The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems (한국ITS학회 논문지)

The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems (한국ITS학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestion of Evaluation Elements Based on ODD for Automated Vehicles Safety Verification : Case of K-City

자율주행자동차 안전성 검증을 위한 ODD 기반 평가요소 제시 : K-City를 중심으로

  • Kim, Inyoung (Dept. of Transportation Eng., Univ. of Ajou) ;
  • Ko, Hangeom (Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute, Korea Transportation Safety Authority) ;
  • Yun, Jae-Woong (Dept. of Mobility, TUV SUD Korea Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Yoseph (Dept. of Transportation Eng., Univ. of Ajou) ;
  • Yun, Ilsoo (Dept. of Transportation Eng., Univ. of Ajou)
  • 김인영 (아주대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 고한검 (한국교통안전공단 자동차안전연구원 자율주행실) ;
  • 윤재웅 (티유브이슈드코리아 모빌리티 부서) ;
  • 이요셉 (아주대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 윤일수 (아주대학교 교통시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2022.07.11
  • Accepted : 2022.09.13
  • Published : 2022.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As automated vehicle(AV) accidents continue to occur, the importance of safety verification to ensure the safety and reliability of automated driving system(ADS) is being emphasized. In order to encure safety and reliability, it is necessary to define an operational design domain(ODD) of the ADS and verify the safety of the ADS while evaluating its ability to respond in situations outside of the ODD. To this, international associations such as SAE, BSI, NHTSA, ISO, etc. stipulate ODD standards. However, in Korea, there is no standard for the ODD, so automated vehicles's ODD expression method and safety verification and evaluation are not properly conducted. Therefore, this study analyzed overseas ODD standards and selected suitable ODD for safety verification and evaluation, and presented evaluation elements for ADS safety verification and evaluation. In particular, evaluation elements were selected by analyzing the evaluation environment of the automated driving experimental city (K-City) that supports the development of ADS technology.

자율주행자동차(Automated vehicle, AV) 교통사고가 지속적으로 발생하면서 자율주행시스템(automated driving system, ADS)의 안전성 및 신뢰성을 확보하기 위한 안전성 검증의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 안전성 및 신뢰성을 확보하기 위해서는 ADS의 운행가능영역(operational design domain, ODD)을 정의하고 ODD를 벗어나는 상황에서의 대응 능력을 평가하면서 ADS의 안전성을 검증해야 할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해 SAE, BSI, NHTSA, ISO 등의 국제 기구에서는 ODD 분류 기준 및 표준을 규정하고 있으나 국내의 경우 ODD 기준이 부재하여 AV의 ODD 표현 방법 및 안전성 검증 및 평가가 적절히 이루어지지 않고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 해외 ODD 분류 기준을 분석하고 안전성 검증 및 평가에 적합한 분류 기준을 선정하였다. 선정된 ODD를 기반으로 ADS 안전성 검증 및 평가에 필요한 평가요소를 제시하였다. 특히, ADS 기술 개발을 지원하는 자율주행 실험도시(K-City)의 평가환경을 분석하여 평가요소를 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부 및 국토교통과학기술진흥원의 연구비 지원 (22AMDP-C162184-02)에 의해 수행하였습니다. 본 논문은 2022년 한국ITS학회 춘계학술대회에서 발표된 논문을 수정 및 발전시켜 작성하였음을 밝힙니다.

References

  1. Ai Times, http://www.aitimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=138745, 2022.07.04.
  2. Association for Standardization of Automation and Measuring System(ASAM), https://www.asam.net/project-detail/asam-openodd/, 2022.05.10.
  3. Automated Vehicle Safety Consortium(2020), AVSC Best Practice for Describing an Operational Design Domain: Conceptual Framework and Lexicon, pp.1-26.
  4. Autoweek, https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a39943287/mercedes-drive-pilot-level-3-autonomous/, 2022.07.03.
  5. British Standards Institution(BSI)(2020), PAS 1883:2020 Operational Design Domain (ODD) taxonomy for an automated driving system (ADS)-Specification, pp.1-26.
  6. Cui, J. and Sabaliauskaite, G.(2017), "On the Alignment of Safety and Security for Autonomous Vehicles", Proceedings of IARIA CYBER, pp.59-64.
  7. Hankyung, https://www.hankyung.com/car/article/2022010201021, 2022.07.04.
  8. International Organization for Standardization(ISO)(2021), Road vehicles-Scenario-based safety evaluation framework for Automated Driving Systems, pp.1-94.
  9. International Organization for Standardization(ISO)(2022), Road vehicles-Test scenarios for automated driving systems-Taxonomy for operational design domain, pp.4-33.
  10. Kim, H., Lim, K., Kim, J. and Son, W.(2020), "Operational Design Domain for Testing of Autonomous Shuttle on Arterial Road", The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp.135-148. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2020.19.2.135
  11. Kim, J. and Kee, S.(2020), "A Research on the ODD and OEDR Guidelines Based on the Demonstration Case of Autonomous Driving in Sejong City", Transactions of The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers(KSAE), vol. 28, no. 10, pp.659-668. https://doi.org/10.7467/KSAE.2020.28.10.659
  12. Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute(KATRI), http://vr2.dreamvrad.net/k-city360vr/,2022.06.02.
  13. Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute(KATRI), https://www.katri.or.kr/web/contents/katri2030101.do, 2022.06.05.
  14. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, https://www.law.go.kr/, 2022.08.12.
  15. Korea Transport Institute(2020), Main contents of Automated driving technology development innovation project and future plan, pp.1-10.
  16. Korean National Police Agency(2011), Traffic safety sign installation and management manual, pp.1-256.
  17. Korean National Police Agency(2020), Traffic signal setting and management manual, pp.1-238.
  18. Lee, G. and Woo, H.(2021), "A Study on Safety Guideline of Level 4 Automated Driving Vehicles", Korean Auto-vehicle Safety Association, vol. 13, no. 3, pp.86-94.
  19. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2022), Guidelines for the installation and management of road safety facilities, pp.1-97.
  20. Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning(2021), Level 4 The future of automated vehicles, pp.45-56.
  21. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(NHTSA)(2018), A Framework for Automated Driving System Testable Cases and Scenarios, pp.1-180.
  22. Nikkei Asia, https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Automobiles/Honda-launches-world-s-first-level-3-s elf-driving-car, 2022.07.02.
  23. Park, S., So, J., Ko, H., Jeong, H. and Yun, I.(2019), "Development of Safety Evaluation Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicle Tests Using 5-Layer Format (Case of the Community Road)", The Journal of the Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp.114-128. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2019.18.2.114
  24. PEGASUS(2020), PEGASUS Method an Overview, pp.4-33.
  25. Sabaliauskaite, G., Cui, J. and Liew, L. S.(2018), "Integrating Autonomous Vehicle Safety and Security Analysis Using STPA Method and the Six-Step Model", International Journal on Advances in Security, vol. 11, no. 1, pp.160-169.
  26. Safety Assurance KUdos for Reliable Autonomous Vehicles(SAKURA), https://www.sakura-prj.go.jp/project_info/, 2022.06.25.
  27. Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE) International(2021), Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, pp.1-41.
  28. The New York Times(2022), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/08/technology/tesla-autopilot-safety-data.html, 2022.06.30.
  29. TUV SUD Korea(2021), Selection of Operational Design Domain, pp.1-9.
  30. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe(UNECE)(2021), New Assessment/Test Method for Automated Driving (NATM) Master Document(Final Draft), pp.1-5.
  31. Zanchin, B. C., Adamshuk, R., Santos, M. M. and Collazos, K. S.(2017), "On the instrumentation and classification of autonomous cars", 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics(SMC), pp.2631-2636.