DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical modelling of a shear-thickening fluid damper using optimal transit parameters

  • Yu, Chung-Han (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories) ;
  • Surjanto, Yohanes K. (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chen, Pei-Ching (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Peng, Shen-Kai (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories) ;
  • Chang, Kuo-Chun (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University)
  • Received : 2021.11.09
  • Accepted : 2022.08.25
  • Published : 2022.11.25

Abstract

The viscosity of a shear-thickening fluid damper (STFD) can increase dramatically when the STFD undergoes high-rate of excitation. Therefore, accurate numerical modelling of the STFD has been considered difficult due to this distinct feature. This study aims to develop a numerical model to accurately simulate the response of the STFD. First, a STFD is designed, fabricated, and installed in the laboratory. Then, performance tests are conducted in which sine waves with nine frequencies at three amplitude levels are adopted as the displacement excitations to the STFD. A novel numerical model which contains two parameter sets of the discrete Bouc-Wen model as well as two parameters for transiting the two parameter sets. Therefore, a total number of eighteen parameters need to be identified in the damper model. The symbiotic organisms search is applied to optimize the parameters. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that the proposed STFD model with transit parameter sets outperforms the conventional discrete Bouc-Wen model. The proposed STFD model can be applied to analyses of structures in which STFDs are installed in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express our sincere gratitude to the experimental facilities and expense supported by NCREE (06110A2500) as well as the financial support provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China (Taiwan) (MOST 108-2221-E-011-006-MY2).

References

  1. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bull. Seismol. Soc. America, 97(5), 1486-1501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120060255
  2. Banuelos-Garcia, F.H., Ayala, G. and Lopez, S. (2020), "A displacement-based seismic design procedure for buildings with fluid viscous dampers", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 18(5), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.5.609
  3. Barnes, H.A. (1989), "Shear-thickening ("Dilatancy") in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids", J. Rheol., 33(2), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550017
  4. Bidgoli, M.R., Kolahchi, R. and Karimi, M.S. (2016), "An experimental study and new correlations of viscosity of ethylene glycol-water based nanofluid at various temperatures and different solid concentrations", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 58(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.1.093
  5. Chen, P.C., Ting, G.C. and Li, C.H. (2020), "A versatile smallscale structural laboratory for novel experimental earthquake engineering", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 18(3), 337-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.337
  6. Cheng, M.Y. and Prayogo, D. (2014), "Symbiotic organisms search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm", Comput. Struct., 139, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007
  7. Constantinou, M.C. and Symans, M.D. (1993), "Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 2(2), 93-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.4320020203
  8. Crivellaro, C. and Donha, D.C. (2008), "Discrete-time dynamic model of a magneto-rheological damper for semi-active control design", ABCM Symposium Series in Mechatronics, Vol. 3, pp. 27-36.
  9. Ghaffarzadeh, H. (2013), "Semi-active structural fuzzy control with MR dampers subjected to near-fault ground motions having forward directivity and fling step", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 12(6), 595-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.6.595
  10. Guler, E. and Alhan, C. (2019), "Effectiveness of non-linear fluid viscous dampers in seismically isolated buildings", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 17(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.2.191
  11. Hoffman, R.L. (1974), "Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. II. theory and experimental tests", J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 46(3), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(74)90059-9
  12. Huang, X. (2018), "Evaluation of genetic algorithms for the optimum distribution of viscous dampers in steel frames under strong earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 14(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.3.215
  13. Khater, H.M. (2016), "Nano-Silica effect on the physicomechanical properties of geopolymer composites", Adv. Nano Res., Int. J., 4(3), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2016.4.3.181
  14. Kurino, H., Tagami, J., Shimizu, K. and Kobori, T. (2003), "Switching oil damper with built-in controller for structural control", J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), 895-904. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(895)
  15. Lewandowski, R., Slowik, M. and Przychodzki, M. (2017), "Parameters identification of fractional models of viscoelastic dampers and fluids", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 63(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.2.181
  16. Linderman, L.E. and Spencer Jr., B.F. (2015), "Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 16(6), 1147-1167. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1147
  17. Oncu-Davas, S. and Alhan, C. (2019), "Probabilistic behavior of semi-active isolated buildings under pulse-like earthquakes", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 23(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.3.227
  18. Providakis, C.P. (2008), "Effect of LRB isolators and supplemental viscous dampers on seismic isolated buildings under near-fault excitations", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1187-1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.020
  19. Spencer Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1997), "Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper", J. Eng. Mech., 123(3), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)
  20. Wei, M., Lin, K., Guo, Q. and Sun, H. (2019), "Characterization and performance analysis of a shear thickening fluid damper", Measure. Control, 52(1-2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294018819543
  21. Yeh, F.Y., Chang, K.C., Chen, T.W. and Yu, C.H. (2014), "The dynamic performance of a shear thickening fluid viscous damper", J. Chinese Inst. Engineers, 37(8), 983-994. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2014.912775
  22. Zapateiro, M., Luo, N., Taylor, E. and Dyke, S.J. (2010), "Modeling and identification of a class of MR fluid foam dampers", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 6(2), 101-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.2.101
  23. Zhao, Q., He, Y., Yao, H. and Wen, B. (2018), "Dynamic performance and mechanical model analysis of a shear thickening fluid damper", Smart Mater. Struct., 27(7), 075021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aac23f