DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental Planning for Publicness Improvement of Urban Public Space - Focusing on an Intergenerational Perceptions Survey -

도시 공공공간의 공공성 향상에 영향을 미치는 환경계획요인에 관한 연구 - 세대 간 인식조사를 바탕으로 -

  • Lee, Gyeongyeon (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ha, Mikyoung (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University) ;
  • Byun, Gidong (Dept. of Interior Architecture & Built Environment, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.05.27
  • Accepted : 2022.10.06
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive specific realization plans and priorities for strengthening the publicness of urban public spaces that closely affect the quality of life for its urban residents. In this study, the perception of young people and the elderly were analyzed to derive environmental planning factors that affect the improvement on publicness of urban public spaces. These eight factors were explored: environmental planning considering emotional satisfaction, inclusive space planning, pedestrian-centered environmental planning, sustainable operations planning, easy-to-access facility planning, sanitary management planning, shared facilities planning, community support and integrated design planning. To improve the quality of life for individuals, the overall publicness of society needs to be strengthened. The youth and the elderly perceived publicness as important in all public spaces, and the elderly tended to perceive it as more significant. In particular, there was a tendency to perceive publicness as meaningful as medical and transportation facilities. There was a difference between generations in public administrative facilities and culture and arts facilities. It was found that the younger generation sought to expand publicness through efficiency and convenience, and the elderly through a sense of belonging and integration of the community. To improve the publicness of a neighborhood unit facility, a detailed operation plan considering the behavior and specific situations of major demand groups is required. In addition, the regional base facility should ensure access to facilities and programs as a top priority regardless of age. In future studies, based on the planning factors derived from this study, it will be possible to present practical plans and management plans for improving the publicness of a space created by surveying specific public spaces.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 한국연구재단 4단계 BK21 사업과 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 신진연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NFR-2020S1A5A8042212).

References

  1. Bea, J. (2015). A study on contemporary art museum's "Publicness" in the city - a case study of National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Thesis, The Graduate School of Environmental Studies Seoul National University.
  2. Choi, J., Cheon, H., & Lee, M. (2015). A comparative study of the civility across generations in korean society. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 38(4), 113-137.
  3. Choi, J., & Park, D. (2020). A study on accessibility and importance of living facilities in residential areas. Residential Environment : Journal of The Resudential Environment Institute of Korea, 18(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2020.18.1.1
  4. Choi, K. (2005). A Study on the Design Factors of the Community Facilities Concentrated for the Public, Thesis, Seoul National University.
  5. Cho, S., & Hwang, E. (2014). A comparative study on conditions of a livable city. Ewha Journal of Social Sciences, 30(2), 235-267. https://doi.org/10.16935/EJSS.2014.30.2.009
  6. Choi, Y., & Choi, S. (2013). Generational boundaries from the perspective of political attitudes - preliminary study for the possibility of political generations. Social Sciences Research Institute, 29(2), 159-201.
  7. Gho, G. (2000). A new cross in social movement: the politics of public sphere and publicity. Culture/Science, 23(), 32-60.
  8. Jang, K., Kang, M., & Kim, K. (2006). A study on the improvement of public open space on the major urban development project. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(12), 249-258.
  9. Jeong, S. (1994). Approach to the partnership in urban space design based on an analysis of the public characteristics in the exterior space of architecture : focusing on 'the public open space' of the high-rise office buildings in Seoul. Dissertation. Seoul National University.
  10. Jung, S., Kwon, J., Jung, H., & Kim, S. (2021). A qualitative study on the role of the state in happiness of the people. Korean Journal of Qualitative Research in Social Welfare, 15(2), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.22867/KAQSW.2021.15.2.87
  11. Kertzer, D.I. (1983). Generation as a sociological problem. Review of Sociology, 9, 125-149.
  12. Khang, H. (2016). A consideration on the meaning of public sphere in contemporary city. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(1), 161-170.
  13. Kim, Y., Kang, I., & Lee, C. (2004). A study on attitudes toward older adults - comparative analysis of young, midlife, and older adults. Journal of Families and Better Life, 22(1), 65-75.
  14. Kim, Y. (2006). A Study on the Improvement of the Pedestrian Space in Urban Street - focused on an euljiro 1-ga crossroads. Thesis. Seoul National University.
  15. Ko, Y., & Choi, G. (2020). Survey on the Elderly's Perception and Satisfaction of Urban Environment. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  16. Lee, G., Oh, J., Ha, M., & Byun, G. (2021). A study on the research trend of architectural publicness in public space. Proceeding of Conference of the Architectural Institude of Korea, 42(1), 27-30.
  17. Lee, G., Oh, J., Ha, M., & Byun, G. (2022). A basic study on the recognition of publicness in urban public spaces - focusing on the intergenerational recognitions survey. Proceeding of Conference of the Architectural Institude of Korea, 42(1), 10-13.
  18. Lee, H., & Ha, M. (2010). A study on the architectural publicity of underground and indoor open spaces in mixed-use buildings - focused on the survey of the users' importance. Journal of The Architecture Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 26(12), 25-34.
  19. Lee, S., Tchah, C., & Lim, Y. (2007). A Study on the Concept and Current Issue of Urban Public Space. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  20. Lee, S., Tchah, C., Lim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2008). A Study on Improvement of Systems for Comprehensive Urban Public Space Planning. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  21. Lee, S., & Um, W. (2011). A Handbook for Urban Public Spaces in Daily Life. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  22. Maeng, D., Lee, J., & Baik, C. (2018). Major Issues and Tasks of Urban Planning Facilities according to the Change of Conditions in Seoul. The Seoul Institute.
  23. Namkung, E. (2021). Understanding the perception of generational conflicts and public policies: age and class differences. Health and welfare policy forum, 293(-), 54-69.
  24. Oh, J., Lee, G., Ha, M., & Byun, G. (2022). Basic research to establish publicness evaluation index of urban public space. Proceeding of Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 42(1), 1-4.
  25. Oh, S., Yu, K., Seong, E., Kang, H., & Ham, S. (2020). A Study on Enacyment of Framework Act on Space Welfare. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  26. Park, J. (2001). Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of generations. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 24(2), 47-78.
  27. Paik, W. (2007). Public Adminstration and Publicness in Korea. Korean Society and Public Administraction, 18(2), 1-22.
  28. Son, K., & Jin, J. (2020). An analysis of the effect of regional characteristics on the residential satisfaction of the elderly and the young - using path analysis of the structural equation model. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 55(4), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.08.55.4.19
  29. Yu, K., Kim, J., Kim, Y., & Lee, M. (2007). A Foundational Survey to Manage Policy Directions Concerning Architecture & Urban Spaces. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  30. Youm, C., Cho, J., & Sim, K. (2008). A Fundamental Study on the Contemporary Publicness of Architecture & Urban Space. Architecture & Urban Research Institute.