterpointresearch.com
  4. IDC, Submission of manuscript. https://www.idc.com
  5. CNET, Submission of manuscript. https://www.cnet.com
  6. S. Jin, "A Study on the Effect of Individual Characteristics on Acceptance Intention of Wearable Healthcare Devices: Focusing on the UTAUT2 and Innovativeness." Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information(KSCI), Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 129-143. March 2020. DOI: 10.9708/jksci.2020.25.03.129
  7. G. Shin, M. H. Jarrahi, Y. Fei, A. Karami, N. Gafinowitz, A. Byun and X. Lu, "Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review," Journal of Biomedical Informatics(JBI), Vol. 93, pp. 103-153, May 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103153
  8. J. Jeong, Y. Kim and T. Roh, "Do consumers care about aesthetics and compatibility? The intention to use wearable devices in health care," SAGE Open, Vol. 11, No. 3, August 2021. DOI: 10.1177/21582440211040070
  9. K. L. Hsiao and C. C. Chen, "What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value," Journal of Telematics and Informatics(TI), Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 103-113, April 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.002
  10. J. H. Chung, "The Effect of Design Innovation Attributes on Product and Brand Attitudes and Purchase Intention -Focusing on Smart Watches-." Journal of The Korean Society Design Culture(JKSDC), Vo. 25, No. 3, pp. 403-414, September 2019. DOI: 10.18208/ksdc.2019.25.3.403
  11. J. Choi and P. Kim, "A Study on the Impact of Service Improvement on the Satisfaction Level of Smart Watch Functions," Korean Journal of Business Administration(KJBA), Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 807-825, May 2021. DOI: 10.18208/ksdc.2019.25.3.403
  12. B. Ramkumar and Y. Liang, "How do smartwatch price and brand awareness drive consumer perceptions and purchase intention? A perceived value approach," International Journal of Technology Marketing(IJTM), Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 154-180, September 2020. DOI: 10.1504/IJTMKT.2020.110126
  13. Planner 5d, Submission of manuscript. https://planner5d.com/
  14. B. Sklar, Digital Communications, Prentice Hall, pp. 187, 1998.
  15. K. H. Na, "A Study on the Mediating Effect of Brand Authenticity Between Design Innovation of Smart Watches and Loyalty Intention," A Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea(BDAK), Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 127-140, May 2023. DOI: 10.18852/bdak.2023.21.2.127
  16. J. Y. Jeong, K. K. Chang, "A Smart Strap Design Proposal on the Utilisation of SCAMPER -focused on MR TIME," Journal of Basic Design & Art(JBDA), Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 481-494, January 2022. DOI: 10.47294/KSBDA.22.2.22
  17. J. H. Hong, "A Study on the Understanding of Smart Watch on Intention of Continuous Use in Health Care," Journal of Global Convergence Research(JGCR), Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 93-102, December 2022. DOI: 10.57199/jgcr.2022.1.2.93
  18. Etnews, Submission of manuscript. https://www.etnews.com
  19. S. Fleury and N. Chaniaud, "Multi-user centered design: acceptance, user experience, user research and user testing," Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science(TIES), pp. 1-16, December 2023. DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2023.2166623
  20. K. H. Na, "A Study on the Mediating Effect of Brand Authenticity Between Design Innovation of Smart Watches and Loyalty Intention," Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea(JBDAK), Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 127-140, June 2023. DOI: 10.18852/bdak.2023.21.2.127
  21. H. Yang, J. Yu, H. Zo and M. Choi, "User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value," Telematics and Informatics(TI), Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 256-269, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
  22. S. H. W. Chuah, P. A. Rauschnabel, N. Krey, B. Nguyen, T. Ramayah and S. Lade, "Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption," Computers in Human Behavior(CHB), Vol. 65, pp. 276-284, December 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047
  23. J. H. Thun, C. B. Lehr and M. Bierwirth, "Feel free to feel comfortable-an empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics(IJPE), Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 551-561, October 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.12.017
  24. G. B. Pratama, A. Widyanti, N. Nurfitrisari and S. A. Salma, "Ergonomic Product Design: An Empirical Study on The Influencing Factors to Use and to Buy," Strategic Design Research Journal(SDRJ), Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 248-262, December 2022. DOI: 10.4013/sdrj.2022.153.03
  25. L. Bonapace, The ergonomics of pleasure. WS Green, & PW, Jordan. Human factors in product design, current practice and future trends, Taylor & Francis, pp. 234-248, 1999.
  26. M. A. Rupp, J. R., Michaelis, D. S. McConnell and J. A. Smither, "The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact," Applied Ergonomics(AE), Vol. 70, pp. 77-87, July 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.005
  27. R. Mugge and J. P. Schoormans, "Newer is better! The influence of a novel appearance on the perceived performance quality of products," Journal of Engineering Design(JED), Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 469-484, September 2012. DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2011.618802
  28. R. Mugge, D. W. Dahl and J. P. Schoormans, ""What you see, is what you get?" Guidelines for influencing consumers' perceptions of consumer durables through product appearance," Journal of Product Innovation Management(JPIM), Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 309-329, June 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12403