International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Human Rights and Civil Freedoms: Anthropological Approach in the Theory of Law in the Age of Information Technology

  • Received : 2022.11.05
  • Published : 2022.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The article aims at studying the institution of human rights and civil freedoms with due regard to the anthropological approach in the theory of law. To the greatest extent, the provisions of non-classical legal science are confirmed in the Anglo-Saxon legal family, which endows the judge with law-making functions. In this regard, the role of a person in the legal sphere is increasing. The main research method was deduction used to study the anthropological approach to the institution of human rights and freedoms. The article also utilizes the inductive method, the method of systematic scientific analysis, comparative legal and historical methods. To solve the task set, the authors considered the legal foundations and features of human rights and freedoms in the modern world. The article proves that the classical legal discourse, represented by various types of interpretation, reduces the rule of law to the analysis of its logical structure and does not answer the questions posed. It is concluded that the prerequisite for the anthropological approach in the theory of law is the use of human-like concepts in modern legislation (guilt, justice, peculiar ferocity, child abuse, willful evasion, conscientiousness).

Keywords

References

  1. Gavrilova, Yu. A.: Tolkovanie prava po obemu [The interpretation of law and its scope]. An extended abstract of thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences, Saratov State Academy of Law, Saratov, 30 pp. (2008).
  2. Pavlov, V. I.: Antropologicheskaya kontseptsiya prava [The anthropological concept of law]. In: Chestnov, I. L. (ed.) Postklassicheskaya ontologiya prava, pp. 325-377. Aleteiya, Saint Petersburg (2016).
  3. Ponomarev, K. N.: Ob effektivnosti pravoprimenitelnoi deyatelnosti [On effective law enforcement activities]. Vektor nauki TGU 2, 123-126 (2009).
  4. Pavlov, V. I.: Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava [The issues related the theory of state and law]: Student's textbook. Akad. MVD, 262 pp. (2017).
  5. Lebedev, V. I.: Obshchaya teoriya prava: Lektsii [The general theory of law: Lectures]. Parovaya skoropechatnya G. Pozharova, Saint Petersburg, 79 pp. (1903).
  6. Balkin, J. M.: The promise of legal semiotics. Texas Law Revue 69, 1831-1852 (1991).
  7. Alpatov, Yu. M., Grudtsyna, L. Yu. Molchanov, S. V.: Globalizatsiya i upravlenie natsionalnymi obrazovatelnymi sistemami [The globalization and management of national educational systems]. Obrazovanie i pravo 7, 202-208 (2017).
  8. Kevelson, R.: The law as a system of signs. Plenum press, Cop., New York, London (1988).
  9. Chestnov, I. L.: Antropologicheskaya programma pravoprimeneniya [The anthropological program of law enforcement]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN 4, 87-101 (2016).
  10. Saidov, A. I.: Metodologicheskie problemy antropologii prava [The methodological issues of anthropology of law]. In: Antropologiya prava: Stati uchastnikov IX Mezhdunarodnogo. kruglogo stola. Lviv. 6-7 grud. 2013, pp. 247-259. Halyts'ka Vydavnycha Spilka, Lviv (2014).
  11. Bachinin, V. A.: Filosofiya prava: Konspekt lektsii [The philosophy of law: The abstract of lectures]. Konsum, Kharkiv, 367 pp. (2002).
  12. Pilyugina, N. S.: Antropologicheskii metod poznaniya prava: Teoretiko-pravovoi analiz [The anthropological method of cognizing law: Theoretical and legal analysis]. An extended abstract of thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, 25 pp. (2009).
  13. Lavskii, V. G.: Kritika sovremennoi burzhuaznoi filosofskoi antropologii (biologo-naturalisticheskaya raznovidnost) [The criticism of modern bourgeoisie philosophical anthropology (biological and naturalistic types)]. An extended abstract of thesis for a Candidate Degree in Philosophical Sciences, Kyiv State University named after T.G. Shevchenko, Kyiv, 170 pp. (1984).
  14. Pavlov, V. I., Dubrava, N. M.: Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v kontekste teorii interpretatsii i antropologicheskoi kontseptsii prava [Judicial legislation within the theory of interpretation and anthropological concept of law]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika 8, 553-560 (2014).
  15. Wagner, A., Broekman, J. M.: Promises and prospects of legal semiotics - An introduction. In: Wagner, A., Broekman, J. M. (eds.) Prospects of legal semiotics, pp. 5-17. Springer, Dordrecht (2011).
  16. Grudtsyna, L. J.: Role of civil society, mechanisms of future development and regulation. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(3), 294-297 (2014).